1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2372 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2364 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2447 …}
+slug: "Why-do-people-not-understand-that-you-can-agree-with"
+title: "Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for?"
+url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQPiLs2Mmw"
+body: """
An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work.\n
\n
People (who hate JP) freak out when I quote him and say “Why tf are you quoting Jordan Peterson? Are you a *insert thing that Jordan Peterson is*?” And I’m like “No, I generally disagree with him on most points, aside from this one thing.” But they don’t believe or accept it and assume that I must be a #1 Jordan Peterson fan or something.\n
\n
I think it can be considered a partial agreement, majority disagreement. Or a partial agreement with a person you generally disagree with. But I’d be open to other terms of how to describe this in a way people can understand.\n
\n
Also, to avoid the controversy of referencing Jordan Peterson, if anyone has a better summary of the same concept explained by a different person in a way as well as he does, that would be appreciated too.
"""
+type: "video"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707745871 {#1619
date: 2024-02-12 14:51:11.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
]
-id: 24154
-titleTs: "'agre':9 'disagre':18 'major':21 'one':11 'peopl':3 'said':14 'someon':13 'stand':25 'thing':12 'understand':5"
-bodyTs: "'1':106 'accept':97 'agreement':120,126 'also':153 'anyon':163 'appreci':188 'asid':86 'assum':100 'avoid':155 'believ':95 'better':166 'concept':171 'consid':117 'controversi':157 'd':136 'describ':145 'despis':7 'differ':175 'disagr':122 'disagre':80,132 'doesn':42 'exampl':2 'explain':172 'fan':109 'freak':49 'general':6,79,131 'good':36 'hate':47 'insert':67 'jordan':8,23,62,70,107,160 'jp':48 'like':76 'link':28 'm':75 'major':121 'must':103 'often':18 'one':20,89 'open':138 'partial':119,125 'peopl':45,150 'person':129,176 'peterson':9,24,63,71,108,161 'point':85 'posit':41 'quot':19,53,61 'referenc':159 'said':25 'say':15,56 'someth':111 'summari':37,167 'term':141 'tf':58 'thing':21,68,90 'think':32,113 'toxic':40 'understand':152 'video':29 'way':149,179 'well':181 'work':44 'would':186"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703388337
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9883787"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703301937 {#1645
date: 2023-12-23 04:25:37.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1593 …}
+body: """
> nuance doesn’t exist\n
\n
I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703320825 {#1698
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Lafari@lemmy.world"
"@ilmagico@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1661 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1564 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
-id: 247540
-bodyTs: "'doesn':2 'exist':4 'littl':10 'nuanc':1,12 'think':6"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/5889239"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703320825 {#1609
date: 2023-12-23 09:40:25.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 247540
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|