1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1581
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2461 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1611 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "6-2-1-2"
+title: "6÷2(1+2)"
+url: "https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1ff1dbb1-0e4c-4cc6-80c0-0c71869ebe46.jpeg"
+body: """
[zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)\n
\n
I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.\n
\n
It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)
"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 242
+favouriteCount: 801
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1711667888 {#1734
date: 2024-03-29 00:18:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1615}
]
-id: 21759
-titleTs: "'+2':4 '1':3 '2':2 '6':1"
-bodyTs: "'/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':3 '30min':37 'advanc':43 'ambigu':32 'bias':72 'blog':9 'convinc':27 'discuss':64 'especi':21 'feedback':20 'join':62 'long':8 'look':18 'm':70 'math':14 'past':67 'peopl':23 'post':10 'probabl':71 'problem':15,30 'read':38,51 'realli':46 'take':47 'thank':40 'think':55 'time':49 'viral':13 'worth':58 'wrote':5,75 'zeta.one':2 'zeta.one/viral-math/](https://zeta.one/viral-math/)':1"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702449986
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/post/7145882"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703972491 {#1612
date: 2023-12-30 22:41:31.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702363586 {#1715
date: 2023-12-12 07:46:26.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1551 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
While I agree the problem as written is ambiguous and should be written with explicit operators, I have 1 argument to make. In pretty much every other field if we have a question the answer pretty much always ends up being something along the lines of “well the experts do this” or “this professor at this prestigious university says this”, or “the scientific community says”. The fact that this article even states that academic circles and “scientific” calculators use strong juxtaposition, while basic education and basic calculators use weak juxtaposition is interesting. Why do we treat math differently than pretty much every other field? Shouldn’t strong juxtaposition be the precedent and the norm then just how the scientific community sets precedents for literally every other field? We should start saying weak juxtaposition is wrong and just settle on one.\n
\n
This has been my devil’s advocate argument.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 5
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1704066468 {#1699
date: 2024-01-01 00:47:48.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wischi@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1587 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1574 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1526 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1656 …}
-id: 218539
-bodyTs: "'1':19 'academ':74 'advoc':147 'agre':3 'along':43 'alway':38 'ambigu':9 'answer':35 'argument':20,148 'articl':70 'basic':83,86 'calcul':78,87 'circl':75 'communiti':64,120 'devil':145 'differ':98 'educ':84 'end':39 'even':71 'everi':26,102,125 'expert':49 'explicit':15 'fact':67 'field':28,104,127 'interest':92 'juxtaposit':81,90,108,133 'line':45 'liter':124 'make':22 'math':97 'much':25,37,101 'norm':114 'one':140 'oper':16 'preced':111,122 'prestigi':57 'pretti':24,36,100 'problem':5 'professor':54 'question':33 'say':59,65,131 'scientif':63,77,119 'set':121 'settl':138 'shouldn':105 'someth':42 'start':130 'state':72 'strong':80,107 'treat':96 'univers':58 'use':79,88 'weak':89,132 'well':47 'written':7,13 'wrong':135"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1867182"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702397987 {#1697
date: 2023-12-12 17:19:47.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 218539
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|