1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2098
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1383 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2018 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2025 …}
+body: """
> on the proton encryption, i did know about this but does that apply to proton-to-proton, proton-to-NonProton, or both? if you have details on this let me know.\n
\n
As I know it applies to both. Formerly they were asking (among other things) about the titles of your latest emails for account recovery. (after I have put all the links here I realized that these don’t give a details on whether this also applies to inter-proton messages…)\n
\n
A few sources:\n
\n
[proton.me/…/proton-mail-encryption-explained](https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)\n
\n
> Subject lines and recipient/sender email addresses are encrypted but not end-to-end encrypted.\n
\n
[www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/…/eiphhs7/?c…](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)\n
\n
[…stackexchange.com/…/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en…](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)\n
\n
> either way the fact that they dont makes me feel that proton is a similar honeypot to signal and telegram, where they make a compromise with the five eyes, to give them metadata even if actual contents are safe. metadata can be much more powerful than contents often times\n
\n
Yeah, might as well be. But if it is, I’m afraid we won’t get to know for a few decades, if ever. And I think it’s still better than the alternatives… the alternative email providers, that is. \n
If it comforts you, in their reddit comment I linked they mention (in 2019…) that there’s a proposal they support for openpgp to be able to have an encrypted subject line.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700100027 {#2459
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@privacybro@lemmy.ninja"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2028 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
-id: 128730
-bodyTs: "'/eiphhs7':111 '/proton-mail-encryption-explained':89 '/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':120 '/r/protonmail/comments/':110 '/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':115 '/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':92 '/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en':117 '2019':223 'abl':235 'account':56 'actual':156 'address':98 'afraid':181 'also':78 'altern':203,205 'among':45 'appli':13,38,79 'ask':44 'better':200 'c':112 'comfort':212 'comment':217 'compromis':145 'content':157,167 'decad':191 'detail':28,74 'dont':127 'either':121 'email':54,97,206 'encrypt':4,100,107,239 'end':104,106 'end-to-end':103 'even':154 'ever':193 'eye':149 'fact':124 'feel':130 'five':148 'former':41 'get':185 'give':72,151 'honeypot':136 'inter':82 'inter-proton':81 'know':7,33,36,187 'latest':53 'let':31 'line':94,241 'link':64,219 'm':180 'make':128,143 'mention':221 'messag':84 'metadata':153,160 'might':171 'much':163 'nonproton':22 'often':168 'openpgp':232 'power':165 'propos':228 'proton':3,16,18,20,83,132 'proton-to-nonproton':19 'proton-to-proton':15 'proton.me':88,91 'proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':90 'provid':207 'put':61 'realiz':67 'recipient/sender':96 'recoveri':57 'reddit':216 'safe':159 'security.stackexchange.com':119 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':118 'signal':138 'similar':135 'sourc':87 'stackexchange.com':116 'still':199 'subject':93,240 'support':230 'telegram':140 'thing':47 'think':196 'time':169 'titl':50 'way':122 'well':173 'whether':76 'won':183 'www.reddit.com':109,114 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/':108 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':113 'yeah':170"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1654271"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700100027 {#2391
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2098
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1383 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2018 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2025 …}
+body: """
> on the proton encryption, i did know about this but does that apply to proton-to-proton, proton-to-NonProton, or both? if you have details on this let me know.\n
\n
As I know it applies to both. Formerly they were asking (among other things) about the titles of your latest emails for account recovery. (after I have put all the links here I realized that these don’t give a details on whether this also applies to inter-proton messages…)\n
\n
A few sources:\n
\n
[proton.me/…/proton-mail-encryption-explained](https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)\n
\n
> Subject lines and recipient/sender email addresses are encrypted but not end-to-end encrypted.\n
\n
[www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/…/eiphhs7/?c…](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)\n
\n
[…stackexchange.com/…/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en…](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)\n
\n
> either way the fact that they dont makes me feel that proton is a similar honeypot to signal and telegram, where they make a compromise with the five eyes, to give them metadata even if actual contents are safe. metadata can be much more powerful than contents often times\n
\n
Yeah, might as well be. But if it is, I’m afraid we won’t get to know for a few decades, if ever. And I think it’s still better than the alternatives… the alternative email providers, that is. \n
If it comforts you, in their reddit comment I linked they mention (in 2019…) that there’s a proposal they support for openpgp to be able to have an encrypted subject line.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700100027 {#2459
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@privacybro@lemmy.ninja"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2028 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
-id: 128730
-bodyTs: "'/eiphhs7':111 '/proton-mail-encryption-explained':89 '/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':120 '/r/protonmail/comments/':110 '/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':115 '/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':92 '/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en':117 '2019':223 'abl':235 'account':56 'actual':156 'address':98 'afraid':181 'also':78 'altern':203,205 'among':45 'appli':13,38,79 'ask':44 'better':200 'c':112 'comfort':212 'comment':217 'compromis':145 'content':157,167 'decad':191 'detail':28,74 'dont':127 'either':121 'email':54,97,206 'encrypt':4,100,107,239 'end':104,106 'end-to-end':103 'even':154 'ever':193 'eye':149 'fact':124 'feel':130 'five':148 'former':41 'get':185 'give':72,151 'honeypot':136 'inter':82 'inter-proton':81 'know':7,33,36,187 'latest':53 'let':31 'line':94,241 'link':64,219 'm':180 'make':128,143 'mention':221 'messag':84 'metadata':153,160 'might':171 'much':163 'nonproton':22 'often':168 'openpgp':232 'power':165 'propos':228 'proton':3,16,18,20,83,132 'proton-to-nonproton':19 'proton-to-proton':15 'proton.me':88,91 'proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':90 'provid':207 'put':61 'realiz':67 'recipient/sender':96 'recoveri':57 'reddit':216 'safe':159 'security.stackexchange.com':119 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':118 'signal':138 'similar':135 'sourc':87 'stackexchange.com':116 'still':199 'subject':93,240 'support':230 'telegram':140 'thing':47 'think':196 'time':169 'titl':50 'way':122 'well':173 'whether':76 'won':183 'www.reddit.com':109,114 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/':108 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':113 'yeah':170"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1654271"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700100027 {#2391
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2098
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1383 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2018 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2025 …}
+body: """
> on the proton encryption, i did know about this but does that apply to proton-to-proton, proton-to-NonProton, or both? if you have details on this let me know.\n
\n
As I know it applies to both. Formerly they were asking (among other things) about the titles of your latest emails for account recovery. (after I have put all the links here I realized that these don’t give a details on whether this also applies to inter-proton messages…)\n
\n
A few sources:\n
\n
[proton.me/…/proton-mail-encryption-explained](https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)\n
\n
> Subject lines and recipient/sender email addresses are encrypted but not end-to-end encrypted.\n
\n
[www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/…/eiphhs7/?c…](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)\n
\n
[…stackexchange.com/…/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en…](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)\n
\n
> either way the fact that they dont makes me feel that proton is a similar honeypot to signal and telegram, where they make a compromise with the five eyes, to give them metadata even if actual contents are safe. metadata can be much more powerful than contents often times\n
\n
Yeah, might as well be. But if it is, I’m afraid we won’t get to know for a few decades, if ever. And I think it’s still better than the alternatives… the alternative email providers, that is. \n
If it comforts you, in their reddit comment I linked they mention (in 2019…) that there’s a proposal they support for openpgp to be able to have an encrypted subject line.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700100027 {#2459
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@privacybro@lemmy.ninja"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2028 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
-id: 128730
-bodyTs: "'/eiphhs7':111 '/proton-mail-encryption-explained':89 '/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':120 '/r/protonmail/comments/':110 '/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':115 '/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':92 '/why-is-some-meta-data-not-en':117 '2019':223 'abl':235 'account':56 'actual':156 'address':98 'afraid':181 'also':78 'altern':203,205 'among':45 'appli':13,38,79 'ask':44 'better':200 'c':112 'comfort':212 'comment':217 'compromis':145 'content':157,167 'decad':191 'detail':28,74 'dont':127 'either':121 'email':54,97,206 'encrypt':4,100,107,239 'end':104,106 'end-to-end':103 'even':154 'ever':193 'eye':149 'fact':124 'feel':130 'five':148 'former':41 'get':185 'give':72,151 'honeypot':136 'inter':82 'inter-proton':81 'know':7,33,36,187 'latest':53 'let':31 'line':94,241 'link':64,219 'm':180 'make':128,143 'mention':221 'messag':84 'metadata':153,160 'might':171 'much':163 'nonproton':22 'often':168 'openpgp':232 'power':165 'propos':228 'proton':3,16,18,20,83,132 'proton-to-nonproton':19 'proton-to-proton':15 'proton.me':88,91 'proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained)':90 'provid':207 'put':61 'realiz':67 'recipient/sender':96 'recoveri':57 'reddit':216 'safe':159 'security.stackexchange.com':119 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/196265/why-is-some-meta-data-not-encrypted-in-proton-mail)':118 'signal':138 'similar':135 'sourc':87 'stackexchange.com':116 'still':199 'subject':93,240 'support':230 'telegram':140 'thing':47 'think':196 'time':169 'titl':50 'way':122 'well':173 'whether':76 'won':183 'www.reddit.com':109,114 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/':108 'www.reddit.com/r/protonmail/comments/b1ect2/a_question_about_encryption_metadata_subject/eiphhs7/?context=3)':113 'yeah':170"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1654271"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700100027 {#2391
date: 2023-11-16 03:00:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2361
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2385 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2386 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2359 …}
+body: """
> Yeah, except you aren’t supposed to TOFU.\n
\n
A better solution would be to have both at the same time. \n
Browser says: x number of CAs say that this site is authentic (click here for a list). Do you trust this site? Certificate fingerprint: … Certificate randomart: …\n
\n
And then there would be options to trust it once, trust it temporarily, trust it and save the cert. The first 2 could also block JS if wanted.\n
\n
I can see this would annoy the mainstream users, so probably this should be opt-in, asked at browser installation or something like that.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699662032 {#2080
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@floofloof@lemmy.ca"
"@PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml"
"@jasondj@ttrpg.network"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2066 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
-id: 210047
-bodyTs: "'2':68 'also':70 'annoy':80 'aren':4 'ask':92 'authent':32 'better':10 'block':71 'browser':21,94 'cas':26 'cert':65 'certif':43,45 'click':33 'could':69 'except':2 'fingerprint':44 'first':67 'instal':95 'js':72 'like':98 'list':37 'mainstream':82 'number':24 'opt':90 'opt-in':89 'option':52 'probabl':85 'randomart':46 'save':63 'say':22,27 'see':77 'site':30,42 'solut':11 'someth':97 'suppos':6 'temporarili':59 'time':20 'tofu':8 'trust':40,54,57,60 'user':83 'want':74 'would':12,50,79 'x':23 'yeah':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1612556"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699662032 {#2469
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2361
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2385 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2386 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2359 …}
+body: """
> Yeah, except you aren’t supposed to TOFU.\n
\n
A better solution would be to have both at the same time. \n
Browser says: x number of CAs say that this site is authentic (click here for a list). Do you trust this site? Certificate fingerprint: … Certificate randomart: …\n
\n
And then there would be options to trust it once, trust it temporarily, trust it and save the cert. The first 2 could also block JS if wanted.\n
\n
I can see this would annoy the mainstream users, so probably this should be opt-in, asked at browser installation or something like that.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699662032 {#2080
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@floofloof@lemmy.ca"
"@PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml"
"@jasondj@ttrpg.network"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2066 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
-id: 210047
-bodyTs: "'2':68 'also':70 'annoy':80 'aren':4 'ask':92 'authent':32 'better':10 'block':71 'browser':21,94 'cas':26 'cert':65 'certif':43,45 'click':33 'could':69 'except':2 'fingerprint':44 'first':67 'instal':95 'js':72 'like':98 'list':37 'mainstream':82 'number':24 'opt':90 'opt-in':89 'option':52 'probabl':85 'randomart':46 'save':63 'say':22,27 'see':77 'site':30,42 'solut':11 'someth':97 'suppos':6 'temporarili':59 'time':20 'tofu':8 'trust':40,54,57,60 'user':83 'want':74 'would':12,50,79 'x':23 'yeah':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1612556"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699662032 {#2469
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2361
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2385 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2386 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2359 …}
+body: """
> Yeah, except you aren’t supposed to TOFU.\n
\n
A better solution would be to have both at the same time. \n
Browser says: x number of CAs say that this site is authentic (click here for a list). Do you trust this site? Certificate fingerprint: … Certificate randomart: …\n
\n
And then there would be options to trust it once, trust it temporarily, trust it and save the cert. The first 2 could also block JS if wanted.\n
\n
I can see this would annoy the mainstream users, so probably this should be opt-in, asked at browser installation or something like that.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699662032 {#2080
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@floofloof@lemmy.ca"
"@PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml"
"@jasondj@ttrpg.network"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2066 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
-id: 210047
-bodyTs: "'2':68 'also':70 'annoy':80 'aren':4 'ask':92 'authent':32 'better':10 'block':71 'browser':21,94 'cas':26 'cert':65 'certif':43,45 'click':33 'could':69 'except':2 'fingerprint':44 'first':67 'instal':95 'js':72 'like':98 'list':37 'mainstream':82 'number':24 'opt':90 'opt-in':89 'option':52 'probabl':85 'randomart':46 'save':63 'say':22,27 'see':77 'site':30,42 'solut':11 'someth':97 'suppos':6 'temporarili':59 'time':20 'tofu':8 'trust':40,54,57,60 'user':83 'want':74 'would':12,50,79 'x':23 'yeah':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1612556"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699662032 {#2469
date: 2023-11-11 01:20:32.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2141
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+body: """
By the way, playing it in the browser it sounded as if it was pretty strongly compressed for consumption, so to speak, but yt-dlp got a better quality version.\n
\n
Maybe there’s a quality selector of the website, and it has just been mistaken by uBlock as a tracker among the high profile trackers present on the page?
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699564520 {#2364
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@FartsUnited@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2069 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2143 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2338 …}
-id: 105465
-bodyTs: "'among':52 'better':29 'browser':8 'compress':17 'consumpt':19 'dlp':26 'got':27 'high':54 'mayb':32 'mistaken':46 'page':60 'play':4 'present':57 'pretti':15 'profil':55 'qualiti':30,36 'selector':37 'sound':10 'speak':22 'strong':16 'tracker':51,56 'ublock':48 'version':31 'way':3 'websit':40 'yt':25 'yt-dlp':24"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1600795"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699564520 {#2394
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2141
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+body: """
By the way, playing it in the browser it sounded as if it was pretty strongly compressed for consumption, so to speak, but yt-dlp got a better quality version.\n
\n
Maybe there’s a quality selector of the website, and it has just been mistaken by uBlock as a tracker among the high profile trackers present on the page?
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699564520 {#2364
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@FartsUnited@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2069 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2143 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2338 …}
-id: 105465
-bodyTs: "'among':52 'better':29 'browser':8 'compress':17 'consumpt':19 'dlp':26 'got':27 'high':54 'mayb':32 'mistaken':46 'page':60 'play':4 'present':57 'pretti':15 'profil':55 'qualiti':30,36 'selector':37 'sound':10 'speak':22 'strong':16 'tracker':51,56 'ublock':48 'version':31 'way':3 'websit':40 'yt':25 'yt-dlp':24"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1600795"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699564520 {#2394
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2141
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2067 …}
+body: """
By the way, playing it in the browser it sounded as if it was pretty strongly compressed for consumption, so to speak, but yt-dlp got a better quality version.\n
\n
Maybe there’s a quality selector of the website, and it has just been mistaken by uBlock as a tracker among the high profile trackers present on the page?
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699564520 {#2364
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@FartsUnited@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2069 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2143 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2338 …}
-id: 105465
-bodyTs: "'among':52 'better':29 'browser':8 'compress':17 'consumpt':19 'dlp':26 'got':27 'high':54 'mayb':32 'mistaken':46 'page':60 'play':4 'present':57 'pretti':15 'profil':55 'qualiti':30,36 'selector':37 'sound':10 'speak':22 'strong':16 'tracker':51,56 'ublock':48 'version':31 'way':3 'websit':40 'yt':25 'yt-dlp':24"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1600795"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699564520 {#2394
date: 2023-11-09 22:15:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2336
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2342 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2333 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2340 …}
+body: """
> fastmail\n
\n
That’s a paid service, right? I don’t know much about them, they may have other pros too, but proton also allows you to use your own email client if you’re in a plan.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699546951 {#2191
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2327 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2344 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 104565
-bodyTs: "'allow':24 'also':23 'client':31 'email':30 'fastmail':1 'know':11 'may':16 'much':12 'paid':5 'plan':37 'pros':19 'proton':22 're':34 'right':7 'servic':6 'use':27"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1599338"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699546951 {#2324
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2336
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2342 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2333 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2340 …}
+body: """
> fastmail\n
\n
That’s a paid service, right? I don’t know much about them, they may have other pros too, but proton also allows you to use your own email client if you’re in a plan.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699546951 {#2191
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2327 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2344 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 104565
-bodyTs: "'allow':24 'also':23 'client':31 'email':30 'fastmail':1 'know':11 'may':16 'much':12 'paid':5 'plan':37 'pros':19 'proton':22 're':34 'right':7 'servic':6 'use':27"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1599338"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699546951 {#2324
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2336
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2342 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1883 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2333 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2340 …}
+body: """
> fastmail\n
\n
That’s a paid service, right? I don’t know much about them, they may have other pros too, but proton also allows you to use your own email client if you’re in a plan.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1699546951 {#2191
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee"
"@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2327 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2344 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 104565
-bodyTs: "'allow':24 'also':23 'client':31 'email':30 'fastmail':1 'know':11 'may':16 'much':12 'paid':5 'plan':37 'pros':19 'proton':22 're':34 'right':7 'servic':6 'use':27"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1599338"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699546951 {#2324
date: 2023-11-09 17:22:31.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
17 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
18 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2042 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+body: "It is, for them."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698956794 {#2343
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@zShxck@lemmy.ml"
"@bizdelnick@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2040 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2129 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
-id: 85505
-bodyTs: ""
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1545727"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698956794 {#2335
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
19 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2042 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+body: "It is, for them."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698956794 {#2343
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@zShxck@lemmy.ml"
"@bizdelnick@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2040 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2129 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
-id: 85505
-bodyTs: ""
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1545727"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698956794 {#2335
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
20 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2042 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2332 …}
+body: "It is, for them."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698956794 {#2343
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@zShxck@lemmy.ml"
"@bizdelnick@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2040 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2129 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
-id: 85505
-bodyTs: ""
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1545727"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698956794 {#2335
date: 2023-11-02 21:26:34.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
21 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
22 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2093 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+body: "Can’t BTRFS be used on a LUKS volume? Or does it have disadvantages?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698863799 {#2060
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@clot27@lemm.ee"
"@lemann@lemmy.one"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2059 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2047 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2057 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2055 …}
-id: 89262
-bodyTs: "'btrfs':3 'disadvantag':14 'luk':8 'use':5 'volum':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1538554"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698863799 {#2314
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
23 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2093 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+body: "Can’t BTRFS be used on a LUKS volume? Or does it have disadvantages?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698863799 {#2060
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@clot27@lemm.ee"
"@lemann@lemmy.one"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2059 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2047 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2057 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2055 …}
-id: 89262
-bodyTs: "'btrfs':3 'disadvantag':14 'luk':8 'use':5 'volum':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1538554"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698863799 {#2314
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
24 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2093 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2348 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2090 …}
+body: "Can’t BTRFS be used on a LUKS volume? Or does it have disadvantages?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698863799 {#2060
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@clot27@lemm.ee"
"@lemann@lemmy.one"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2059 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2047 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2057 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2055 …}
-id: 89262
-bodyTs: "'btrfs':3 'disadvantag':14 'luk':8 'use':5 'volum':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1538554"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698863799 {#2314
date: 2023-11-01 19:36:39.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
25 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
26 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2053
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2125 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+body: """
The hard part of the problem is not spoofing the pixel, but preserving your privacy.\n
\n
Your solution solves the easier problem, but it doesn’t preserve your privacy.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1697924468 {#2094
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Gargari@lemmy.ml"
"@randombullet@feddit.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2041 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2100 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2105 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2111 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2102 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2103 …}
-id: 63661
-bodyTs: "'doesn':24 'easier':20 'hard':2 'part':3 'pixel':11 'preserv':13,26 'privaci':15,28 'problem':6,21 'solut':17 'solv':18 'spoof':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1449295"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697924468 {#2241
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
27 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2053
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2125 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+body: """
The hard part of the problem is not spoofing the pixel, but preserving your privacy.\n
\n
Your solution solves the easier problem, but it doesn’t preserve your privacy.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1697924468 {#2094
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Gargari@lemmy.ml"
"@randombullet@feddit.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2041 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2100 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2105 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2111 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2102 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2103 …}
-id: 63661
-bodyTs: "'doesn':24 'easier':20 'hard':2 'part':3 'pixel':11 'preserv':13,26 'privaci':15,28 'problem':6,21 'solut':17 'solv':18 'spoof':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1449295"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697924468 {#2241
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
28 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2053
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2125 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2095 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2165 …}
+body: """
The hard part of the problem is not spoofing the pixel, but preserving your privacy.\n
\n
Your solution solves the easier problem, but it doesn’t preserve your privacy.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1697924468 {#2094
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Gargari@lemmy.ml"
"@randombullet@feddit.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2041 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2100 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2105 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2111 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2102 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2103 …}
-id: 63661
-bodyTs: "'doesn':24 'easier':20 'hard':2 'part':3 'pixel':11 'preserv':13,26 'privaci':15,28 'problem':6,21 'solut':17 'solv':18 'spoof':9"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1449295"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697924468 {#2241
date: 2023-10-21 23:41:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|