1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2079
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1907 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2384 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1404 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1363 …}
+body: """
This would be awesome, but I just don’t see it happening this way. They have to work with the copyright holders who set those kinds of terms and who have the majority of the leverage in negotiating those terms. Unfortunately, I don’t see any reason this kind of deal would be made.\n
\n
The business model is to force consumers to purchase and repurchase the same content over and over. Changing only the format, or distribution method, or platform of consumption. This kind of deal would undercut that business model.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705787476 {#2062
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca"
"@Resol@lemmy.world"
"@ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
-id: 326608
-bodyTs: "'awesom':4 'busi':56,90 'chang':72 'consum':61 'consumpt':82 'content':68 'copyright':21 'deal':51,86 'distribut':77 'forc':60 'format':75 'happen':12 'holder':22 'kind':26,49,84 'leverag':36 'made':54 'major':33 'method':78 'model':57,91 'negoti':38 'platform':80 'purchas':63 'reason':47 'repurchas':65 'see':10,45 'set':24 'term':28,40 'undercut':88 'unfortun':41 'way':14 'work':18 'would':2,52,87"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6945263"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705787476 {#1908
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2079
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1907 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2384 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1404 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1363 …}
+body: """
This would be awesome, but I just don’t see it happening this way. They have to work with the copyright holders who set those kinds of terms and who have the majority of the leverage in negotiating those terms. Unfortunately, I don’t see any reason this kind of deal would be made.\n
\n
The business model is to force consumers to purchase and repurchase the same content over and over. Changing only the format, or distribution method, or platform of consumption. This kind of deal would undercut that business model.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705787476 {#2062
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca"
"@Resol@lemmy.world"
"@ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
-id: 326608
-bodyTs: "'awesom':4 'busi':56,90 'chang':72 'consum':61 'consumpt':82 'content':68 'copyright':21 'deal':51,86 'distribut':77 'forc':60 'format':75 'happen':12 'holder':22 'kind':26,49,84 'leverag':36 'made':54 'major':33 'method':78 'model':57,91 'negoti':38 'platform':80 'purchas':63 'reason':47 'repurchas':65 'see':10,45 'set':24 'term':28,40 'undercut':88 'unfortun':41 'way':14 'work':18 'would':2,52,87"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6945263"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705787476 {#1908
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2079
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1907 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2384 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1404 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1363 …}
+body: """
This would be awesome, but I just don’t see it happening this way. They have to work with the copyright holders who set those kinds of terms and who have the majority of the leverage in negotiating those terms. Unfortunately, I don’t see any reason this kind of deal would be made.\n
\n
The business model is to force consumers to purchase and repurchase the same content over and over. Changing only the format, or distribution method, or platform of consumption. This kind of deal would undercut that business model.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705787476 {#2062
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca"
"@Resol@lemmy.world"
"@ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
-id: 326608
-bodyTs: "'awesom':4 'busi':56,90 'chang':72 'consum':61 'consumpt':82 'content':68 'copyright':21 'deal':51,86 'distribut':77 'forc':60 'format':75 'happen':12 'holder':22 'kind':26,49,84 'leverag':36 'made':54 'major':33 'method':78 'model':57,91 'negoti':38 'platform':80 'purchas':63 'reason':47 'repurchas':65 'see':10,45 'set':24 'term':28,40 'undercut':88 'unfortun':41 'way':14 'work':18 'would':2,52,87"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6945263"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705787476 {#1908
date: 2024-01-20 22:51:16.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2133
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2328 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
[www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/…/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf](https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf)\n
\n
The specification exists. It’s not free as in beer. This is really beside the point. Google implemented an RCS messaging client. Your cellular carriers implement the RCS endpoints the clients use.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704667105 {#2078
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
"@thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2340 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2241 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2314 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 289817
-bodyTs: "'/futurenetworks/':3 '/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':7 '/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf':4 'beer':17 'besid':21 'carrier':32 'cellular':31 'client':29,38 'endpoint':36 'exist':10 'free':14 'googl':24 'implement':25,33 'messag':28 'point':23 'rcs':27,35 'realli':20 'specif':9 'use':39 'www.gsma.com':2,6 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/':1 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':5"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6511313"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704667105 {#2097
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2133
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2328 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
[www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/…/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf](https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf)\n
\n
The specification exists. It’s not free as in beer. This is really beside the point. Google implemented an RCS messaging client. Your cellular carriers implement the RCS endpoints the clients use.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704667105 {#2078
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
"@thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2340 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2241 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2314 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 289817
-bodyTs: "'/futurenetworks/':3 '/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':7 '/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf':4 'beer':17 'besid':21 'carrier':32 'cellular':31 'client':29,38 'endpoint':36 'exist':10 'free':14 'googl':24 'implement':25,33 'messag':28 'point':23 'rcs':27,35 'realli':20 'specif':9 'use':39 'www.gsma.com':2,6 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/':1 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':5"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6511313"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704667105 {#2097
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2133
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2328 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
[www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/…/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf](https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/RCC.07-v11.0.pdf)\n
\n
The specification exists. It’s not free as in beer. This is really beside the point. Google implemented an RCS messaging client. Your cellular carriers implement the RCS endpoints the clients use.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704667105 {#2078
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
"@thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2340 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2241 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2314 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
-id: 289817
-bodyTs: "'/futurenetworks/':3 '/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':7 '/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf':4 'beer':17 'besid':21 'carrier':32 'cellular':31 'client':29,38 'endpoint':36 'exist':10 'free':14 'googl':24 'implement':25,33 'messag':28 'point':23 'rcs':27,35 'realli':20 'specif':9 'use':39 'www.gsma.com':2,6 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/':1 'www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rcc.07-v11.0.pdf)':5"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6511313"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704667105 {#2097
date: 2024-01-07 23:38:25.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2042 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: "No. I’m sorry. You can’t just say it and make it true. Please show me how Google owns RCS or prevents other developers from implementing it within their own apps."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704643600 {#2040
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2348 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2346 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2140 …}
-id: 288966
-bodyTs: "'app':32 'develop':25 'googl':19 'implement':27 'm':3 'make':12 'own':20 'pleas':15 'prevent':23 'rcs':21 'say':9 'show':16 'sorri':4 'true':14 'within':29"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502988"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704643600 {#1906
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2042 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: "No. I’m sorry. You can’t just say it and make it true. Please show me how Google owns RCS or prevents other developers from implementing it within their own apps."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704643600 {#2040
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2348 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2346 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2140 …}
-id: 288966
-bodyTs: "'app':32 'develop':25 'googl':19 'implement':27 'm':3 'make':12 'own':20 'pleas':15 'prevent':23 'rcs':21 'say':9 'show':16 'sorri':4 'true':14 'within':29"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502988"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704643600 {#1906
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2164
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2042 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: "No. I’m sorry. You can’t just say it and make it true. Please show me how Google owns RCS or prevents other developers from implementing it within their own apps."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704643600 {#2040
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2348 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2347 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2346 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2330 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2350 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2140 …}
-id: 288966
-bodyTs: "'app':32 'develop':25 'googl':19 'implement':27 'm':3 'make':12 'own':20 'pleas':15 'prevent':23 'rcs':21 'say':9 'show':16 'sorri':4 'true':14 'within':29"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502988"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704643600 {#1906
date: 2024-01-07 17:06:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2094
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Google doesn’t own the RCS protocol. This is like saying they own the SMTP protocol because they provide Gmail. They are just one company that has implemented the protocol in their default text message app. They built end-to-end encryption into their implementation, which is currently closed source. I’m guessing this is what you’re referring to.\n
\n
Anyone *can* implement RCS. It may cost you some money and some time, but it is *possible*. That’s the difference I was originally trying to highlight.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641881 {#2060
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2093 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
-id: 288894
-bodyTs: "'anyon':62 'app':36 'built':38 'close':50 'compani':25 'cost':68 'current':49 'default':33 'differ':82 'doesn':2 'encrypt':43 'end':40,42 'end-to-end':39 'gmail':20 'googl':1 'guess':54 'highlight':88 'implement':28,46,64 'like':10 'm':53 'may':67 'messag':35 'money':71 'one':24 'origin':85 'possibl':78 'protocol':7,16,30 'provid':19 'rcs':6,65 're':59 'refer':60 'say':11 'smtp':15 'sourc':51 'text':34 'time':74 'tri':86"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502473"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641881 {#2331
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2094
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Google doesn’t own the RCS protocol. This is like saying they own the SMTP protocol because they provide Gmail. They are just one company that has implemented the protocol in their default text message app. They built end-to-end encryption into their implementation, which is currently closed source. I’m guessing this is what you’re referring to.\n
\n
Anyone *can* implement RCS. It may cost you some money and some time, but it is *possible*. That’s the difference I was originally trying to highlight.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641881 {#2060
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2093 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
-id: 288894
-bodyTs: "'anyon':62 'app':36 'built':38 'close':50 'compani':25 'cost':68 'current':49 'default':33 'differ':82 'doesn':2 'encrypt':43 'end':40,42 'end-to-end':39 'gmail':20 'googl':1 'guess':54 'highlight':88 'implement':28,46,64 'like':10 'm':53 'may':67 'messag':35 'money':71 'one':24 'origin':85 'possibl':78 'protocol':7,16,30 'provid':19 'rcs':6,65 're':59 'refer':60 'say':11 'smtp':15 'sourc':51 'text':34 'time':74 'tri':86"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502473"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641881 {#2331
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2094
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2092 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Google doesn’t own the RCS protocol. This is like saying they own the SMTP protocol because they provide Gmail. They are just one company that has implemented the protocol in their default text message app. They built end-to-end encryption into their implementation, which is currently closed source. I’m guessing this is what you’re referring to.\n
\n
Anyone *can* implement RCS. It may cost you some money and some time, but it is *possible*. That’s the difference I was originally trying to highlight.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641881 {#2060
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
"@EvokerKing@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2093 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2086 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
-id: 288894
-bodyTs: "'anyon':62 'app':36 'built':38 'close':50 'compani':25 'cost':68 'current':49 'default':33 'differ':82 'doesn':2 'encrypt':43 'end':40,42 'end-to-end':39 'gmail':20 'googl':1 'guess':54 'highlight':88 'implement':28,46,64 'like':10 'm':53 'may':67 'messag':35 'money':71 'one':24 'origin':85 'possibl':78 'protocol':7,16,30 'provid':19 'rcs':6,65 're':59 'refer':60 'say':11 'smtp':15 'sourc':51 'text':34 'time':74 'tri':86"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502473"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641881 {#2331
date: 2024-01-07 16:38:01.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
17 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
18 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2343
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2337 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Are you sure about that?\n
\n
> In early 2020, it was estimated that RCS was available from 88 operators in 59 countries with approximately 390 million users per month.\n
\n
[en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Rich_Communication_Services](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services)
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641067 {#2130
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2336 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2135 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2137 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
-id: 288860
-bodyTs: "'/rich_communication_services':30 '/wiki/rich_communication_services)':33 '2020':8 '390':24 '59':20 '88':17 'approxim':23 'avail':15 'countri':21 'earli':7 'en.m.wikipedia.org':29,32 'en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/rich_communication_services)':31 'estim':11 'million':25 'month':28 'oper':18 'per':27 'rcs':13 'sure':3 'user':26"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502267"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641067 {#2129
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
19 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2343
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2337 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Are you sure about that?\n
\n
> In early 2020, it was estimated that RCS was available from 88 operators in 59 countries with approximately 390 million users per month.\n
\n
[en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Rich_Communication_Services](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services)
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641067 {#2130
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2336 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2135 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2137 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
-id: 288860
-bodyTs: "'/rich_communication_services':30 '/wiki/rich_communication_services)':33 '2020':8 '390':24 '59':20 '88':17 'approxim':23 'avail':15 'countri':21 'earli':7 'en.m.wikipedia.org':29,32 'en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/rich_communication_services)':31 'estim':11 'million':25 'month':28 'oper':18 'per':27 'rcs':13 'sure':3 'user':26"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502267"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641067 {#2129
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
20 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2343
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2337 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
Are you sure about that?\n
\n
> In early 2020, it was estimated that RCS was available from 88 operators in 59 countries with approximately 390 million users per month.\n
\n
[en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Rich_Communication_Services](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services)
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 2
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704641067 {#2130
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
"@brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@kzhe@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2336 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2339 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2159 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2135 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2137 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2068 …}
-id: 288860
-bodyTs: "'/rich_communication_services':30 '/wiki/rich_communication_services)':33 '2020':8 '390':24 '59':20 '88':17 'approxim':23 'avail':15 'countri':21 'earli':7 'en.m.wikipedia.org':29,32 'en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/rich_communication_services)':31 'estim':11 'million':25 'month':28 'oper':18 'per':27 'rcs':13 'sure':3 'user':26"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6502267"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704641067 {#2129
date: 2024-01-07 16:24:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
21 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
22 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2074
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2066 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
> but doesn’t play nice with apple.\n
\n
This isn’t technically wrong, but to be clear, iMessage is closed source. No one can play nice with Apple, in that regard.\n
\n
RCS on the other hand is a more open standard that anyone is free to implement and use. It just doesn’t come with end-to-end encryption as a part of the standard.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 34
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704613139 {#2081
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2070 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2056 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2046 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2045 …}
-id: 288013
-bodyTs: "'anyon':42 'appl':7,27 'clear':16 'close':19 'come':53 'doesn':2,51 'encrypt':59 'end':56,58 'end-to-end':55 'free':44 'hand':35 'imessag':17 'implement':46 'isn':9 'nice':5,25 'one':22 'open':39 'part':62 'play':4,24 'rcs':31 'regard':30 'sourc':20 'standard':40,65 'technic':11 'use':48 'wrong':12"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6496788"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704613139 {#2077
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
23 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2074
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2066 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
> but doesn’t play nice with apple.\n
\n
This isn’t technically wrong, but to be clear, iMessage is closed source. No one can play nice with Apple, in that regard.\n
\n
RCS on the other hand is a more open standard that anyone is free to implement and use. It just doesn’t come with end-to-end encryption as a part of the standard.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 34
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704613139 {#2081
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2070 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2056 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2046 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2045 …}
-id: 288013
-bodyTs: "'anyon':42 'appl':7,27 'clear':16 'close':19 'come':53 'doesn':2,51 'encrypt':59 'end':56,58 'end-to-end':55 'free':44 'hand':35 'imessag':17 'implement':46 'isn':9 'nice':5,25 'one':22 'open':39 'part':62 'play':4,24 'rcs':31 'regard':30 'sourc':20 'standard':40,65 'technic':11 'use':48 'wrong':12"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6496788"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704613139 {#2077
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
24 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2074
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2351 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2329 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2066 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2085 …}
+body: """
> but doesn’t play nice with apple.\n
\n
This isn’t technically wrong, but to be clear, iMessage is closed source. No one can play nice with Apple, in that regard.\n
\n
RCS on the other hand is a more open standard that anyone is free to implement and use. It just doesn’t come with end-to-end encryption as a part of the standard.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 34
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704613139 {#2081
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Tixanou@lemmy.world"
"@Atropos@lemmy.world"
"@Tire@lemmy.ml"
"@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
"@TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2071 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2070 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2048 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2056 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2046 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2045 …}
-id: 288013
-bodyTs: "'anyon':42 'appl':7,27 'clear':16 'close':19 'come':53 'doesn':2,51 'encrypt':59 'end':56,58 'end-to-end':55 'free':44 'hand':35 'imessag':17 'implement':46 'isn':9 'nice':5,25 'one':22 'open':39 'part':62 'play':4,24 'rcs':31 'regard':30 'sourc':20 'standard':40,65 'technic':11 'use':48 'wrong':12"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/6496788"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704613139 {#2077
date: 2024-01-07 08:38:59.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|