1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Sanity-check-is-rsyncing-to-a-remote-computer-that-has"
+title: "Sanity check - is rsyncing to a remote computer that has zfs snapshotting an okay way to back things up?"
+url: null
+body: """
I currently have two computers, one that has a big zfs raidz pool that I currently back everything up to. Right now, on my local computer I use `rsnapshot` to do snapshot backups via rsync to the remote zfs pool. I know I’m wasting a ton of space because I have snapshotting in the rsync backup, and then the zfs pool is snapshotted every day.\n
\n
Does it make sense to just do a regular `rsync` into a backup directory on the zfs pool and then just rely on the zfs pool snapshotting for snapshotting?\n
\n
Maybe eventually I will put the local machine on zfs and then just send the local zfs snapshots over, but that will take some time. Thanks!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 15
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729574243 {#1574
date: 2024-10-22 07:17:23.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 33917
-titleTs: "'back':17 'check':2 'comput':8 'okay':14 'remot':7 'rsync':4 'saniti':1 'snapshot':12 'thing':18 'way':15 'zfs':11"
-bodyTs: "'back':17 'backup':33,57,79 'big':10 'comput':5,26 'current':2,16 'day':66 'directori':80 'eventu':97 'everi':65 'everyth':18 'know':42 'local':25,102,111 'm':44 'machin':103 'make':69 'mayb':96 'one':6 'pool':13,40,62,84,92 'put':100 'raidz':12 'regular':75 'reli':88 'remot':38 'right':21 'rsnapshot':29 'rsync':35,56,76 'send':109 'sens':70 'snapshot':32,53,64,93,95,113 'space':49 'take':118 'thank':121 'time':120 'ton':47 'two':4 'use':28 'via':34 'wast':45 'zfs':11,39,61,83,91,105,112"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706647988
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemm.ee/post/22291742"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706564988 {#1409
date: 2024-01-29 22:49:48.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Sanity-check-is-rsyncing-to-a-remote-computer-that-has"
+title: "Sanity check - is rsyncing to a remote computer that has zfs snapshotting an okay way to back things up?"
+url: null
+body: """
I currently have two computers, one that has a big zfs raidz pool that I currently back everything up to. Right now, on my local computer I use `rsnapshot` to do snapshot backups via rsync to the remote zfs pool. I know I’m wasting a ton of space because I have snapshotting in the rsync backup, and then the zfs pool is snapshotted every day.\n
\n
Does it make sense to just do a regular `rsync` into a backup directory on the zfs pool and then just rely on the zfs pool snapshotting for snapshotting?\n
\n
Maybe eventually I will put the local machine on zfs and then just send the local zfs snapshots over, but that will take some time. Thanks!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 15
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729574243 {#1574
date: 2024-10-22 07:17:23.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 33917
-titleTs: "'back':17 'check':2 'comput':8 'okay':14 'remot':7 'rsync':4 'saniti':1 'snapshot':12 'thing':18 'way':15 'zfs':11"
-bodyTs: "'back':17 'backup':33,57,79 'big':10 'comput':5,26 'current':2,16 'day':66 'directori':80 'eventu':97 'everi':65 'everyth':18 'know':42 'local':25,102,111 'm':44 'machin':103 'make':69 'mayb':96 'one':6 'pool':13,40,62,84,92 'put':100 'raidz':12 'regular':75 'reli':88 'remot':38 'right':21 'rsnapshot':29 'rsync':35,56,76 'send':109 'sens':70 'snapshot':32,53,64,93,95,113 'space':49 'take':118 'thank':121 'time':120 'ton':47 'two':4 'use':28 'via':34 'wast':45 'zfs':11,39,61,83,91,105,112"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706647988
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemm.ee/post/22291742"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706564988 {#1409
date: 2024-01-29 22:49:48.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Sanity-check-is-rsyncing-to-a-remote-computer-that-has"
+title: "Sanity check - is rsyncing to a remote computer that has zfs snapshotting an okay way to back things up?"
+url: null
+body: """
I currently have two computers, one that has a big zfs raidz pool that I currently back everything up to. Right now, on my local computer I use `rsnapshot` to do snapshot backups via rsync to the remote zfs pool. I know I’m wasting a ton of space because I have snapshotting in the rsync backup, and then the zfs pool is snapshotted every day.\n
\n
Does it make sense to just do a regular `rsync` into a backup directory on the zfs pool and then just rely on the zfs pool snapshotting for snapshotting?\n
\n
Maybe eventually I will put the local machine on zfs and then just send the local zfs snapshots over, but that will take some time. Thanks!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 15
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1729574243 {#1574
date: 2024-10-22 07:17:23.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 33917
-titleTs: "'back':17 'check':2 'comput':8 'okay':14 'remot':7 'rsync':4 'saniti':1 'snapshot':12 'thing':18 'way':15 'zfs':11"
-bodyTs: "'back':17 'backup':33,57,79 'big':10 'comput':5,26 'current':2,16 'day':66 'directori':80 'eventu':97 'everi':65 'everyth':18 'know':42 'local':25,102,111 'm':44 'machin':103 'make':69 'mayb':96 'one':6 'pool':13,40,62,84,92 'put':100 'raidz':12 'regular':75 'reli':88 'remot':38 'right':21 'rsnapshot':29 'rsync':35,56,76 'send':109 'sens':70 'snapshot':32,53,64,93,95,113 'space':49 'take':118 'thank':121 'time':120 'ton':47 'two':4 'use':28 'via':34 'wast':45 'zfs':11,39,61,83,91,105,112"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1706647988
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemm.ee/post/22291742"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706564988 {#1409
date: 2024-01-29 22:49:48.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|