Symfony Profiler

{
    "@context": [
        "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
    ],
    "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
    "to": [
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
    ],
    "object": {
        "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/activities\/update\/aee8f377-acca-4146-a873-a7a2e2fc5720",
        "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/u\/theunknownmuncher",
        "to": [
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
        ],
        "object": {
            "type": "Note",
            "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/comment\/16497167",
            "attributedTo": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/u\/theunknownmuncher",
            "to": [
                "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
            ],
            "cc": [
                "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
                "https:\/\/fedia.io\/u\/moonlight"
            ],
            "content": "<p>You\u2019re describing a typical budget CRT, and like typical budget flat screen panels today, they did suck. BUT\u2026<\/p>\n<p>CRT is a superior display technology and high end tubes have only recently been maybe matched in quality by specifically OLED. Manufacturers did not switch to flat panels because of superior quality, they did it because they are much cheaper to manufacture, handle, transport, and are more appealing to consumers due to energy use, weight, size\/aspect ratio, and less configuration.<\/p>\n<p>I have a Trinitron tube, which runs at 1600x1200@85Hz native (nearly the same number of pixels as full HD) and can be run at significantly higher resolutions.<\/p>\n<p>You mention flicker, which is a problem for typical budget low Hz CRTs, but is not a problem for better, high Hz tubes.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>wider color gamut, more accurate colors, higher contrast ratio<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Plainly incorrect. OLED is the first flat panel technology to <em>basically<\/em> match a CRT in image quality. CRT shows true black and near perfect color, they also can display any resolution without interpolation because they do not have pixels, and can partially activate posphors for a more accurate image than the equivalent discrete pixel resolution. My Trinitron tube\u2019s detail accuracy is only limited by the spacing of the aperature grille. So comparing resolution is kind of apples to oranges. And this is why old low res games did actually look better on a CRT than they do now when played on modern flat screens.<\/p>\n<p>There are real benefits to OLED (weight, size, wide aspect ratios, energy use, gimmick refresh rates), but picture quality is not one of them.<\/p>\n",
            "inReplyTo": "https:\/\/fedia.io\/m\/asklemmy@lemmy.world\/t\/2062852\/-\/comment\/10305356",
            "mediaType": "text\/html",
            "source": {
                "content": "You're describing a typical budget CRT, and like typical budget flat screen panels today, they did suck. BUT...\n\nCRT is a superior display technology and high end tubes have only recently been maybe matched in quality by specifically OLED. Manufacturers did not switch to flat panels because of superior quality, they did it because they are much cheaper to manufacture, handle, transport, and are more appealing to consumers due to energy use, weight, size\/aspect ratio, and less configuration.\n\nI have a Trinitron tube, which runs at 1600x1200@85Hz native (nearly the same number of pixels as full HD) and can be run at significantly higher resolutions.\n\nYou mention flicker, which is a problem for typical budget low Hz CRTs, but is not a problem for better, high Hz tubes.\n\n> wider color gamut, more accurate colors, higher contrast ratio\n\nPlainly incorrect. OLED is the first flat panel technology to _basically_ match a CRT in image quality. CRT shows true black and near perfect color, they also can display any resolution without interpolation because they do not have pixels, and can partially activate posphors for a more accurate image than the equivalent discrete pixel resolution. My Trinitron tube's detail accuracy is only limited by the spacing of the aperature grille. So comparing resolution is kind of apples to oranges. And this is why old low res games did actually look better on a CRT than they do now when played on modern flat screens.\n\nThere are real benefits to OLED (weight, size, wide aspect ratios, energy use, gimmick refresh rates), but picture quality is not one of them.",
                "mediaType": "text\/markdown"
            },
            "published": "2025-04-17T02:13:52.510120Z",
            "updated": "2025-04-17T02:33:13.336535Z",
            "tag": [
                {
                    "href": "https:\/\/fedia.io\/u\/moonlight",
                    "name": "@moonlight@fedia.io",
                    "type": "Mention"
                }
            ],
            "distinguished": false,
            "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
            "attachment": []
        },
        "cc": [
            "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
            "https:\/\/fedia.io\/u\/moonlight"
        ],
        "tag": [
            {
                "href": "https:\/\/fedia.io\/u\/moonlight",
                "name": "@moonlight@fedia.io",
                "type": "Mention"
            }
        ],
        "type": "Update",
        "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy"
    },
    "cc": [
        "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy\/followers"
    ],
    "type": "Announce",
    "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/activities\/announce\/update\/8b9f1642-f1ec-48d9-9f07-9b602da7be71"
}

{"@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"actor":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"id":"https://lemmy.world/activities/update/aee8f377-acca-4146-a873-a7a2e2fc5720","actor":"https://lemmy.world/u/theunknownmuncher","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"type":"Note","id":"https://lemmy.world/comment/16497167","attributedTo":"https://lemmy.world/u/theunknownmuncher","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","https://fedia.io/u/moonlight"],"content":"<p>You’re describing a typical budget CRT, and like typical budget flat screen panels today, they did suck. BUT…</p>\n<p>CRT is a superior display technology and high end tubes have only recently been maybe matched in quality by specifically OLED. Manufacturers did not switch to flat panels because of superior quality, they did it because they are much cheaper to manufacture, handle, transport, and are more appealing to consumers due to energy use, weight, size/aspect ratio, and less configuration.</p>\n<p>I have a Trinitron tube, which runs at 1600x1200@85Hz native (nearly the same number of pixels as full HD) and can be run at significantly higher resolutions.</p>\n<p>You mention flicker, which is a problem for typical budget low Hz CRTs, but is not a problem for better, high Hz tubes.</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>wider color gamut, more accurate colors, higher contrast ratio</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Plainly incorrect. OLED is the first flat panel technology to <em>basically</em> match a CRT in image quality. CRT shows true black and near perfect color, they also can display any resolution without interpolation because they do not have pixels, and can partially activate posphors for a more accurate image than the equivalent discrete pixel resolution. My Trinitron tube’s detail accuracy is only limited by the spacing of the aperature grille. So comparing resolution is kind of apples to oranges. And this is why old low res games did actually look better on a CRT than they do now when played on modern flat screens.</p>\n<p>There are real benefits to OLED (weight, size, wide aspect ratios, energy use, gimmick refresh rates), but picture quality is not one of them.</p>\n","inReplyTo":"https://fedia.io/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/2062852/-/comment/10305356","mediaType":"text/html","source":{"content":"You're describing a typical budget CRT, and like typical budget flat screen panels today, they did suck. BUT...\n\nCRT is a superior display technology and high end tubes have only recently been maybe matched in quality by specifically OLED. Manufacturers did not switch to flat panels because of superior quality, they did it because they are much cheaper to manufacture, handle, transport, and are more appealing to consumers due to energy use, weight, size/aspect ratio, and less configuration.\n\nI have a Trinitron tube, which runs at 1600x1200@85Hz native (nearly the same number of pixels as full HD) and can be run at significantly higher resolutions.\n\nYou mention flicker, which is a problem for typical budget low Hz CRTs, but is not a problem for better, high Hz tubes.\n\n> wider color gamut, more accurate colors, higher contrast ratio\n\nPlainly incorrect. OLED is the first flat panel technology to _basically_ match a CRT in image quality. CRT shows true black and near perfect color, they also can display any resolution without interpolation because they do not have pixels, and can partially activate posphors for a more accurate image than the equivalent discrete pixel resolution. My Trinitron tube's detail accuracy is only limited by the spacing of the aperature grille. So comparing resolution is kind of apples to oranges. And this is why old low res games did actually look better on a CRT than they do now when played on modern flat screens.\n\nThere are real benefits to OLED (weight, size, wide aspect ratios, energy use, gimmick refresh rates), but picture quality is not one of them.","mediaType":"text/markdown"},"published":"2025-04-17T02:13:52.510120Z","updated":"2025-04-17T02:33:13.336535Z","tag":[{"href":"https://fedia.io/u/moonlight","name":"@moonlight@fedia.io","type":"Mention"}],"distinguished":false,"audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","attachment":[]},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","https://fedia.io/u/moonlight"],"tag":[{"href":"https://fedia.io/u/moonlight","name":"@moonlight@fedia.io","type":"Mention"}],"type":"Update","audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy"},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy/followers"],"type":"Announce","id":"https://lemmy.world/activities/announce/update/8b9f1642-f1ec-48d9-9f07-9b602da7be71"}