1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1560
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1711 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1730 …}
+slug: "Is-BT-over-Tor-still-not-recommened"
+title: "Is BT over Tor still not recommened?"
+url: "https://blog.torproject.org/bittorrent-over-tor-isnt-good-idea/"
+body: "It’s been 13 yesrs after this blog was written. Does the claim still holds true?"
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 77
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699305481 {#1423
date: 2023-11-06 22:18:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+children: []
-id: 9977
-titleTs: "'bt':2 'recommen':7 'still':5 'tor':4"
-bodyTs: "'13':4 'blog':8 'claim':13 'hold':15 'still':14 'true':16 'written':10 'yesr':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699224064
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137678 {#1645
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:18.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137664 {#1424
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:04.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1560
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1711 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1730 …}
+slug: "Is-BT-over-Tor-still-not-recommened"
+title: "Is BT over Tor still not recommened?"
+url: "https://blog.torproject.org/bittorrent-over-tor-isnt-good-idea/"
+body: "It’s been 13 yesrs after this blog was written. Does the claim still holds true?"
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 77
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699305481 {#1423
date: 2023-11-06 22:18:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+children: []
-id: 9977
-titleTs: "'bt':2 'recommen':7 'still':5 'tor':4"
-bodyTs: "'13':4 'blog':8 'claim':13 'hold':15 'still':14 'true':16 'written':10 'yesr':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699224064
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137678 {#1645
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:18.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137664 {#1424
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:04.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1560
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1711 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1730 …}
+slug: "Is-BT-over-Tor-still-not-recommened"
+title: "Is BT over Tor still not recommened?"
+url: "https://blog.torproject.org/bittorrent-over-tor-isnt-good-idea/"
+body: "It’s been 13 yesrs after this blog was written. Does the claim still holds true?"
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 77
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699305481 {#1423
date: 2023-11-06 22:18:01.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2371 …}
+children: []
-id: 9977
-titleTs: "'bt':2 'recommen':7 'still':5 'tor':4"
-bodyTs: "'13':4 'blog':8 'claim':13 'hold':15 'still':14 'true':16 'written':10 'yesr':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699224064
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137678 {#1645
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:18.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699137664 {#1424
date: 2023-11-04 23:41:04.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2372
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2364 …}
+slug: "If-BT-over-Tor-is-bad-for-privacy-why-VPN"
+title: "If BT over Tor is bad for privacy, why VPN is not?"
+url: null
+body: """
This is an continuation of my [last post](https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468), specifically a [comment](https://lemmy.ml/comment/5514226) from @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de:\n
\n
> It will never get recommended. It’s bad for the network and bad for your privacy.\n
\n
Excluding that doing so is bad for the network, why it is “private” using VPN but not Tor, inferring from [common consensus](https://www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn). The main point in the blog post is a protocol level problem:\n
\n
> apparently in some cases uTorrent, BitSpirit, and libTorrent simply write your IP address directly into the information they send to the tracker and/or to other peers\n
\n
Tor and VPN are both transports what wrap other traffic within. If that statement is true, no transport can save the information leaking nature of the BT protocol itself.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 9
+favouriteCount: 14
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699231100 {#2469
date: 2023-11-06 01:38:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rufus@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+children: []
-id: 9996
-titleTs: "'bad':6 'bt':2 'privaci':8 'tor':4 'vpn':10"
-bodyTs: "'/comment/5514226)':17 '/post/7505468),':11 '/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':60 'address':85 'and/or':95 'appar':73 'bad':27,32,41 'bitspirit':78 'blog':66 'bt':125 'case':76 'comment':14 'common':56 'consensus':57 'continu':4 'direct':86 'exclud':36 'get':23 'infer':54 'inform':89,120 'ip':84 'last':7 'leak':121 'lemmy.ml':10,16 'lemmy.ml/comment/5514226)':15 'lemmy.ml/post/7505468),':9 'level':71 'libtorr':80 'main':62 'natur':122 'network':30,44 'never':22 'peer':98 'point':63 'post':8,67 'privaci':35 'privat':48 'problem':72 'protocol':70,126 'recommend':24 'rufus@discuss.tchncs.de':19 'save':118 'send':91 'simpli':81 'specif':12 'statement':112 'tor':53,99 'tracker':94 'traffic':108 'transport':104,116 'true':114 'use':49 'utorr':77 'vpn':50,101 'within':109 'wrap':106 'write':82 'www.techradar.com':59 'www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':58"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699218610
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699145293 {#2459
date: 2023-11-05 01:48:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699143610 {#2361
date: 2023-11-05 01:20:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2372
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2364 …}
+slug: "If-BT-over-Tor-is-bad-for-privacy-why-VPN"
+title: "If BT over Tor is bad for privacy, why VPN is not?"
+url: null
+body: """
This is an continuation of my [last post](https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468), specifically a [comment](https://lemmy.ml/comment/5514226) from @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de:\n
\n
> It will never get recommended. It’s bad for the network and bad for your privacy.\n
\n
Excluding that doing so is bad for the network, why it is “private” using VPN but not Tor, inferring from [common consensus](https://www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn). The main point in the blog post is a protocol level problem:\n
\n
> apparently in some cases uTorrent, BitSpirit, and libTorrent simply write your IP address directly into the information they send to the tracker and/or to other peers\n
\n
Tor and VPN are both transports what wrap other traffic within. If that statement is true, no transport can save the information leaking nature of the BT protocol itself.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 9
+favouriteCount: 14
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699231100 {#2469
date: 2023-11-06 01:38:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rufus@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+children: []
-id: 9996
-titleTs: "'bad':6 'bt':2 'privaci':8 'tor':4 'vpn':10"
-bodyTs: "'/comment/5514226)':17 '/post/7505468),':11 '/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':60 'address':85 'and/or':95 'appar':73 'bad':27,32,41 'bitspirit':78 'blog':66 'bt':125 'case':76 'comment':14 'common':56 'consensus':57 'continu':4 'direct':86 'exclud':36 'get':23 'infer':54 'inform':89,120 'ip':84 'last':7 'leak':121 'lemmy.ml':10,16 'lemmy.ml/comment/5514226)':15 'lemmy.ml/post/7505468),':9 'level':71 'libtorr':80 'main':62 'natur':122 'network':30,44 'never':22 'peer':98 'point':63 'post':8,67 'privaci':35 'privat':48 'problem':72 'protocol':70,126 'recommend':24 'rufus@discuss.tchncs.de':19 'save':118 'send':91 'simpli':81 'specif':12 'statement':112 'tor':53,99 'tracker':94 'traffic':108 'transport':104,116 'true':114 'use':49 'utorr':77 'vpn':50,101 'within':109 'wrap':106 'write':82 'www.techradar.com':59 'www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':58"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699218610
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699145293 {#2459
date: 2023-11-05 01:48:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699143610 {#2361
date: 2023-11-05 01:20:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2372
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1728 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2364 …}
+slug: "If-BT-over-Tor-is-bad-for-privacy-why-VPN"
+title: "If BT over Tor is bad for privacy, why VPN is not?"
+url: null
+body: """
This is an continuation of my [last post](https://lemmy.ml/post/7505468), specifically a [comment](https://lemmy.ml/comment/5514226) from @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de:\n
\n
> It will never get recommended. It’s bad for the network and bad for your privacy.\n
\n
Excluding that doing so is bad for the network, why it is “private” using VPN but not Tor, inferring from [common consensus](https://www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn). The main point in the blog post is a protocol level problem:\n
\n
> apparently in some cases uTorrent, BitSpirit, and libTorrent simply write your IP address directly into the information they send to the tracker and/or to other peers\n
\n
Tor and VPN are both transports what wrap other traffic within. If that statement is true, no transport can save the information leaking nature of the BT protocol itself.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 9
+favouriteCount: 14
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699231100 {#2469
date: 2023-11-06 01:38:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rufus@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2377 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+children: []
-id: 9996
-titleTs: "'bad':6 'bt':2 'privaci':8 'tor':4 'vpn':10"
-bodyTs: "'/comment/5514226)':17 '/post/7505468),':11 '/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':60 'address':85 'and/or':95 'appar':73 'bad':27,32,41 'bitspirit':78 'blog':66 'bt':125 'case':76 'comment':14 'common':56 'consensus':57 'continu':4 'direct':86 'exclud':36 'get':23 'infer':54 'inform':89,120 'ip':84 'last':7 'leak':121 'lemmy.ml':10,16 'lemmy.ml/comment/5514226)':15 'lemmy.ml/post/7505468),':9 'level':71 'libtorr':80 'main':62 'natur':122 'network':30,44 'never':22 'peer':98 'point':63 'post':8,67 'privaci':35 'privat':48 'problem':72 'protocol':70,126 'recommend':24 'rufus@discuss.tchncs.de':19 'save':118 'send':91 'simpli':81 'specif':12 'statement':112 'tor':53,99 'tracker':94 'traffic':108 'transport':104,116 'true':114 'use':49 'utorr':77 'vpn':50,101 'within':109 'wrap':106 'write':82 'www.techradar.com':59 'www.techradar.com/vpn/torrenting-safely-with-vpn).':58"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699218610
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699145293 {#2459
date: 2023-11-05 01:48:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699143610 {#2361
date: 2023-11-05 01:20:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1410
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1874 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1907 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1908 …}
+slug: "Hash-matching-proposals-for-the-Online-Safety-Act-s-implementation-are"
+title: "Hash matching proposals for the Online Safety Act’s implementation are dangerous | Proton"
+url: "https://proton.me/blog/online-safety-act-hash-scanning"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699721189 {#1708
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2369 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2392 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
+children: []
-id: 12705
-titleTs: "'act':8 'danger':12 'hash':1 'implement':10 'match':2 'onlin':6 'propos':3 'proton':13 'safeti':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699757189
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7823751"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699721189 {#1926
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1410
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1874 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1907 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1908 …}
+slug: "Hash-matching-proposals-for-the-Online-Safety-Act-s-implementation-are"
+title: "Hash matching proposals for the Online Safety Act’s implementation are dangerous | Proton"
+url: "https://proton.me/blog/online-safety-act-hash-scanning"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699721189 {#1708
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2369 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2392 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
+children: []
-id: 12705
-titleTs: "'act':8 'danger':12 'hash':1 'implement':10 'match':2 'onlin':6 'propos':3 'proton':13 'safeti':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699757189
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7823751"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699721189 {#1926
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1410
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1874 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1907 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1908 …}
+slug: "Hash-matching-proposals-for-the-Online-Safety-Act-s-implementation-are"
+title: "Hash matching proposals for the Online Safety Act’s implementation are dangerous | Proton"
+url: "https://proton.me/blog/online-safety-act-hash-scanning"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699721189 {#1708
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2391 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2369 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2392 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2395 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1384 …}
+children: []
-id: 12705
-titleTs: "'act':8 'danger':12 'hash':1 'implement':10 'match':2 'onlin':6 'propos':3 'proton':13 'safeti':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699757189
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/7823751"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699721189 {#1926
date: 2023-11-11 17:46:29.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|