1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2251
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Is-it-actually-dangerous-to-run-Firefox-as-root"
+title: "Is it actually dangerous to run Firefox as root?"
+url: null
+body: """
I have a few Linux servers at home that I regularly remote into in order to manage, usually logged into KDE Plasma as root. Usually they just have several command line windows and a file manager open (I personally just find it more convenient to use the command line from a remote desktop instead of directly SSH-ing into the system), but if I have an issue, I’ve just been absentmindedly searching stuff up and trying to find solutions using the preinstalled Firefox instance from within the remote desktop itself, which would also be running as root.\n
\n
I never even thought to install uBlock Origin on it or anything, but the servers are all configured to use a PiHole instance which blocks the vast majority of ads. However, I do also remember using the browser in my main server to figure out how to set up the PiHole instance in the first place, and that server also happens to be the most important one and is my main NAS.\n
\n
I never went on any particularly shady websites, but I also don’t remember exactly which websites I’ve been on as root, though I do seem to remember seeing ads during the initial pihole setup, because it didn’t go very smoothly and I was searching up error messages trying to get it to work.\n
\n
This is definitely on me, but it never crossed my mind until recently that it might be a bad idea to use a browser as root, and searching online everyone just states the general cybersecurity doctrine to never do it (which I’m now realizing I shouldn’t have) but no one seems to be discussing how risky it actually is. Shouldn’t Firefox be sandboxing every website and not allowing anything to access the base system? Between “just stop doing it” and “you have to reinstall the OS right now there’s probably already a virus on there,” how much danger do you suppose I’m in? I’m mainly worried about the security/privacy of my personal data I have stored on the servers. All my servers run Fedora KDE Spin and have Intel processors if that makes a difference?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 88
+favouriteCount: 93
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1712572029 {#2247
date: 2024-04-08 12:27:09.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2284 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2286 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2188 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2034 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2156 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2154 …}
+children: []
-id: 26893
-titleTs: "'actual':3 'danger':4 'firefox':7 'root':9 'run':6"
-bodyTs: "'absentmind':73 'access':301 'actual':287 'ad':129,202 'allow':298 'alreadi':322 'also':95,133,159,182 'anyth':111,299 'bad':246 'base':303 'block':124 'browser':137,251 'command':30,48 'configur':117 'conveni':44 'cross':236 'cybersecur':262 'danger':329 'data':346 'definit':230 'desktop':53,91 'didn':210 'differ':368 'direct':56 'discuss':283 'doctrin':263 'error':220 'even':102 'everi':294 'everyon':257 'exact':186 'fedora':357 'figur':143 'file':35 'find':41,80 'firefox':85,291 'first':154 'general':261 'get':224 'go':212 'happen':160 'home':8 'howev':130 'idea':247 'import':165 'ing':59 'initi':205 'instal':105 'instanc':86,122,151 'instead':54 'intel':362 'issu':68 'kde':21,358 'line':31,49 'linux':5 'log':19 'm':270,334,337 'main':140,170,338 'major':127 'make':366 'manag':17,36 'messag':221 'might':243 'mind':238 'much':328 'nas':171 'never':101,173,235,265 'one':166,279 'onlin':256 'open':37 'order':15 'origin':107 'os':316 'particular':177 'person':39,345 'pihol':121,150,206 'place':155 'plasma':22 'preinstal':84 'probabl':321 'processor':363 'realiz':272 'recent':240 'regular':11 'reinstal':314 'rememb':134,185,200 'remot':12,52,90 'right':317 'riski':285 'root':24,99,194,253 'run':97,356 'sandbox':293 'search':74,218,255 'security/privacy':342 'see':201 'seem':198,280 'server':6,114,141,158,352,355 'set':147 'setup':207 'sever':29 'shadi':178 'shouldn':274,289 'smooth':214 'solut':81 'spin':359 'ssh':58 'ssh-ing':57 'state':259 'stop':307 'store':349 'stuff':75 'suppos':332 'system':62,304 'though':195 'thought':103 'tri':78,222 'ublock':106 'use':46,82,119,135,249 'usual':18,25 'vast':126 've':70,190 'virus':324 'websit':179,188,295 'went':174 'window':32 'within':88 'work':227 'worri':339 'would':94"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1704359289
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/10062491"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1711170613 {#2255
date: 2024-03-23 06:10:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704272889 {#2256
date: 2024-01-03 10:08:09.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2251
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Is-it-actually-dangerous-to-run-Firefox-as-root"
+title: "Is it actually dangerous to run Firefox as root?"
+url: null
+body: """
I have a few Linux servers at home that I regularly remote into in order to manage, usually logged into KDE Plasma as root. Usually they just have several command line windows and a file manager open (I personally just find it more convenient to use the command line from a remote desktop instead of directly SSH-ing into the system), but if I have an issue, I’ve just been absentmindedly searching stuff up and trying to find solutions using the preinstalled Firefox instance from within the remote desktop itself, which would also be running as root.\n
\n
I never even thought to install uBlock Origin on it or anything, but the servers are all configured to use a PiHole instance which blocks the vast majority of ads. However, I do also remember using the browser in my main server to figure out how to set up the PiHole instance in the first place, and that server also happens to be the most important one and is my main NAS.\n
\n
I never went on any particularly shady websites, but I also don’t remember exactly which websites I’ve been on as root, though I do seem to remember seeing ads during the initial pihole setup, because it didn’t go very smoothly and I was searching up error messages trying to get it to work.\n
\n
This is definitely on me, but it never crossed my mind until recently that it might be a bad idea to use a browser as root, and searching online everyone just states the general cybersecurity doctrine to never do it (which I’m now realizing I shouldn’t have) but no one seems to be discussing how risky it actually is. Shouldn’t Firefox be sandboxing every website and not allowing anything to access the base system? Between “just stop doing it” and “you have to reinstall the OS right now there’s probably already a virus on there,” how much danger do you suppose I’m in? I’m mainly worried about the security/privacy of my personal data I have stored on the servers. All my servers run Fedora KDE Spin and have Intel processors if that makes a difference?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 88
+favouriteCount: 93
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1712572029 {#2247
date: 2024-04-08 12:27:09.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2284 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2286 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2188 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2034 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2156 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2154 …}
+children: []
-id: 26893
-titleTs: "'actual':3 'danger':4 'firefox':7 'root':9 'run':6"
-bodyTs: "'absentmind':73 'access':301 'actual':287 'ad':129,202 'allow':298 'alreadi':322 'also':95,133,159,182 'anyth':111,299 'bad':246 'base':303 'block':124 'browser':137,251 'command':30,48 'configur':117 'conveni':44 'cross':236 'cybersecur':262 'danger':329 'data':346 'definit':230 'desktop':53,91 'didn':210 'differ':368 'direct':56 'discuss':283 'doctrin':263 'error':220 'even':102 'everi':294 'everyon':257 'exact':186 'fedora':357 'figur':143 'file':35 'find':41,80 'firefox':85,291 'first':154 'general':261 'get':224 'go':212 'happen':160 'home':8 'howev':130 'idea':247 'import':165 'ing':59 'initi':205 'instal':105 'instanc':86,122,151 'instead':54 'intel':362 'issu':68 'kde':21,358 'line':31,49 'linux':5 'log':19 'm':270,334,337 'main':140,170,338 'major':127 'make':366 'manag':17,36 'messag':221 'might':243 'mind':238 'much':328 'nas':171 'never':101,173,235,265 'one':166,279 'onlin':256 'open':37 'order':15 'origin':107 'os':316 'particular':177 'person':39,345 'pihol':121,150,206 'place':155 'plasma':22 'preinstal':84 'probabl':321 'processor':363 'realiz':272 'recent':240 'regular':11 'reinstal':314 'rememb':134,185,200 'remot':12,52,90 'right':317 'riski':285 'root':24,99,194,253 'run':97,356 'sandbox':293 'search':74,218,255 'security/privacy':342 'see':201 'seem':198,280 'server':6,114,141,158,352,355 'set':147 'setup':207 'sever':29 'shadi':178 'shouldn':274,289 'smooth':214 'solut':81 'spin':359 'ssh':58 'ssh-ing':57 'state':259 'stop':307 'store':349 'stuff':75 'suppos':332 'system':62,304 'though':195 'thought':103 'tri':78,222 'ublock':106 'use':46,82,119,135,249 'usual':18,25 'vast':126 've':70,190 'virus':324 'websit':179,188,295 'went':174 'window':32 'within':88 'work':227 'worri':339 'would':94"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1704359289
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/10062491"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1711170613 {#2255
date: 2024-03-23 06:10:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704272889 {#2256
date: 2024-01-03 10:08:09.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2251
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Is-it-actually-dangerous-to-run-Firefox-as-root"
+title: "Is it actually dangerous to run Firefox as root?"
+url: null
+body: """
I have a few Linux servers at home that I regularly remote into in order to manage, usually logged into KDE Plasma as root. Usually they just have several command line windows and a file manager open (I personally just find it more convenient to use the command line from a remote desktop instead of directly SSH-ing into the system), but if I have an issue, I’ve just been absentmindedly searching stuff up and trying to find solutions using the preinstalled Firefox instance from within the remote desktop itself, which would also be running as root.\n
\n
I never even thought to install uBlock Origin on it or anything, but the servers are all configured to use a PiHole instance which blocks the vast majority of ads. However, I do also remember using the browser in my main server to figure out how to set up the PiHole instance in the first place, and that server also happens to be the most important one and is my main NAS.\n
\n
I never went on any particularly shady websites, but I also don’t remember exactly which websites I’ve been on as root, though I do seem to remember seeing ads during the initial pihole setup, because it didn’t go very smoothly and I was searching up error messages trying to get it to work.\n
\n
This is definitely on me, but it never crossed my mind until recently that it might be a bad idea to use a browser as root, and searching online everyone just states the general cybersecurity doctrine to never do it (which I’m now realizing I shouldn’t have) but no one seems to be discussing how risky it actually is. Shouldn’t Firefox be sandboxing every website and not allowing anything to access the base system? Between “just stop doing it” and “you have to reinstall the OS right now there’s probably already a virus on there,” how much danger do you suppose I’m in? I’m mainly worried about the security/privacy of my personal data I have stored on the servers. All my servers run Fedora KDE Spin and have Intel processors if that makes a difference?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 88
+favouriteCount: 93
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1712572029 {#2247
date: 2024-04-08 12:27:09.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2284 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2286 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2188 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2034 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2156 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2154 …}
+children: []
-id: 26893
-titleTs: "'actual':3 'danger':4 'firefox':7 'root':9 'run':6"
-bodyTs: "'absentmind':73 'access':301 'actual':287 'ad':129,202 'allow':298 'alreadi':322 'also':95,133,159,182 'anyth':111,299 'bad':246 'base':303 'block':124 'browser':137,251 'command':30,48 'configur':117 'conveni':44 'cross':236 'cybersecur':262 'danger':329 'data':346 'definit':230 'desktop':53,91 'didn':210 'differ':368 'direct':56 'discuss':283 'doctrin':263 'error':220 'even':102 'everi':294 'everyon':257 'exact':186 'fedora':357 'figur':143 'file':35 'find':41,80 'firefox':85,291 'first':154 'general':261 'get':224 'go':212 'happen':160 'home':8 'howev':130 'idea':247 'import':165 'ing':59 'initi':205 'instal':105 'instanc':86,122,151 'instead':54 'intel':362 'issu':68 'kde':21,358 'line':31,49 'linux':5 'log':19 'm':270,334,337 'main':140,170,338 'major':127 'make':366 'manag':17,36 'messag':221 'might':243 'mind':238 'much':328 'nas':171 'never':101,173,235,265 'one':166,279 'onlin':256 'open':37 'order':15 'origin':107 'os':316 'particular':177 'person':39,345 'pihol':121,150,206 'place':155 'plasma':22 'preinstal':84 'probabl':321 'processor':363 'realiz':272 'recent':240 'regular':11 'reinstal':314 'rememb':134,185,200 'remot':12,52,90 'right':317 'riski':285 'root':24,99,194,253 'run':97,356 'sandbox':293 'search':74,218,255 'security/privacy':342 'see':201 'seem':198,280 'server':6,114,141,158,352,355 'set':147 'setup':207 'sever':29 'shadi':178 'shouldn':274,289 'smooth':214 'solut':81 'spin':359 'ssh':58 'ssh-ing':57 'state':259 'stop':307 'store':349 'stuff':75 'suppos':332 'system':62,304 'though':195 'thought':103 'tri':78,222 'ublock':106 'use':46,82,119,135,249 'usual':18,25 'vast':126 've':70,190 'virus':324 'websit':179,188,295 'went':174 'window':32 'within':88 'work':227 'worri':339 'would':94"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1704359289
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/10062491"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1711170613 {#2255
date: 2024-03-23 06:10:13.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704272889 {#2256
date: 2024-01-03 10:08:09.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2318
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 23
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703441663 {#2319
date: 2023-12-24 19:14:23.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2313 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2292 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2290 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2295 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2283 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2282 …}
+children: []
-id: 23902
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703281408
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605164"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703195008 {#2317
date: 2023-12-21 22:43:28.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2318
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 23
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703441663 {#2319
date: 2023-12-24 19:14:23.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2313 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2292 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2290 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2295 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2283 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2282 …}
+children: []
-id: 23902
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703281408
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605164"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703195008 {#2317
date: 2023-12-21 22:43:28.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2318
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 23
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703441663 {#2319
date: 2023-12-24 19:14:23.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2313 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2292 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2290 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2295 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2283 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2282 …}
+children: []
-id: 23902
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703281408
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605164"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703195008 {#2317
date: 2023-12-21 22:43:28.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2331
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Can-one-recover-from-an-accidental-rm-rf-of-system"
+title: "Can one recover from an accidental rm -rf of system directories by copying those files back in from a backup?"
+url: null
+body: """
Well I’ve joined the “accidentally trashing your system with rm -rf” club! Luckily I didn’t delete my home directory with all the things I care about, but I did delete /boot and /usr, and maybe /var (long story, boils down to me trying to delete non-system directories named those but reflexively adding the slash in front when I should not have). I have backups of those as well, so what are my prospects of recovering from this by just copying them back in using a live USB? Only issue is they’re stored in my server as belonging to the server user (I assume everything in those directories should belong to root and I can just use chown?) But I also don’t know if they retain the same permissions when backed up.\n
\n
Has anyone had any luck recovering a system in this way? I’m hoping not to have to reinstall everything because I had gotten pretty cozy with the current installation.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 19
+favouriteCount: 38
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702197100 {#2141
date: 2023-12-10 09:31:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2325 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+children: []
-id: 21174
-titleTs: "'accident':6 'back':16 'backup':20 'copi':13 'directori':11 'file':15 'one':2 'recov':3 'rf':8 'rm':7 'system':10"
-bodyTs: "'/boot':33 '/usr':35 '/var':38 'accident':6 'ad':56 'also':125 'anyon':139 'assum':108 'back':86,136 'backup':68 'belong':102,114 'boil':41 'care':27 'chown':122 'club':13 'copi':84 'cozi':163 'current':166 'delet':18,32,47 'didn':16 'directori':21,51,112 'everyth':109,157 'front':60 'gotten':161 'home':20 'hope':151 'instal':167 'issu':93 'join':4 'know':128 'live':90 'long':39 'luck':142 'luckili':14 'm':150 'mayb':37 'name':52 'non':49 'non-system':48 'permiss':134 'pretti':162 'prospect':77 're':96 'recov':79,143 'reflex':55 'reinstal':156 'retain':131 'rf':12 'rm':11 'root':116 'server':100,105 'slash':58 'store':97 'stori':40 'system':9,50,145 'thing':25 'trash':7 'tri':45 'usb':91 'use':88,121 'user':106 've':3 'way':148 'well':1,72"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702115144
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9032262"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703484244 {#2060
date: 2023-12-25 07:04:04.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702028744 {#2164
date: 2023-12-08 10:45:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2331
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Can-one-recover-from-an-accidental-rm-rf-of-system"
+title: "Can one recover from an accidental rm -rf of system directories by copying those files back in from a backup?"
+url: null
+body: """
Well I’ve joined the “accidentally trashing your system with rm -rf” club! Luckily I didn’t delete my home directory with all the things I care about, but I did delete /boot and /usr, and maybe /var (long story, boils down to me trying to delete non-system directories named those but reflexively adding the slash in front when I should not have). I have backups of those as well, so what are my prospects of recovering from this by just copying them back in using a live USB? Only issue is they’re stored in my server as belonging to the server user (I assume everything in those directories should belong to root and I can just use chown?) But I also don’t know if they retain the same permissions when backed up.\n
\n
Has anyone had any luck recovering a system in this way? I’m hoping not to have to reinstall everything because I had gotten pretty cozy with the current installation.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 19
+favouriteCount: 38
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702197100 {#2141
date: 2023-12-10 09:31:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2325 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+children: []
-id: 21174
-titleTs: "'accident':6 'back':16 'backup':20 'copi':13 'directori':11 'file':15 'one':2 'recov':3 'rf':8 'rm':7 'system':10"
-bodyTs: "'/boot':33 '/usr':35 '/var':38 'accident':6 'ad':56 'also':125 'anyon':139 'assum':108 'back':86,136 'backup':68 'belong':102,114 'boil':41 'care':27 'chown':122 'club':13 'copi':84 'cozi':163 'current':166 'delet':18,32,47 'didn':16 'directori':21,51,112 'everyth':109,157 'front':60 'gotten':161 'home':20 'hope':151 'instal':167 'issu':93 'join':4 'know':128 'live':90 'long':39 'luck':142 'luckili':14 'm':150 'mayb':37 'name':52 'non':49 'non-system':48 'permiss':134 'pretti':162 'prospect':77 're':96 'recov':79,143 'reflex':55 'reinstal':156 'retain':131 'rf':12 'rm':11 'root':116 'server':100,105 'slash':58 'store':97 'stori':40 'system':9,50,145 'thing':25 'trash':7 'tri':45 'usb':91 'use':88,121 'user':106 've':3 'way':148 'well':1,72"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702115144
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9032262"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703484244 {#2060
date: 2023-12-25 07:04:04.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702028744 {#2164
date: 2023-12-08 10:45:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2331
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Can-one-recover-from-an-accidental-rm-rf-of-system"
+title: "Can one recover from an accidental rm -rf of system directories by copying those files back in from a backup?"
+url: null
+body: """
Well I’ve joined the “accidentally trashing your system with rm -rf” club! Luckily I didn’t delete my home directory with all the things I care about, but I did delete /boot and /usr, and maybe /var (long story, boils down to me trying to delete non-system directories named those but reflexively adding the slash in front when I should not have). I have backups of those as well, so what are my prospects of recovering from this by just copying them back in using a live USB? Only issue is they’re stored in my server as belonging to the server user (I assume everything in those directories should belong to root and I can just use chown?) But I also don’t know if they retain the same permissions when backed up.\n
\n
Has anyone had any luck recovering a system in this way? I’m hoping not to have to reinstall everything because I had gotten pretty cozy with the current installation.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 19
+favouriteCount: 38
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702197100 {#2141
date: 2023-12-10 09:31:40.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2289 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2326 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2325 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2329 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2323 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2300 …}
+children: []
-id: 21174
-titleTs: "'accident':6 'back':16 'backup':20 'copi':13 'directori':11 'file':15 'one':2 'recov':3 'rf':8 'rm':7 'system':10"
-bodyTs: "'/boot':33 '/usr':35 '/var':38 'accident':6 'ad':56 'also':125 'anyon':139 'assum':108 'back':86,136 'backup':68 'belong':102,114 'boil':41 'care':27 'chown':122 'club':13 'copi':84 'cozi':163 'current':166 'delet':18,32,47 'didn':16 'directori':21,51,112 'everyth':109,157 'front':60 'gotten':161 'home':20 'hope':151 'instal':167 'issu':93 'join':4 'know':128 'live':90 'long':39 'luck':142 'luckili':14 'm':150 'mayb':37 'name':52 'non':49 'non-system':48 'permiss':134 'pretti':162 'prospect':77 're':96 'recov':79,143 'reflex':55 'reinstal':156 'retain':131 'rf':12 'rm':11 'root':116 'server':100,105 'slash':58 'store':97 'stori':40 'system':9,50,145 'thing':25 'trash':7 'tri':45 'usb':91 'use':88,121 'user':106 've':3 'way':148 'well':1,72"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702115144
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9032262"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703484244 {#2060
date: 2023-12-25 07:04:04.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702028744 {#2164
date: 2023-12-08 10:45:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2297
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Does-cp-v-print-out-the-file-name-when-it"
+title: "Does `cp -v` print out the file name when it starts copying it or when it's done?"
+url: null
+body: "So if I had a `cp -v` operation fail, is the last file name it printed out the last successful file copy, or is it the failed partially copied file? If you had to ensure all files are copied correctly without overwriting anything, would deleting the last filename that was printed from the destination folder delete the partially copied file that the operation failed on?"
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702123983 {#2309
date: 2023-12-09 13:13:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2320 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2322 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2312 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2307 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2308 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2304 …}
+children: []
-id: 20822
-titleTs: "'copi':12 'cp':2 'done':18 'file':7 'name':8 'print':4 'start':11 'v':3"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'copi':22,29,39,59 'correct':40 'cp':6 'delet':45,56 'destin':54 'ensur':35 'fail':9,27,64 'file':13,21,30,37,60 'filenam':48 'folder':55 'last':12,19,47 'name':14 'oper':8,63 'overwrit':42 'partial':28,58 'print':16,51 'success':20 'v':7 'without':41 'would':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702023020
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/8984919"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703304530 {#2301
date: 2023-12-23 05:08:50.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701936620 {#2302
date: 2023-12-07 09:10:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2297
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Does-cp-v-print-out-the-file-name-when-it"
+title: "Does `cp -v` print out the file name when it starts copying it or when it's done?"
+url: null
+body: "So if I had a `cp -v` operation fail, is the last file name it printed out the last successful file copy, or is it the failed partially copied file? If you had to ensure all files are copied correctly without overwriting anything, would deleting the last filename that was printed from the destination folder delete the partially copied file that the operation failed on?"
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702123983 {#2309
date: 2023-12-09 13:13:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2320 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2322 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2312 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2307 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2308 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2304 …}
+children: []
-id: 20822
-titleTs: "'copi':12 'cp':2 'done':18 'file':7 'name':8 'print':4 'start':11 'v':3"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'copi':22,29,39,59 'correct':40 'cp':6 'delet':45,56 'destin':54 'ensur':35 'fail':9,27,64 'file':13,21,30,37,60 'filenam':48 'folder':55 'last':12,19,47 'name':14 'oper':8,63 'overwrit':42 'partial':28,58 'print':16,51 'success':20 'v':7 'without':41 'would':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702023020
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/8984919"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703304530 {#2301
date: 2023-12-23 05:08:50.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701936620 {#2302
date: 2023-12-07 09:10:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2297
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2314 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Does-cp-v-print-out-the-file-name-when-it"
+title: "Does `cp -v` print out the file name when it starts copying it or when it's done?"
+url: null
+body: "So if I had a `cp -v` operation fail, is the last file name it printed out the last successful file copy, or is it the failed partially copied file? If you had to ensure all files are copied correctly without overwriting anything, would deleting the last filename that was printed from the destination folder delete the partially copied file that the operation failed on?"
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702123983 {#2309
date: 2023-12-09 13:13:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2320 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2322 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2312 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2307 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2308 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2304 …}
+children: []
-id: 20822
-titleTs: "'copi':12 'cp':2 'done':18 'file':7 'name':8 'print':4 'start':11 'v':3"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'copi':22,29,39,59 'correct':40 'cp':6 'delet':45,56 'destin':54 'ensur':35 'fail':9,27,64 'file':13,21,30,37,60 'filenam':48 'folder':55 'last':12,19,47 'name':14 'oper':8,63 'overwrit':42 'partial':28,58 'print':16,51 'success':20 'v':7 'without':41 'would':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702023020
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/8984919"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703304530 {#2301
date: 2023-12-23 05:08:50.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701936620 {#2302
date: 2023-12-07 09:10:20.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
17 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
18 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2202
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2201 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive? (on Linux)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 12
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703240271 {#2197
date: 2023-12-22 11:17:51.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2210 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2207 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2208 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2204 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2211 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2266 …}
+children: []
-id: 23901
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'linux':31 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703267464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605162"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706162891 {#2205
date: 2024-01-25 07:08:11.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703194964 {#2206
date: 2023-12-21 22:42:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
19 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2202
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2201 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive? (on Linux)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 12
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703240271 {#2197
date: 2023-12-22 11:17:51.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2210 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2207 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2208 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2204 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2211 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2266 …}
+children: []
-id: 23901
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'linux':31 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703267464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605162"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706162891 {#2205
date: 2024-01-25 07:08:11.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703194964 {#2206
date: 2023-12-21 22:42:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
20 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2202
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2201 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "What-s-an-elegant-way-of-automatically-backing-up-the-contents"
+title: "What's an elegant way of automatically backing up the contents of a large drive to multiple smaller drives that add up to the capacity of the large drive? (on Linux)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I have a nearly full 4 TB hard drive in my server that I want to make an offline backup of. However, the only spare hard drives I have are a few 500 GB and 1 TB ones, so the entire contents will not fit all at once, but I do have enough total space for it. I also only have one USB hard drive dock so I can only plug in one hard drive at a time, and in any case I don’t want to do any sort of RAID 0 or striping because the hard drives are old and I don’t want a single one of them failing to make the entire backup unrecoverable.\n
\n
I could just play digital Tetris and just manually copy over individual directories to each smaller drive until they fill up while mentally keeping track of which directories still need to be copied when I change drives, but I’m hoping for a more automatic and less error prone way. Ideally, I’d want something that can automatically begin copying the entire contents of a given drive or directory to a drive that isn’t big enough to fit everything, automatically round down to the last file that will fit in its entirety (I don’t want to split files between drives), and then wait for me to unplug the first drive and plug in another drive and specify a new mount point before continuing to copy the remaining files, using as many drives as necessary to copy everything.\n
\n
Does anyone know of something that can accomplish all of this on a Linux system?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 12
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1703240271 {#2197
date: 2023-12-22 11:17:51.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2210 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2207 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2208 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2204 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2211 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2266 …}
+children: []
-id: 23901
-titleTs: "'add':21 'automat':7 'back':8 'capac':25 'content':11 'drive':15,19,29 'eleg':4 'larg':14,28 'linux':31 'multipl':17 'smaller':18 'way':5"
-bodyTs: "'0':94 '1':37 '4':7 '500':34 'accomplish':266 'also':60 'anoth':235 'anyon':260 'automat':164,177,200 'backup':21,118 'begin':178 'big':195 'case':83 'chang':155 'content':43,182 'continu':244 'copi':129,152,179,246,257 'could':121 'd':172 'digit':124 'directori':132,147,188 'dock':67 'drive':10,28,66,76,100,136,156,186,191,221,231,236,253 'enough':54,196 'entir':42,117,181 'entireti':212 'error':167 'everyth':199,258 'fail':113 'file':206,219,249 'fill':139 'first':230 'fit':46,198,209 'full':6 'gb':35 'given':185 'hard':9,27,65,75,99 'hope':160 'howev':23 'ideal':170 'individu':131 'isn':193 'keep':143 'know':261 'last':205 'less':166 'linux':272 'm':159 'make':18,115 'mani':252 'manual':128 'mental':142 'mount':241 'near':5 'necessari':255 'need':149 'new':240 'offlin':20 'old':102 'one':39,63,74,110 'play':123 'plug':72,233 'point':242 'prone':168 'raid':93 'remain':248 'round':201 'server':13 'singl':109 'smaller':135 'someth':174,263 'sort':91 'space':56 'spare':26 'specifi':238 'split':218 'still':148 'stripe':96 'system':273 'tb':8,38 'tetri':125 'time':79 'total':55 'track':144 'unplug':228 'unrecover':119 'usb':64 'use':250 'wait':224 'want':16,87,107,173,216 'way':169"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703267464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/9605162"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1706162891 {#2205
date: 2024-01-25 07:08:11.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703194964 {#2206
date: 2023-12-21 22:42:44.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
21 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
22 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1405
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1385 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Itemizer-Orbs-are-easily-the-most-horrifying-items-in-Pokemon"
+title: "Itemizer Orbs are easily the most horrifying items in Pokemon Mystery Dungeon."
+url: null
+body: """
Imagine being an enemy Pokemon that gets hit by an itemizer orb. One instant, you were a living organism, the next, you’re an object. This raises all kinds of existential questions that get scarier the more you think about it. At what point are you killed by the process? The best case scenario for you is that you die the instant the magic hits you and the rest is moot.\n
\n
But if that doesn’t happen… Hoo boy. Will you feel your body being compressed and transmuted into an Oran Berry? Will you feel the excruciating pain as your nerves are destroyed at the atomic level to be turned into plant cells and sugar? The Lore in PMD very heavily implies the existence of some sort of life energy that animates living things, so what if that life energy stays in the thing you’re turned into? Object Pokemon like Chimecho and Trubbish exist, so it’s entirely possible that your life energy can just keep on existing inside the item you’re turned into. Imagine being stuck as an item, conscious, but unable to move and with no senses to tell you about the outside world. Nothing but your own thoughts to keep your company. You’re initially terrified of the prospect that you’ll be eaten if you turned into food or used up in battle if you’re an orb or something. But after days, weeks, months, without sensory input or anything but your own increasingly incoherent thoughts, mind broken by complete isolation, you begin to crave the sweet release of death. You begin to desperately hope that you’ll be gobbled up by the next explorer that happens by you, or deployed in a battle, or at least be taken to the recycle shop, anything that will let your aura escape and your life to end–at least you hope that’s what will happen when your “body” is destroyed. But it’s not like you can do anything to cause or avoid it, nor will you be able to see it coming anyhow. You just hope that you won’t be able to feel pain in this state, but in the Pokemon universe, not even that is a given.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693834921 {#1383
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1401 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1363 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+children: []
-id: 27063
-titleTs: "'dungeon':12 'easili':4 'horrifi':7 'item':1,8 'mysteri':11 'orb':2 'pokemon':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':344,358 'anim':132 'anyhow':349 'anyth':246,300,334 'atom':106 'aura':305 'avoid':338 'battl':229,290 'begin':259,268 'berri':92 'best':52 'bodi':84,323 'boy':79 'broken':254 'case':53 'caus':336 'cell':113 'chimecho':152 'come':348 'compani':207 'complet':256 'compress':86 'conscious':183 'crave':261 'day':239 'death':266 'deploy':287 'desper':270 'destroy':103,325 'die':60 'doesn':75 'eaten':219 'end':311 'enemi':4 'energi':130,140,164 'entir':159 'escap':306 'even':371 'excruci':97 'exist':124,155,169 'existenti':31 'explor':281 'feel':82,95,360 'food':224 'get':7,34 'given':375 'gobbl':276 'happen':77,283,320 'heavili':121 'hit':8,65 'hoo':78 'hope':271,315,352 'imagin':1,177 'impli':122 'incoher':251 'increas':250 'initi':210 'input':244 'insid':170 'instant':14,62 'isol':257 'item':11,172,182 'keep':167,205 'kill':47 'kind':29 'least':293,313 'let':303 'level':107 'life':129,139,163,309 'like':151,330 'live':18,133 'll':217,274 'lore':117 'magic':64 'mind':253 'month':241 'moot':71 'move':187 'nerv':101 'next':21,280 'noth':199 'object':25,149 'one':13 'oran':91 'orb':12,234 'organ':19 'outsid':197 'pain':98,361 'plant':112 'pmd':119 'point':44 'pokemon':5,150,368 'possibl':160 'process':50 'prospect':214 'question':32 'rais':27 're':23,146,174,209,232 'recycl':298 'releas':264 'rest':69 'scarier':35 'scenario':54 'see':346 'sens':191 'sensori':243 'shop':299 'someth':236 'sort':127 'state':364 'stay':141 'stuck':179 'sugar':115 'sweet':263 'taken':295 'tell':193 'terrifi':211 'thing':134,144 'think':39 'thought':203,252 'transmut':88 'trubbish':154 'turn':110,147,175,222 'unabl':185 'univers':369 'use':226 'week':240 'without':242 'won':355 'world':198"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/4392743"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693834921 {#1402
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
23 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1405
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1385 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Itemizer-Orbs-are-easily-the-most-horrifying-items-in-Pokemon"
+title: "Itemizer Orbs are easily the most horrifying items in Pokemon Mystery Dungeon."
+url: null
+body: """
Imagine being an enemy Pokemon that gets hit by an itemizer orb. One instant, you were a living organism, the next, you’re an object. This raises all kinds of existential questions that get scarier the more you think about it. At what point are you killed by the process? The best case scenario for you is that you die the instant the magic hits you and the rest is moot.\n
\n
But if that doesn’t happen… Hoo boy. Will you feel your body being compressed and transmuted into an Oran Berry? Will you feel the excruciating pain as your nerves are destroyed at the atomic level to be turned into plant cells and sugar? The Lore in PMD very heavily implies the existence of some sort of life energy that animates living things, so what if that life energy stays in the thing you’re turned into? Object Pokemon like Chimecho and Trubbish exist, so it’s entirely possible that your life energy can just keep on existing inside the item you’re turned into. Imagine being stuck as an item, conscious, but unable to move and with no senses to tell you about the outside world. Nothing but your own thoughts to keep your company. You’re initially terrified of the prospect that you’ll be eaten if you turned into food or used up in battle if you’re an orb or something. But after days, weeks, months, without sensory input or anything but your own increasingly incoherent thoughts, mind broken by complete isolation, you begin to crave the sweet release of death. You begin to desperately hope that you’ll be gobbled up by the next explorer that happens by you, or deployed in a battle, or at least be taken to the recycle shop, anything that will let your aura escape and your life to end–at least you hope that’s what will happen when your “body” is destroyed. But it’s not like you can do anything to cause or avoid it, nor will you be able to see it coming anyhow. You just hope that you won’t be able to feel pain in this state, but in the Pokemon universe, not even that is a given.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693834921 {#1383
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1401 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1363 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+children: []
-id: 27063
-titleTs: "'dungeon':12 'easili':4 'horrifi':7 'item':1,8 'mysteri':11 'orb':2 'pokemon':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':344,358 'anim':132 'anyhow':349 'anyth':246,300,334 'atom':106 'aura':305 'avoid':338 'battl':229,290 'begin':259,268 'berri':92 'best':52 'bodi':84,323 'boy':79 'broken':254 'case':53 'caus':336 'cell':113 'chimecho':152 'come':348 'compani':207 'complet':256 'compress':86 'conscious':183 'crave':261 'day':239 'death':266 'deploy':287 'desper':270 'destroy':103,325 'die':60 'doesn':75 'eaten':219 'end':311 'enemi':4 'energi':130,140,164 'entir':159 'escap':306 'even':371 'excruci':97 'exist':124,155,169 'existenti':31 'explor':281 'feel':82,95,360 'food':224 'get':7,34 'given':375 'gobbl':276 'happen':77,283,320 'heavili':121 'hit':8,65 'hoo':78 'hope':271,315,352 'imagin':1,177 'impli':122 'incoher':251 'increas':250 'initi':210 'input':244 'insid':170 'instant':14,62 'isol':257 'item':11,172,182 'keep':167,205 'kill':47 'kind':29 'least':293,313 'let':303 'level':107 'life':129,139,163,309 'like':151,330 'live':18,133 'll':217,274 'lore':117 'magic':64 'mind':253 'month':241 'moot':71 'move':187 'nerv':101 'next':21,280 'noth':199 'object':25,149 'one':13 'oran':91 'orb':12,234 'organ':19 'outsid':197 'pain':98,361 'plant':112 'pmd':119 'point':44 'pokemon':5,150,368 'possibl':160 'process':50 'prospect':214 'question':32 'rais':27 're':23,146,174,209,232 'recycl':298 'releas':264 'rest':69 'scarier':35 'scenario':54 'see':346 'sens':191 'sensori':243 'shop':299 'someth':236 'sort':127 'state':364 'stay':141 'stuck':179 'sugar':115 'sweet':263 'taken':295 'tell':193 'terrifi':211 'thing':134,144 'think':39 'thought':203,252 'transmut':88 'trubbish':154 'turn':110,147,175,222 'unabl':185 'univers':369 'use':226 'week':240 'without':242 'won':355 'world':198"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/4392743"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693834921 {#1402
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
24 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1405
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1385 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1382 …}
+slug: "Itemizer-Orbs-are-easily-the-most-horrifying-items-in-Pokemon"
+title: "Itemizer Orbs are easily the most horrifying items in Pokemon Mystery Dungeon."
+url: null
+body: """
Imagine being an enemy Pokemon that gets hit by an itemizer orb. One instant, you were a living organism, the next, you’re an object. This raises all kinds of existential questions that get scarier the more you think about it. At what point are you killed by the process? The best case scenario for you is that you die the instant the magic hits you and the rest is moot.\n
\n
But if that doesn’t happen… Hoo boy. Will you feel your body being compressed and transmuted into an Oran Berry? Will you feel the excruciating pain as your nerves are destroyed at the atomic level to be turned into plant cells and sugar? The Lore in PMD very heavily implies the existence of some sort of life energy that animates living things, so what if that life energy stays in the thing you’re turned into? Object Pokemon like Chimecho and Trubbish exist, so it’s entirely possible that your life energy can just keep on existing inside the item you’re turned into. Imagine being stuck as an item, conscious, but unable to move and with no senses to tell you about the outside world. Nothing but your own thoughts to keep your company. You’re initially terrified of the prospect that you’ll be eaten if you turned into food or used up in battle if you’re an orb or something. But after days, weeks, months, without sensory input or anything but your own increasingly incoherent thoughts, mind broken by complete isolation, you begin to crave the sweet release of death. You begin to desperately hope that you’ll be gobbled up by the next explorer that happens by you, or deployed in a battle, or at least be taken to the recycle shop, anything that will let your aura escape and your life to end–at least you hope that’s what will happen when your “body” is destroyed. But it’s not like you can do anything to cause or avoid it, nor will you be able to see it coming anyhow. You just hope that you won’t be able to feel pain in this state, but in the Pokemon universe, not even that is a given.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693834921 {#1383
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1401 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1363 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1362 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2019 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2030 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2026 …}
+children: []
-id: 27063
-titleTs: "'dungeon':12 'easili':4 'horrifi':7 'item':1,8 'mysteri':11 'orb':2 'pokemon':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':344,358 'anim':132 'anyhow':349 'anyth':246,300,334 'atom':106 'aura':305 'avoid':338 'battl':229,290 'begin':259,268 'berri':92 'best':52 'bodi':84,323 'boy':79 'broken':254 'case':53 'caus':336 'cell':113 'chimecho':152 'come':348 'compani':207 'complet':256 'compress':86 'conscious':183 'crave':261 'day':239 'death':266 'deploy':287 'desper':270 'destroy':103,325 'die':60 'doesn':75 'eaten':219 'end':311 'enemi':4 'energi':130,140,164 'entir':159 'escap':306 'even':371 'excruci':97 'exist':124,155,169 'existenti':31 'explor':281 'feel':82,95,360 'food':224 'get':7,34 'given':375 'gobbl':276 'happen':77,283,320 'heavili':121 'hit':8,65 'hoo':78 'hope':271,315,352 'imagin':1,177 'impli':122 'incoher':251 'increas':250 'initi':210 'input':244 'insid':170 'instant':14,62 'isol':257 'item':11,172,182 'keep':167,205 'kill':47 'kind':29 'least':293,313 'let':303 'level':107 'life':129,139,163,309 'like':151,330 'live':18,133 'll':217,274 'lore':117 'magic':64 'mind':253 'month':241 'moot':71 'move':187 'nerv':101 'next':21,280 'noth':199 'object':25,149 'one':13 'oran':91 'orb':12,234 'organ':19 'outsid':197 'pain':98,361 'plant':112 'pmd':119 'point':44 'pokemon':5,150,368 'possibl':160 'process':50 'prospect':214 'question':32 'rais':27 're':23,146,174,209,232 'recycl':298 'releas':264 'rest':69 'scarier':35 'scenario':54 'see':346 'sens':191 'sensori':243 'shop':299 'someth':236 'sort':127 'state':364 'stay':141 'stuck':179 'sugar':115 'sweet':263 'taken':295 'tell':193 'terrifi':211 'thing':134,144 'think':39 'thought':203,252 'transmut':88 'trubbish':154 'turn':110,147,175,222 'unabl':185 'univers':369 'use':226 'week':240 'without':242 'won':355 'world':198"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ml/post/4392743"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693834921 {#1402
date: 2023-09-04 15:42:01.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|