GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/tag/surveillance/commented

Response
200 OK
IP
18.191.171.26
Profiled on
Token
9a17cd

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 0.24 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.04 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Post {#1346
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1826 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1771 …}
  +image: null
  +slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
  +body: """
    House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
    \n
    Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
    \n
    So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
    \n
    <https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
    \n
    The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
    \n
    #fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#1509
    date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: [
    "fisa"
    "surveillance"
  ]
  +mentions: [
    "@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
    "@privacy@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1819 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2399 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1921 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1867 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1928 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 316
  -bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701963627
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2423
    date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 316
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\Post {#1346
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1826 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1771 …}
  +image: null
  +slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
  +body: """
    House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
    \n
    Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
    \n
    So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
    \n
    <https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
    \n
    The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
    \n
    #fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#1509
    date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: [
    "fisa"
    "surveillance"
  ]
  +mentions: [
    "@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
    "@privacy@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1819 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2399 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1921 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1867 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1928 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 316
  -bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701963627
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2423
    date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 316
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\Post {#1346
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1826 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1771 …}
  +image: null
  +slug: "House-Judiciary-Committee-advances-FISA-Section-702-bill-with-warrant"
  +body: """
    House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2\n
    \n
    Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."\n
    \n
    So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley@infosec.exchange's paywalled Bloomberg News article\n
    \n
    <https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance>\n
    \n
    The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)\n
    \n
    #fisa #surveillance @privacy@lemmy.ml
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +commentCount: 4
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1702101329 {#1509
    date: 2023-12-09 06:55:29.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: [
    "fisa"
    "surveillance"
  ]
  +mentions: [
    "@tonya_riley@infosec.exchange"
    "@privacy@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1819 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2399 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1921 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1867 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1928 …}
  +children: []
  -id: 316
  -bodyTs: "'-2':13 '/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':47 '1/3':102 '35':12 '6570':52 '702':7 'act':60,81 'advanc':4 'andi':64 'anyon':23 'articl':44 'az':68 'bigg':65 'bill':8,49,96 'bipartisan':77 'bloomberg':42 'care':25 'committe':3 'coverag':37 'end':57 'far':34 'fisa':5,103 'forward':99 'govern':31,78 'great':20 'h.r':51 'hous':1 'judiciari':2 'lee':87 'liberti':55 'lot':72 'mike':86 'move':98 'news':21,43 'news.bloomberglaw.com':46 'news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance':45 'overreach':32 'paywal':41 'potenti':97 'privaci':29 'privacy@lemmy.ml':105 'protect':27,54 'r':67 'r-az':66 'reform':80 'rep':63 'requir':11 'ron':15 'say':17 'section':6 'sen':14,85 'senat':90 'similar':74 'sponsor':61,91 'surveil':59,79,104 'tonya_riley@infosec.exchange':39 'warrant':10 'warrantless':58 'well':101 'wyden':16,83"
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1701963627
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.exchange/users/thenexusofprivacy/statuses/111535562945428640"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701897627 {#2423
    date: 2023-12-06 22:20:27.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 316
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details