Symfony Profiler

{
    "@context": [
        "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
    ],
    "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux",
    "to": [
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
    ],
    "object": {
        "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/activities\/update\/5b299e76-642a-4359-8b6d-6ef2de28e44d",
        "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/u\/ganymede",
        "to": [
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
        ],
        "object": {
            "type": "Note",
            "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/comment\/17529845",
            "attributedTo": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/u\/ganymede",
            "to": [
                "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
            ],
            "cc": [
                "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux",
                "https:\/\/sh.itjust.works\/u\/priapus"
            ],
            "content": "<blockquote>\n<p>Or they\u2019re just adding improvements to the software they heavily rely on.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>which they can do in private any time they wish, without any of the fanfare.<\/p>\n<p>if they actually believe in opensource let them opensource windows 7, or idk the 1\/4 of a <strong>century<\/strong> old windows 2k ^1^<\/p>\n<p>instead we get the fanare as they pat themselves on the back for opensourcing MS-DOS 4.0 early last year (not even 8.0, which is 24 years old btw, 4.0 which came out in 1986).<\/p>\n<p>2024 - 1986 = 38 years<\/p>\n<p>MS-fucking-DOS, from 38 years ago, THAT\u2019S how much they give a shit about opensource mate.<\/p>\n<p>instead all we get is a poor pantomime which actually only illustrates just how stupid they truly think we are to believe the charade.<\/p>\n<p>does any of that mean they\u2019re 100% have to be actively shipping \u201cbad code\u201d in this project, not by any means. does it mean microsoft will never make a useful contribution to linux, not by any means. what it does mean is they\u2019re increasing their sphere of influence over the project. and they have absolutely no incentive to help anyone but themselves, in fact the opposite.<\/p>\n<p>as everyone knows (it\u2019s not some deep secret the tech heads on lemmy somehow didn\u2019t hear about) microsoft is highly dependent on linux for their major revenue streams. anything a monolith depends on which they don\u2019t control represents a risk. they\u2019d be negligent if they didn\u2019t try to exert control over it. and that\u2019s for <strong>any<\/strong> organisation in their position. then factor in their widespread outspoken agenda against opensource, embrace, extend, extinguish and the vastly lacking longterm evidence to match their claims of &lt;3 opensource.<\/p>\n<p>they\u2019re welcome to prove us all wrong, but that isn\u2019t even on the horizon currently - let alone demonstrated. until it is, head in the sand optimism isn\u2019t helping anyone except microsoft.<\/p>\n<p>^1^ yes yes they claim they can\u2019t because \u201clicensing\u201d, which is mostly but not entirely fucking flimsy, but ok devils advocate: release the rest, but nah.<\/p>\n",
            "inReplyTo": "https:\/\/sh.itjust.works\/comment\/17564611",
            "mediaType": "text\/html",
            "source": {
                "content": "> Or they\u2019re just adding improvements to the software they heavily rely on.\n\nwhich they can do in private any time they wish, without any of the fanfare.\n\nif they actually believe in opensource let them opensource windows 7, or idk the 1\/4 of a **century** old windows 2k ^1^\n\ninstead we get the fanare as they pat themselves on the back for opensourcing MS-DOS 4.0 early last year (not even 8.0, which is 24 years old btw, 4.0 which came out in 1986).\n\n2024 - 1986 = 38 years\n\nMS-fucking-DOS, from 38 years ago, THAT'S how much they give a shit about opensource mate. \n\ninstead all we get is a poor pantomime which actually only illustrates just how stupid they truly think we are to believe the charade.\n\n\ndoes any of that mean they're 100% have to be actively shipping \"bad code\" in this project, not by any means. does it mean microsoft will never make a useful contribution to linux, not by any means. what it does mean is they're increasing their sphere of influence over the project. and they have absolutely no incentive to help anyone but themselves, in fact the opposite.\n\nas everyone knows (it's not some deep secret the tech heads on lemmy somehow didn't hear about) microsoft is highly dependent on linux for their major revenue streams. anything a monolith depends on which they don't control represents a risk. they'd be negligent if they didn't try to exert control over it. and that's for **any** organisation in their position. then factor in their widespread outspoken agenda against opensource, embrace, extend, extinguish and the vastly lacking longterm evidence to match their claims of <3 opensource.\n\nthey're welcome to prove us all wrong, but that isn't even on the horizon currently - let alone demonstrated. until it is, head in the sand optimism isn't helping anyone except microsoft.\n\n^1^ yes yes they claim they can't because \"licensing\", which is mostly but not entirely fucking flimsy, but ok devils advocate: release the rest, but nah.",
                "mediaType": "text\/markdown"
            },
            "published": "2025-03-26T05:24:53.184528Z",
            "updated": "2025-03-26T05:30:03.958088Z",
            "tag": [
                {
                    "href": "https:\/\/sh.itjust.works\/u\/priapus",
                    "name": "@priapus@sh.itjust.works",
                    "type": "Mention"
                }
            ],
            "distinguished": false,
            "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux",
            "attachment": []
        },
        "cc": [
            "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux",
            "https:\/\/sh.itjust.works\/u\/priapus"
        ],
        "tag": [
            {
                "href": "https:\/\/sh.itjust.works\/u\/priapus",
                "name": "@priapus@sh.itjust.works",
                "type": "Mention"
            }
        ],
        "type": "Update",
        "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux"
    },
    "cc": [
        "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/c\/linux\/followers"
    ],
    "type": "Announce",
    "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.ml\/activities\/announce\/update\/22d5712d-7d0d-4757-8729-5a26bdbb5655"
}

{"@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"actor":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"id":"https://lemmy.ml/activities/update/5b299e76-642a-4359-8b6d-6ef2de28e44d","actor":"https://lemmy.ml/u/ganymede","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"type":"Note","id":"https://lemmy.ml/comment/17529845","attributedTo":"https://lemmy.ml/u/ganymede","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","https://sh.itjust.works/u/priapus"],"content":"<blockquote>\n<p>Or they’re just adding improvements to the software they heavily rely on.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>which they can do in private any time they wish, without any of the fanfare.</p>\n<p>if they actually believe in opensource let them opensource windows 7, or idk the 1/4 of a <strong>century</strong> old windows 2k ^1^</p>\n<p>instead we get the fanare as they pat themselves on the back for opensourcing MS-DOS 4.0 early last year (not even 8.0, which is 24 years old btw, 4.0 which came out in 1986).</p>\n<p>2024 - 1986 = 38 years</p>\n<p>MS-fucking-DOS, from 38 years ago, THAT’S how much they give a shit about opensource mate.</p>\n<p>instead all we get is a poor pantomime which actually only illustrates just how stupid they truly think we are to believe the charade.</p>\n<p>does any of that mean they’re 100% have to be actively shipping “bad code” in this project, not by any means. does it mean microsoft will never make a useful contribution to linux, not by any means. what it does mean is they’re increasing their sphere of influence over the project. and they have absolutely no incentive to help anyone but themselves, in fact the opposite.</p>\n<p>as everyone knows (it’s not some deep secret the tech heads on lemmy somehow didn’t hear about) microsoft is highly dependent on linux for their major revenue streams. anything a monolith depends on which they don’t control represents a risk. they’d be negligent if they didn’t try to exert control over it. and that’s for <strong>any</strong> organisation in their position. then factor in their widespread outspoken agenda against opensource, embrace, extend, extinguish and the vastly lacking longterm evidence to match their claims of &lt;3 opensource.</p>\n<p>they’re welcome to prove us all wrong, but that isn’t even on the horizon currently - let alone demonstrated. until it is, head in the sand optimism isn’t helping anyone except microsoft.</p>\n<p>^1^ yes yes they claim they can’t because “licensing”, which is mostly but not entirely fucking flimsy, but ok devils advocate: release the rest, but nah.</p>\n","inReplyTo":"https://sh.itjust.works/comment/17564611","mediaType":"text/html","source":{"content":"> Or they’re just adding improvements to the software they heavily rely on.\n\nwhich they can do in private any time they wish, without any of the fanfare.\n\nif they actually believe in opensource let them opensource windows 7, or idk the 1/4 of a **century** old windows 2k ^1^\n\ninstead we get the fanare as they pat themselves on the back for opensourcing MS-DOS 4.0 early last year (not even 8.0, which is 24 years old btw, 4.0 which came out in 1986).\n\n2024 - 1986 = 38 years\n\nMS-fucking-DOS, from 38 years ago, THAT'S how much they give a shit about opensource mate. \n\ninstead all we get is a poor pantomime which actually only illustrates just how stupid they truly think we are to believe the charade.\n\n\ndoes any of that mean they're 100% have to be actively shipping \"bad code\" in this project, not by any means. does it mean microsoft will never make a useful contribution to linux, not by any means. what it does mean is they're increasing their sphere of influence over the project. and they have absolutely no incentive to help anyone but themselves, in fact the opposite.\n\nas everyone knows (it's not some deep secret the tech heads on lemmy somehow didn't hear about) microsoft is highly dependent on linux for their major revenue streams. anything a monolith depends on which they don't control represents a risk. they'd be negligent if they didn't try to exert control over it. and that's for **any** organisation in their position. then factor in their widespread outspoken agenda against opensource, embrace, extend, extinguish and the vastly lacking longterm evidence to match their claims of <3 opensource.\n\nthey're welcome to prove us all wrong, but that isn't even on the horizon currently - let alone demonstrated. until it is, head in the sand optimism isn't helping anyone except microsoft.\n\n^1^ yes yes they claim they can't because \"licensing\", which is mostly but not entirely fucking flimsy, but ok devils advocate: release the rest, but nah.","mediaType":"text/markdown"},"published":"2025-03-26T05:24:53.184528Z","updated":"2025-03-26T05:30:03.958088Z","tag":[{"href":"https://sh.itjust.works/u/priapus","name":"@priapus@sh.itjust.works","type":"Mention"}],"distinguished":false,"audience":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","attachment":[]},"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","https://sh.itjust.works/u/priapus"],"tag":[{"href":"https://sh.itjust.works/u/priapus","name":"@priapus@sh.itjust.works","type":"Mention"}],"type":"Update","audience":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux"},"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux/followers"],"type":"Announce","id":"https://lemmy.ml/activities/announce/update/22d5712d-7d0d-4757-8729-5a26bdbb5655"}