GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/u/@hottari@lemmy.ml/top/2023-12-05::2023-12-05

Response
200 OK
IP
3.145.106.102
Profiled on
Token
04fd28

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 0.15 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.03 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
  +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
  +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
    \n
    I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
    \n
    Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 79
  +favouriteCount: 84
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
    date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
      +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
      +body: """
        Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
        \n
        Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
        \n
        > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
        \n
        Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
        "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
        "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
        "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      -id: 198255
      -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 198255
    }
  ]
  -id: 19722
  -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
  -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701691094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
    date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
  +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
  +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
    \n
    I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
    \n
    Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 79
  +favouriteCount: 84
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
    date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
      +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
      +body: """
        Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
        \n
        Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
        \n
        > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
        \n
        Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
        "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
        "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
        "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      -id: 198255
      -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 198255
    }
  ]
  -id: 19722
  -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
  -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701691094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
    date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
  +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
  +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
    \n
    I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
    \n
    Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 79
  +favouriteCount: 84
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
    date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
      +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
      +body: """
        Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
        \n
        Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
        \n
        > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
        \n
        Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
        "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
        "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
        "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      -id: 198255
      -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
        date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 198255
    }
  ]
  -id: 19722
  -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
  -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701691094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
    date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
  +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
    +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
    +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
      \n
      I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
      \n
      Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 79
    +favouriteCount: 84
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
      date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709}
    ]
    -id: 19722
    -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
    -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1701691094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
      date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
  +body: """
    Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
    \n
    Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
    \n
    > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
    \n
    Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
    "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
    "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
    "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  -id: 198255
  -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 198255
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
  +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
    +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
    +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
      \n
      I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
      \n
      Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 79
    +favouriteCount: 84
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
      date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709}
    ]
    -id: 19722
    -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
    -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1701691094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
      date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
  +body: """
    Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
    \n
    Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
    \n
    > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
    \n
    Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
    "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
    "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
    "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  -id: 198255
  -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 198255
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709
  +user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1582
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2459 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1718 …}
    +slug: "Arch-or-NixOS"
    +title: "Arch or NixOS?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I’ve been here a week ago already asking if Arch would be fine for a laptop used for university, as stability is a notable factor in that and I’m already using EndeavourOS at home, but now I’m curious about something else too - what about Arch vs NixOS?\n
      \n
      I heard that NixOS is pretty solid, as due to the one file for your entire system format you can both copy and restore your system easily whenever, apart from your normal files and application configurations of course.\n
      \n
      Are there **any major downsides to NixOS compared to Arch** apart from the Arch Wiki being a bit less relevant? I’d also lose access to the AUR, but admittedly I don’t think I’ve ever actually needed it for anything, it’s just nice to have. Also, since NixOS has both rolling release and static release and you can mix and match if you wanna get packages from unstable or not, I’m not losing Arch’s bleeding edge, which is nice.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 79
    +favouriteCount: 84
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1724395554 {#1566
      date: 2024-08-23 08:45:54.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1709}
    ]
    -id: 19722
    -titleTs: "'arch':1 'nixo':3"
    -bodyTs: "'access':113 'actual':126 'admit':118 'ago':7 'alreadi':8,32 'also':111,137 'anyth':130 'apart':79,99 'applic':85 'arch':11,48,98,102,166 'ask':9 'aur':116 'bit':106 'bleed':168 'compar':96 'configur':86 'copi':72 'cours':88 'curious':41 'd':110 'downsid':93 'due':59 'easili':77 'edg':169 'els':44 'endeavouro':34 'entir':66 'ever':125 'factor':26 'file':63,83 'fine':14 'format':68 'get':156 'heard':52 'home':36 'laptop':17 'less':107 'lose':112,165 'm':31,40,163 'major':92 'match':152 'mix':150 'need':127 'nice':134,172 'nixo':50,54,95,139 'normal':82 'notabl':25 'one':62 'packag':157 'pretti':56 'releas':143,146 'relev':108 'restor':74 'roll':142 'sinc':138 'solid':57 'someth':43 'stabil':22 'static':145 'system':67,76 'think':122 'univers':20 'unstabl':159 'use':18,33 've':2,124 'vs':49 'wanna':155 'week':6 'whenev':78 'wiki':103 'would':12"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1701691094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/6098933"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701604694 {#1696
      date: 2023-12-03 12:58:14.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1574 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1650 …}
  +body: """
    Arch is not stable but it’s easy to fix issues arising from its rolling release nature. One of the ways being utilizing the AUR package`downgrade`for easy package version rollbacks. I should also note that the most common reason for Arch breaking is rarely ever because of the distro itself but because upstream has introduced breaking changes. You can see this when an upstream feature breaks in Arch, then Fedora picks up the same bug a few weeks/month later.\n
    \n
    Arch is however the most solid distro I’ve ever used since I began using Linux many many moons ago.\n
    \n
    > One thing that is an Arch problem is that, if you do not update often enough, you can end-up with outdated keys that prevent you from installing before packages. The solution is just to update the keyring before updating everything else but this is confusing for a new user and kind of dumb in my opinion. I feel like the system should do this for me.\n
    \n
    Arch already does [this](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing#Upgrade_system_regularly). Could be that your install has the keyring refresh service disabled but I’ve had it enabled for a good while now and I’ve never encountered that outdated pacman keyring issue.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1701770490 {#1435
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
    "@KISSmyOS@lemmy.world"
    "@hottari@lemmy.ml"
    "@LeFantome@programming.dev"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1671 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1667 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1670 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1678 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1551 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  -id: 198255
  -bodyTs: "'/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':176 'ago':101 'alreadi':171 'also':35 'arch':1,43,70,82,107,170 'aris':12 'aur':25 'began':95 'break':44,58,68 'bug':77 'chang':59 'common':40 'confus':148 'could':177 'disabl':187 'distro':51,88 'downgrad':27 'dumb':156 'easi':8,29 'els':144 'enabl':193 'encount':203 'end':121 'end-up':120 'enough':117 'ever':47,91 'everyth':143 'featur':67 'fedora':72 'feel':161 'fix':10 'good':196 'howev':84 'instal':130,181 'introduc':57 'issu':11,208 'key':125 'keyr':140,184,207 'kind':154 'later':81 'like':162 'linux':97 'mani':98,99 'moon':100 'natur':17 'never':202 'new':151 'note':36 'often':116 'one':18,102 'opinion':159 'outdat':124,205 'packag':26,30,132 'pacman':206 'pick':73 'prevent':127 'problem':108 'rare':46 'reason':41 'refresh':185 'releas':16 'roll':15 'rollback':32 'see':62 'servic':186 'sinc':93 'solid':87 'solut':134 'stabl':4 'system':164 'thing':103 'updat':115,138,142 'upstream':55,66 'use':92,96 'user':152 'util':23 've':90,190,201 'version':31 'way':21 'weeks/month':80 'wiki.archlinux.org':175 'wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman/package_signing#upgrade_system_regularly).':174"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.ml/comment/6391241"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701770490 {#1438
    date: 2023-12-05 11:01:30.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 198255
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
9 DENIED ROLE_ADMIN 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
10 DENIED ROLE_MODERATOR 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details