GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/u/@fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com/threads/top/%E2%88%9E/articles

Response
200 OK
IP
216.73.217.10
Profiled on
Token
36290c

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 19.66 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.07 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Entry {#2455
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2468 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "Using-a-VPN-to-California-or-Colorado-to-increase-privacy"
  +title: "Using a VPN to California or Colorado to increase privacy"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    An interesting tidbit from Mozilla’s latest privacy release ([ghacks.net/…/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive…](https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):\n
    \n
    > The first introduces support for the Global Privacy Control in Settings. The privacy feature informs websites that you visit that you don’t want your data sold or shared. It is legally binding in some states in the United States, including in California and Colorado.\n
    \n
    What’s to stop users from utilizing a VPN exit point in California or Colorado to force the binding nature of the request?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 9
  +favouriteCount: 37
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700704899 {#2462
    date: 2023-11-23 03:01:39.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 15302
  -titleTs: "'california':5 'colorado':7 'increas':9 'privaci':10 'use':1 'vpn':3"
  -bodyTs: "'/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':14 '/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive':11 'bind':47,78 'california':57,72 'colorado':59,74 'control':23 'data':40 'exit':69 'featur':28 'first':16 'forc':76 'ghacks.net':10 'global':21 'includ':55 'inform':29 'interest':2 'introduc':17 'latest':7 'legal':46 'mozilla':5 'natur':79 'point':70 'privaci':8,22,27 'releas':9 'request':82 'set':25 'share':43 'sold':41 'state':50,54 'stop':63 'support':18 'tidbit':3 'unit':53 'user':64 'util':66 'visit':33 'vpn':68 'want':38 'websit':30 'www.ghacks.net':13 'www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700704690
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/2442780"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700618290 {#2411
    date: 2023-11-22 02:58:10.0 +01:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\Entry {#2455
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2468 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "Using-a-VPN-to-California-or-Colorado-to-increase-privacy"
  +title: "Using a VPN to California or Colorado to increase privacy"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    An interesting tidbit from Mozilla’s latest privacy release ([ghacks.net/…/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive…](https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):\n
    \n
    > The first introduces support for the Global Privacy Control in Settings. The privacy feature informs websites that you visit that you don’t want your data sold or shared. It is legally binding in some states in the United States, including in California and Colorado.\n
    \n
    What’s to stop users from utilizing a VPN exit point in California or Colorado to force the binding nature of the request?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 9
  +favouriteCount: 37
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700704899 {#2462
    date: 2023-11-23 03:01:39.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 15302
  -titleTs: "'california':5 'colorado':7 'increas':9 'privaci':10 'use':1 'vpn':3"
  -bodyTs: "'/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':14 '/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive':11 'bind':47,78 'california':57,72 'colorado':59,74 'control':23 'data':40 'exit':69 'featur':28 'first':16 'forc':76 'ghacks.net':10 'global':21 'includ':55 'inform':29 'interest':2 'introduc':17 'latest':7 'legal':46 'mozilla':5 'natur':79 'point':70 'privaci':8,22,27 'releas':9 'request':82 'set':25 'share':43 'sold':41 'state':50,54 'stop':63 'support':18 'tidbit':3 'unit':53 'user':64 'util':66 'visit':33 'vpn':68 'want':38 'websit':30 'www.ghacks.net':13 'www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700704690
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/2442780"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700618290 {#2411
    date: 2023-11-22 02:58:10.0 +01:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Entry {#2455
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2468 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "Using-a-VPN-to-California-or-Colorado-to-increase-privacy"
  +title: "Using a VPN to California or Colorado to increase privacy"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    An interesting tidbit from Mozilla’s latest privacy release ([ghacks.net/…/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive…](https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):\n
    \n
    > The first introduces support for the Global Privacy Control in Settings. The privacy feature informs websites that you visit that you don’t want your data sold or shared. It is legally binding in some states in the United States, including in California and Colorado.\n
    \n
    What’s to stop users from utilizing a VPN exit point in California or Colorado to force the binding nature of the request?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 9
  +favouriteCount: 37
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700704899 {#2462
    date: 2023-11-23 03:01:39.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 15302
  -titleTs: "'california':5 'colorado':7 'increas':9 'privaci':10 'use':1 'vpn':3"
  -bodyTs: "'/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':14 '/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive':11 'bind':47,78 'california':57,72 'colorado':59,74 'control':23 'data':40 'exit':69 'featur':28 'first':16 'forc':76 'ghacks.net':10 'global':21 'includ':55 'inform':29 'interest':2 'introduc':17 'latest':7 'legal':46 'mozilla':5 'natur':79 'point':70 'privaci':8,22,27 'releas':9 'request':82 'set':25 'share':43 'sold':41 'state':50,54 'stop':63 'support':18 'tidbit':3 'unit':53 'user':64 'util':66 'visit':33 'vpn':68 'want':38 'websit':30 'www.ghacks.net':13 'www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/)):':12"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700704690
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/2442780"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700618290 {#2411
    date: 2023-11-22 02:58:10.0 +01:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Entry {#1528
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1737 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
  +title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
    \n
    I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
    \n
    - Cable A \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    - Cable B \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
    - Cable C \n
        - Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    \n
    **So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 0
  +favouriteCount: 10
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1420
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1711 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1741 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 2212
  -titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
  -bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1694728728
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1648
    date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1415
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\Entry {#1528
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1737 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
  +title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
    \n
    I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
    \n
    - Cable A \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    - Cable B \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
    - Cable C \n
        - Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    \n
    **So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 0
  +favouriteCount: 10
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1420
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1711 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1741 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 2212
  -titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
  -bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1694728728
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1648
    date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1415
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Entry {#1528
  +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1737 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1692 …}
  +slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
  +title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
    \n
    I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
    \n
    - Cable A \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    - Cable B \n
        - Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
    - Cable C \n
        - Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
        - Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
        - Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
    \n
    **So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 0
  +favouriteCount: 10
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1420
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1711 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1741 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 2212
  -titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
  -bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1694728728
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1648
    date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1415
    date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details