GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/u/@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org

Response
200 OK
IP
18.188.144.48
Profiled on
Token
2a79ca

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 0.33 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.08 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
  +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
  +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Have any thoughts?\n
    \n
    I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
    date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        In what context?\n
        \n
        Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
        \n
        ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
        date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
      -id: 7922
      -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
        date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7922
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      +body: """
        Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
        \n
        These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
        \n
        This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
        \n
        In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
        \n
        That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
      -id: 7924
      -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7924
    }
  ]
  -id: 818
  -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
  -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1688475849
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
  +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
  +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Have any thoughts?\n
    \n
    I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
    date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        In what context?\n
        \n
        Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
        \n
        ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
        date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
      -id: 7922
      -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
        date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7922
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      +body: """
        Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
        \n
        These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
        \n
        This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
        \n
        In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
        \n
        That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
      -id: 7924
      -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7924
    }
  ]
  -id: 818
  -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
  -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1688475849
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
  +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
  +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Have any thoughts?\n
    \n
    I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
    date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        In what context?\n
        \n
        Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
        \n
        ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
        date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
      -id: 7922
      -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
        date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7922
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
      +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      +body: """
        Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
        \n
        These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
        \n
        This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
        \n
        In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
        \n
        That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 0
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
      -id: 7924
      -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
        date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 7924
    }
  ]
  -id: 818
  -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
  -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1688475849
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
        +body: """
          Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
          \n
          These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
          \n
          This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
          \n
          In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
          \n
          That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
          "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
        -id: 7924
        -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7924
      }
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    In what context?\n
    \n
    Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
    \n
    ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
    date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
  -id: 7922
  -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
    date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7922
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
        +body: """
          Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
          \n
          These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
          \n
          This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
          \n
          In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
          \n
          That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
          "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
        -id: 7924
        -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7924
      }
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    In what context?\n
    \n
    Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
    \n
    ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
    date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
  -id: 7922
  -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
    date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7922
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
        +body: """
          Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
          \n
          These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
          \n
          This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
          \n
          In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
          \n
          That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
          "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
        -id: 7924
        -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
          date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7924
      }
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    In what context?\n
    \n
    Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
    \n
    ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
    date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
  -id: 7922
  -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
    date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7922
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
9 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
10 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          In what context?\n
          \n
          Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
          \n
          ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
          date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
        -id: 7922
        -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
          date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7922
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527}
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
  +body: """
    Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
    \n
    These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
    \n
    This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
    \n
    In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
    \n
    That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
    "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
  -id: 7924
  -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7924
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
11 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          In what context?\n
          \n
          Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
          \n
          ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
          date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
        -id: 7922
        -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
          date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7922
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527}
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
  +body: """
    Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
    \n
    These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
    \n
    This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
    \n
    In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
    \n
    That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
    "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
  -id: 7924
  -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7924
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
12 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527
  +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2470 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1548 …}
    +slug: "Should-a-persons-susceptibility-to-fasicsm-be-identified"
    +title: "Should a persons susceptibility to fasicsm be identified?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Have any thoughts?\n
      \n
      I’m just ruminating and would welcome perspectives to bounce off
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 4
    +favouriteCount: 0
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1688505128 {#1719
      date: 2023-07-04 23:12:08.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1559 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696
        +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1571 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          In what context?\n
          \n
          Who’d be doing the identifying, how would they be doing it, and what would they be using that information for?\n
          \n
          ‘Should’ is a question of desirability, so the above is really critically important.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 0
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1688508435 {#1428
          date: 2023-07-05 00:07:15.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1588 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1584 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1580 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1583 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
        -id: 7922
        -bodyTs: "'context':3 'critic':36 'd':5 'desir':30 'identifi':9 'import':37 'inform':23 'question':28 'realli':35 'use':21 'would':11,18"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/564654"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688460825 {#1440
          date: 2023-07-04 10:53:45.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 7922
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1527}
    ]
    -id: 818
    -titleTs: "'fasicsm':6 'identifi':8 'person':3 'suscept':4"
    -bodyTs: "'bounc':13 'm':5 'perspect':11 'rumin':7 'thought':3 'welcom':10 'would':9"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1688475849
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://beehaw.org/post/945695"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688459849 {#1698
      date: 2023-07-04 10:37:29.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1572 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1705 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1696}
  +body: """
    Well, one context I’m already familiar with is the counter-terrorism duty in the UK. There is a program called [Prevent](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales) that is designed to tackle radicalisation risk that could result in terrorism or non-violent extremism.\n
    \n
    These programs basically work by placing a duty on certain types of organisation to report concerning behaviours that could result in radicalisation. An example would be a teacher or social worker overhearing a teenager espousing violent ideological positions that they’d been exposed to online.\n
    \n
    This then results in a referral to the local counter-terrorism police unit, who carry out an assessment to determine the level of vulnerability and risk. Far-right ideologies including fascism can be accounted for here. Depending on the outcome, this may result in the referral being closed, or a multi-agency support plan being developed for the individual.\n
    \n
    In that narrow band of circumstances, determining someone’s susceptibility to fascism as an extremist ideology is warranted. That’s in the context of a reactive specialist law enforcement assessment, when there is a justifiable national security interest in the prevention of terrorism.\n
    \n
    That said, this is very different to indiscriminate profiling on a population level. If *everyone* in the UK was subject to mandatory fascism assessments, that would be massively intrusive and disproportionate, and an enormous infringement of civil liberties - even if the government attempted to justify it on the same national security basis described above.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1688467629 {#1669
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@bear_delune@beehaw.org"
    "@GeneralRetreat@beehaw.org"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1596 …}
  -id: 7924
  -bodyTs: "'/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':26 'account':124 'agenc':143 'alreadi':6 'assess':107,180,217 'attempt':236 'band':154 'basi':245 'basic':46 'behaviour':60 'call':22 'carri':104 'certain':53 'circumst':156 'civil':230 'close':138 'concern':59 'context':3,173 'could':35,62 'counter':12,99 'counter-terror':11,98 'd':84 'depend':127 'describ':246 'design':29 'determin':109,157 'develop':147 'differ':199 'disproportion':224 'duti':14,51 'enforc':179 'enorm':227 'espous':78 'even':232 'everyon':208 'exampl':67 'expos':86 'extrem':43 'extremist':165 'familiar':7 'far':117 'far-right':116 'fascism':121,162,216 'govern':235 'ideolog':80,119,166 'includ':120 'indiscrimin':201 'individu':150 'infring':228 'interest':188 'intrus':222 'justifi':185,238 'law':178 'level':111,206 'liberti':231 'local':97 'm':5 'mandatori':215 'massiv':221 'may':132 'multi':142 'multi-ag':141 'narrow':153 'nation':186,243 'non':41 'non-viol':40 'one':2 'onlin':88 'organis':56 'outcom':130 'overhear':75 'place':49 'plan':145 'polic':101 'popul':205 'posit':81 'prevent':23,191 'profil':202 'program':21,45 'radicalis':32,65 'reactiv':176 'referr':94,136 'report':58 'result':36,63,91,133 'right':118 'risk':33,115 'said':195 'secur':187,244 'social':73 'someon':158 'specialist':177 'subject':213 'support':144 'suscept':160 'tackl':31 'teacher':71 'teenag':77 'terror':13,38,100,193 'type':54 'uk':17,211 'unit':102 'violent':42,79 'vulner':113 'warrant':168 'well':1 'work':47 'worker':74 'would':68,219 'www.gov.uk':25 'www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales)':24"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/565182"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1688467629 {#1528
    date: 2023-07-04 12:47:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 7924
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
13 DENIED ROLE_ADMIN 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
14 DENIED ROLE_MODERATOR 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details