1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3251
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3325 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3274 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: """
*grasps pearls around neck*\n
\n
Imagine the scandel!
"""
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1701945836 {#3249
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
"@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3252 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3254 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3338 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3328 …}
-id: 896
-bodyTs: "'around':3 'grasp':1 'imagin':5 'neck':4 'pearl':2 'scandel':7"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/4891558"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701945836 {#3250
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3251
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3325 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3274 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: """
*grasps pearls around neck*\n
\n
Imagine the scandel!
"""
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1701945836 {#3249
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
"@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3252 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3254 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3338 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3328 …}
-id: 896
-bodyTs: "'around':3 'grasp':1 'imagin':5 'neck':4 'pearl':2 'scandel':7"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/4891558"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701945836 {#3250
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3251
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3325 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3274 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: """
*grasps pearls around neck*\n
\n
Imagine the scandel!
"""
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1701945836 {#3249
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
"@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3252 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3254 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3338 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3339 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3326 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3328 …}
-id: 896
-bodyTs: "'around':3 'grasp':1 'imagin':5 'neck':4 'pearl':2 'scandel':7"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/4891558"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701945836 {#3250
date: 2023-12-07 11:43:56.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3332
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3342 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: "The worlds on a role at this point"
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#3330
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3341 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3334 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3336 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3344 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3346 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3348 …}
-id: 899
-bodyTs: "'point':8 'role':5 'world':2"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/comment/5375892"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702101329 {#3331
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3332
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3342 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: "The worlds on a role at this point"
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#3330
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3341 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3334 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3336 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3344 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3346 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3348 …}
-id: 899
-bodyTs: "'point':8 'role':5 'world':2"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/comment/5375892"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702101329 {#3331
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\PostComment {#3332
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#3342 …}
+post: App\Entity\Post {#2018
+user: App\Entity\User {#263 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+image: null
+slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
+body: """
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
\n
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
\n
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
\n
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
\n
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
\n
#fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
"""
+lang: "en"
+commentCount: 4
+favouriteCount: 20
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#2372
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: [
"fisa"
"surveillance"
]
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1383 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+children: []
-id: 316
-bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701963627
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2455
date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2471 …}
+parent: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+root: App\Entity\PostComment {#3262 …}
+image: null
+body: "The worlds on a role at this point"
+lang: "en"
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#3330
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
"@privacy@lemmy.ml"
"@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange"
"@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone"
]
+isAdult: false
+updateMark: false
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3341 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3334 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3336 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3344 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3346 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#3348 …}
-id: 899
-bodyTs: "'point':8 'role':5 'world':2"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/comment/5375892"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702101329 {#3331
date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|