1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2084
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2094 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2090 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2091 …}
+slug: "Nitter-is-shutting-down"
+title: "Nitter is shutting down"
+url: "https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376"
+body: """
cross-posted from: [lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)\n
\n
> [nitter.d420.de](https://nitter.d420.de)\n
> \n
> Goodbye twitter I guess. There’s no longer any way to see twitter things people send you without an account
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 345
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729425757 {#2026
date: 2024-10-20 14:02:37.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2087 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2088 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2064 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2063 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2077 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2062 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2391}
]
-id: 33553
-titleTs: "'nitter':1 'shut':3"
-bodyTs: "'/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':7 'account':29 'cross':2 'cross-post':1 'goodby':10 'guess':13 'lemmy.ml':6 'lemmy.ml/post/11136426](https://lemmy.ml/post/11136426)':5 'longer':17 'nitter.d420.de':8,9 'peopl':24 'post':3 'see':21 'send':25 'thing':23 'twitter':11,22 'way':19 'without':27"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706494872
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/11136432"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706408472 {#2241
date: 2024-01-28 03:21:12.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
Came here to post a similar comment zedeus made in [another thread](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):\n
\n
> Nitter is dead.\n
\n
I still checked some Twitter accounts from people that were interesting to me and didn’t migrate to Mastodon. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 6
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1706434057 {#1908
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
"@morrowind@lemmy.ml"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2079 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2036 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2035 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2013 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2012 …}
-id: 346746
-bodyTs: "'/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':15 'account':24 'anoth':11 'came':1 'check':21 'comment':7 'dead':18 'didn':33 'github.com':14 'github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-1913361757):':13 'guess':45 'interest':29 'less':39 'made':9 'mastodon':37 'migrat':35 'nitter':16 'one':38 'peopl':26 'post':4 'similar':6 'still':20 'thing':40 'thread':12 'twitter':23 'worri':42 'zedeus':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/6088847"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1729120515 {#1407
date: 2024-10-17 01:15:15.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706434057 {#1883
date: 2024-01-28 10:27:37.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 346746
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
} |
|
Show voter details
|
17 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
18 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
} |
|
Show voter details
|
19 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
} |
|
Show voter details
|
20 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1604 …}
+slug: "Accept-cookie-banners-with-third-party-cookies-rejected"
+title: "Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi,\n
\n
In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we’ve recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn’t work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don’t doubt it’ll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.\n
\n
Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we’re presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.\n
\n
With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I’m missing here?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 42
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724717095 {#1563
date: 2024-08-27 02:04:55.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1613 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1621 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …}
+children: [
1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1721
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1620}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2459 …}
+body: "Yes, I’m aware those filters exist, but I’m asking about the practical implications of the set up I mentioned in the post."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705252460 {#1616
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@tordenflesk@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2460 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
-id: 308425
-bodyTs: "'ask':11 'awar':4 'exist':7 'filter':6 'implic':15 'm':3,10 'mention':21 'post':24 'practic':14 'set':18 'yes':1"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5692414"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705252460 {#1629
date: 2024-01-14 18:14:20.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 308425
}
0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2382}
]
-id: 30362
-titleTs: "'accept':1 'banner':3 'cooki':2,8 'parti':7 'reject':9 'third':6 'third-parti':5"
-bodyTs: "'accept':44,140,160,192 'ad':181 'anyth':200 'anyway':176 'banner':18 'blocker':182 'broken':38 'brows':185 'browser':96,136 'buy':54 'case':52 'combin':178 'comput':175 'consent':60,89 'consent-o-mat':59 'cooki':17,27,88,102,106,133,161,164,167,196 'correct':77 'delet':101 'delug':15 'differ':158 'doesn':47 'doubt':73 'etc':107 'europ':9 'exact':187 'exampl':64 'experi':186 'fee':30 'form':34,142,197 'gdpr':33 'get':41,76,171 'go':169 'hard':68 'hi':1 'instal':172 'layer':94,97,112,137,147 'least':92 'll':75 'load':122 'm':202 'make':183 'matic':62 'mean':126 'mention':152 'might':100 'miss':203 'o':61 'offer':20 'option':23,43,119 'page':124 'parti':105,132 'place':7 'present':116 'probabl':5 're':115 'realli':156 'recent':12 'regular':32 'reject':25,45,58,103,129,163,194 'seen':13 'set':150 'sever':42 'site':110,145 'slight':37 'someth':86 'spain':3 'subscript':56 'talk':84 'tangenti':87 'therefor':36 'third':104,131 'third-parti':130 'time':69,79 'track':26,166 'two':93 'ui':111,146 've':11 'want':82 'whatev':141 'whether':190 'work':49"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705314398
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/7153281"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705227998 {#1548
date: 2024-01-14 11:26:38.0 +01:00
}
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2372 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2380 …}
+body: "Where’s that? I just ran a test search but I can’t see it :-?"
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1705306363 {#1729
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
"@rinze@infosec.pub"
"@Shamot@jlai.lu"
"@Agility0971@lemmy.world"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1910 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1909 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1926 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1874 …}
-id: 310192
-bodyTs: "'ran':6 'search':9 'see':14 'test':8"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/5705957"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1723855910 {#2385
date: 2024-08-17 02:51:50.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705306363 {#2384
date: 2024-01-15 09:12:43.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310192
} |
|
Show voter details
|
21 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
22 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1703
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1650 …}
+slug: "Europe-s-hidden-security-crisis-PDF"
+title: "Europe’s hidden security crisis [PDF]"
+url: "https://www.iccl.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Europes-hidden-security-crisis.pdf"
+body: """
Real-Time Bidding (RTB) allows foreign states and non-state actors to obtain compromising sensitive personal data about key European personnel and leaders.\n
\n
Key insights:\n
\n
- Our investigation highlights a widespread trade in data about sensitive European personnel and leaders that exposes them to blackmail, hacking and compromise, and undermines the security of their organisations and institutions.\n
- These data flow from Real-Time Bidding (RTB), an advertising technology that is active on almost all websites and apps. RTB involves the broadcasting of sensitive data about people using those websites and apps to large numbers of other entities, without security measures to protect the data. This occurs billions of times a day.\n
- Our examination of tens of thousands of pages of RTB data reveals that EU military personnel and political decision makers are targeted using RTB.\n
- This report also reveals that Google and other RTB firms send RTB data about people in the U.S. to Russia and China, where national laws enable security agencies to access the data. RTB data are also broadcast widely within the EU in a free-for-all, which means that foreign and non-state actors can indirectly obtain them, too.\n
- RTB data often include location data or time-stamps or other identifiers that make it relatively easy for bad actors to link them to specific individuals. Foreign states and non-state actors can use RTB to spy on target individuals’ financial problems, mental state, and compromising intimate secrets. Even if target individuals use secure devices, data about them will still flow via RTB from personal devices, their friends, family, and compromising personal contacts.\n
- In addition, private surveillance companies in foreign countries deploy RTB data for surreptitious surveillance. We reveal “Patternz”, a previously unreported surveillance tool that uses RTB to profile 5 billion people, including the children of their targets.\n
- Our examination of RTB data reveals Cambridge Analytica style psychological profiling of target individuals’ movements, financial problems, mental health problems and vulnerabilities, including if they are likely survivors of sexual abuse.\n
- Real-Time Bidding’s security flaw is a national security problem
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700234225 {#1449
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1655 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
+children: []
-id: 13879
-titleTs: "'crisi':5 'europ':1 'hidden':3 'pdf':6 'secur':4"
-bodyTs: "'5':301 'abus':340 'access':167 'activ':73 'actor':13,193,219,232 'addit':275 'advertis':69 'agenc':165 'allow':6 'almost':75 'also':140,173 'analytica':317 'app':79,93 'bad':218 'bid':4,66,344 'billion':109,302 'blackmail':46 'broadcast':83,174 'cambridg':316 'children':306 'china':159 'compani':278 'compromis':16,49,246,271 'contact':273 'countri':281 'data':19,35,60,86,106,124,150,169,171,200,204,256,284,314 'day':113 'decis':132 'deploy':282 'devic':255,266 'easi':216 'enabl':163 'entiti':99 'eu':127,178 'european':22,38 'even':249 'examin':115,311 'expos':43 'famili':269 'financi':241,325 'firm':147 'flaw':347 'flow':61,261 'foreign':7,188,226,280 'free':182 'free-for-al':181 'friend':268 'googl':143 'hack':47 'health':328 'highlight':30 'identifi':211 'includ':202,304,332 'indirect':195 'individu':225,240,252,323 'insight':27 'institut':58 'intim':247 'investig':29 'involv':81 'key':21,26 'larg':95 'law':162 'leader':25,41 'like':336 'link':221 'locat':203 'make':213 'maker':133 'mean':186 'measur':102 'mental':243,327 'militari':128 'movement':324 'nation':161,350 'non':11,191,230 'non-stat':10,190,229 'number':96 'obtain':15,196 'occur':108 'often':201 'organis':56 'page':121 'patternz':290 'peopl':88,152,303 'person':18,265,272 'personnel':23,39,129 'polit':131 'previous':292 'privat':276 'problem':242,326,329,352 'profil':300,320 'protect':104 'psycholog':319 'real':2,64,342 'real-tim':1,63,341 'relat':215 'report':139 'reveal':125,141,289,315 'rtb':5,67,80,123,137,146,149,170,199,235,263,283,298,313 'russia':157 'secret':248 'secur':53,101,164,254,346,351 'send':148 'sensit':17,37,85 'sexual':339 'specif':224 'spi':237 'stamp':208 'state':8,12,192,227,231,244 'still':260 'style':318 'surreptiti':286 'surveil':277,287,294 'survivor':337 'target':135,239,251,309,322 'technolog':70 'ten':117 'thousand':119 'time':3,65,111,207,343 'time-stamp':206 'tool':295 'trade':33 'u.s':155 'undermin':51 'unreport':293 'use':89,136,234,253,297 'via':262 'vulner':331 'websit':77,91 'wide':175 'widespread':32 'within':176 'without':100"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700283725
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/5008906"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700514150 {#1447
date: 2023-11-20 22:02:30.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700234225 {#1442
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
23 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1703
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1650 …}
+slug: "Europe-s-hidden-security-crisis-PDF"
+title: "Europe’s hidden security crisis [PDF]"
+url: "https://www.iccl.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Europes-hidden-security-crisis.pdf"
+body: """
Real-Time Bidding (RTB) allows foreign states and non-state actors to obtain compromising sensitive personal data about key European personnel and leaders.\n
\n
Key insights:\n
\n
- Our investigation highlights a widespread trade in data about sensitive European personnel and leaders that exposes them to blackmail, hacking and compromise, and undermines the security of their organisations and institutions.\n
- These data flow from Real-Time Bidding (RTB), an advertising technology that is active on almost all websites and apps. RTB involves the broadcasting of sensitive data about people using those websites and apps to large numbers of other entities, without security measures to protect the data. This occurs billions of times a day.\n
- Our examination of tens of thousands of pages of RTB data reveals that EU military personnel and political decision makers are targeted using RTB.\n
- This report also reveals that Google and other RTB firms send RTB data about people in the U.S. to Russia and China, where national laws enable security agencies to access the data. RTB data are also broadcast widely within the EU in a free-for-all, which means that foreign and non-state actors can indirectly obtain them, too.\n
- RTB data often include location data or time-stamps or other identifiers that make it relatively easy for bad actors to link them to specific individuals. Foreign states and non-state actors can use RTB to spy on target individuals’ financial problems, mental state, and compromising intimate secrets. Even if target individuals use secure devices, data about them will still flow via RTB from personal devices, their friends, family, and compromising personal contacts.\n
- In addition, private surveillance companies in foreign countries deploy RTB data for surreptitious surveillance. We reveal “Patternz”, a previously unreported surveillance tool that uses RTB to profile 5 billion people, including the children of their targets.\n
- Our examination of RTB data reveals Cambridge Analytica style psychological profiling of target individuals’ movements, financial problems, mental health problems and vulnerabilities, including if they are likely survivors of sexual abuse.\n
- Real-Time Bidding’s security flaw is a national security problem
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700234225 {#1449
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1655 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
+children: []
-id: 13879
-titleTs: "'crisi':5 'europ':1 'hidden':3 'pdf':6 'secur':4"
-bodyTs: "'5':301 'abus':340 'access':167 'activ':73 'actor':13,193,219,232 'addit':275 'advertis':69 'agenc':165 'allow':6 'almost':75 'also':140,173 'analytica':317 'app':79,93 'bad':218 'bid':4,66,344 'billion':109,302 'blackmail':46 'broadcast':83,174 'cambridg':316 'children':306 'china':159 'compani':278 'compromis':16,49,246,271 'contact':273 'countri':281 'data':19,35,60,86,106,124,150,169,171,200,204,256,284,314 'day':113 'decis':132 'deploy':282 'devic':255,266 'easi':216 'enabl':163 'entiti':99 'eu':127,178 'european':22,38 'even':249 'examin':115,311 'expos':43 'famili':269 'financi':241,325 'firm':147 'flaw':347 'flow':61,261 'foreign':7,188,226,280 'free':182 'free-for-al':181 'friend':268 'googl':143 'hack':47 'health':328 'highlight':30 'identifi':211 'includ':202,304,332 'indirect':195 'individu':225,240,252,323 'insight':27 'institut':58 'intim':247 'investig':29 'involv':81 'key':21,26 'larg':95 'law':162 'leader':25,41 'like':336 'link':221 'locat':203 'make':213 'maker':133 'mean':186 'measur':102 'mental':243,327 'militari':128 'movement':324 'nation':161,350 'non':11,191,230 'non-stat':10,190,229 'number':96 'obtain':15,196 'occur':108 'often':201 'organis':56 'page':121 'patternz':290 'peopl':88,152,303 'person':18,265,272 'personnel':23,39,129 'polit':131 'previous':292 'privat':276 'problem':242,326,329,352 'profil':300,320 'protect':104 'psycholog':319 'real':2,64,342 'real-tim':1,63,341 'relat':215 'report':139 'reveal':125,141,289,315 'rtb':5,67,80,123,137,146,149,170,199,235,263,283,298,313 'russia':157 'secret':248 'secur':53,101,164,254,346,351 'send':148 'sensit':17,37,85 'sexual':339 'specif':224 'spi':237 'stamp':208 'state':8,12,192,227,231,244 'still':260 'style':318 'surreptiti':286 'surveil':277,287,294 'survivor':337 'target':135,239,251,309,322 'technolog':70 'ten':117 'thousand':119 'time':3,65,111,207,343 'time-stamp':206 'tool':295 'trade':33 'u.s':155 'undermin':51 'unreport':293 'use':89,136,234,253,297 'via':262 'vulner':331 'websit':77,91 'wide':175 'widespread':32 'within':176 'without':100"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700283725
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/5008906"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700514150 {#1447
date: 2023-11-20 22:02:30.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700234225 {#1442
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
24 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1703
+user: App\Entity\User {#259 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1584 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1650 …}
+slug: "Europe-s-hidden-security-crisis-PDF"
+title: "Europe’s hidden security crisis [PDF]"
+url: "https://www.iccl.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Europes-hidden-security-crisis.pdf"
+body: """
Real-Time Bidding (RTB) allows foreign states and non-state actors to obtain compromising sensitive personal data about key European personnel and leaders.\n
\n
Key insights:\n
\n
- Our investigation highlights a widespread trade in data about sensitive European personnel and leaders that exposes them to blackmail, hacking and compromise, and undermines the security of their organisations and institutions.\n
- These data flow from Real-Time Bidding (RTB), an advertising technology that is active on almost all websites and apps. RTB involves the broadcasting of sensitive data about people using those websites and apps to large numbers of other entities, without security measures to protect the data. This occurs billions of times a day.\n
- Our examination of tens of thousands of pages of RTB data reveals that EU military personnel and political decision makers are targeted using RTB.\n
- This report also reveals that Google and other RTB firms send RTB data about people in the U.S. to Russia and China, where national laws enable security agencies to access the data. RTB data are also broadcast widely within the EU in a free-for-all, which means that foreign and non-state actors can indirectly obtain them, too.\n
- RTB data often include location data or time-stamps or other identifiers that make it relatively easy for bad actors to link them to specific individuals. Foreign states and non-state actors can use RTB to spy on target individuals’ financial problems, mental state, and compromising intimate secrets. Even if target individuals use secure devices, data about them will still flow via RTB from personal devices, their friends, family, and compromising personal contacts.\n
- In addition, private surveillance companies in foreign countries deploy RTB data for surreptitious surveillance. We reveal “Patternz”, a previously unreported surveillance tool that uses RTB to profile 5 billion people, including the children of their targets.\n
- Our examination of RTB data reveals Cambridge Analytica style psychological profiling of target individuals’ movements, financial problems, mental health problems and vulnerabilities, including if they are likely survivors of sexual abuse.\n
- Real-Time Bidding’s security flaw is a national security problem
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700234225 {#1449
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1655 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
+children: []
-id: 13879
-titleTs: "'crisi':5 'europ':1 'hidden':3 'pdf':6 'secur':4"
-bodyTs: "'5':301 'abus':340 'access':167 'activ':73 'actor':13,193,219,232 'addit':275 'advertis':69 'agenc':165 'allow':6 'almost':75 'also':140,173 'analytica':317 'app':79,93 'bad':218 'bid':4,66,344 'billion':109,302 'blackmail':46 'broadcast':83,174 'cambridg':316 'children':306 'china':159 'compani':278 'compromis':16,49,246,271 'contact':273 'countri':281 'data':19,35,60,86,106,124,150,169,171,200,204,256,284,314 'day':113 'decis':132 'deploy':282 'devic':255,266 'easi':216 'enabl':163 'entiti':99 'eu':127,178 'european':22,38 'even':249 'examin':115,311 'expos':43 'famili':269 'financi':241,325 'firm':147 'flaw':347 'flow':61,261 'foreign':7,188,226,280 'free':182 'free-for-al':181 'friend':268 'googl':143 'hack':47 'health':328 'highlight':30 'identifi':211 'includ':202,304,332 'indirect':195 'individu':225,240,252,323 'insight':27 'institut':58 'intim':247 'investig':29 'involv':81 'key':21,26 'larg':95 'law':162 'leader':25,41 'like':336 'link':221 'locat':203 'make':213 'maker':133 'mean':186 'measur':102 'mental':243,327 'militari':128 'movement':324 'nation':161,350 'non':11,191,230 'non-stat':10,190,229 'number':96 'obtain':15,196 'occur':108 'often':201 'organis':56 'page':121 'patternz':290 'peopl':88,152,303 'person':18,265,272 'personnel':23,39,129 'polit':131 'previous':292 'privat':276 'problem':242,326,329,352 'profil':300,320 'protect':104 'psycholog':319 'real':2,64,342 'real-tim':1,63,341 'relat':215 'report':139 'reveal':125,141,289,315 'rtb':5,67,80,123,137,146,149,170,199,235,263,283,298,313 'russia':157 'secret':248 'secur':53,101,164,254,346,351 'send':148 'sensit':17,37,85 'sexual':339 'specif':224 'spi':237 'stamp':208 'state':8,12,192,227,231,244 'still':260 'style':318 'surreptiti':286 'surveil':277,287,294 'survivor':337 'target':135,239,251,309,322 'technolog':70 'ten':117 'thousand':119 'time':3,65,111,207,343 'time-stamp':206 'tool':295 'trade':33 'u.s':155 'undermin':51 'unreport':293 'use':89,136,234,253,297 'via':262 'vulner':331 'websit':77,91 'wide':175 'widespread':32 'within':176 'without':100"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700283725
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://infosec.pub/post/5008906"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700514150 {#1447
date: 2023-11-20 22:02:30.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700234225 {#1442
date: 2023-11-17 16:17:05.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
25 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
26 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|