GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/m/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world/t/2578/the-FDA-is-considering-a-ban-on-menthol-cigarette-sales/comment/34392/favourites

Response
200 OK
IP
18.118.30.58
Profiled on
Token
cb79d1

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 19.39 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.05 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1396
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1365 …}
  +entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1790 …}
  +magazine: App\Entity\Magazine {#314
    +icon: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#295 …}
    +name: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +title: "mildlyinteresting"
    +description: """
      This is for strictly *mildly* interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.\n
      \n
      This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?\n
      \n
      Just post some stuff and don’t spam.
      """
    +rules: null
    +subscriptionsCount: 1
    +entryCount: 307
    +entryCommentCount: 6090
    +postCount: 0
    +postCommentCount: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +customCss: null
    +lastActive: DateTime @1729579416 {#322
      date: 2024-10-22 08:43:36.0 +02:00
    }
    +markedForDeletionAt: null
    +tags: null
    +moderators: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#286 …}
    +ownershipRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#282 …}
    +moderatorRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#271 …}
    +entries: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#229 …}
    +posts: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#187 …}
    +subscriptions: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#249 …}
    +bans: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#166 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#152 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#130 …}
    +logs: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#120 …}
    +awards: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#109 …}
    +categories: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#96 …}
    -id: 20
    +apId: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +apProfileId: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apPublicUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apFollowersUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting/followers"
    +apInboxUrl: "https://lemmy.world/inbox"
    +apDomain: "lemmy.world"
    +apPreferredUsername: "mildlyinteresting"
    +apDiscoverable: true
    +apManuallyApprovesFollowers: null
    +privateKey: null
    +publicKey: null
    +apFetchedAt: DateTime @1729563669 {#323
      date: 2024-10-22 04:21:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +apDeletedAt: null
    +apTimeoutAt: null
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689840443 {#317
      date: 2023-07-20 10:07:23.0 +02:00
    }
  }
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2466 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2355 …}
  +body: """
    If they banned all alcohol for everyone, its indiscriminate, and I would not consider it to be discrimination (I’d consider it a bad idea based on the obvious). In your example, a ban on wine, but not whiskey, with the publicly stated intention of reducing alcohol intake among women, would be the equivalent, and I’d absolutely consider that misogynistic. In the case of a wine ban, yes, it would be immoral to impose that ban, because it would be targeted at women specifically.\n
    \n
    They aren’t banning cigarettes. They’re banning menthols, and the publicly stated intent is to affect use of cigarettes among minorities. The policy is specifically intended to affect a demographic. Not because I say so, or because I think it does… it’s what they’re citing as the basis of the policy… they published it as such.\n
    \n
    The pragmatic solution is to ban cigarettes. That would still affect the minorities disparately, but it’s no longer an inherently racist proposal at that point, because it’s about tobacco use period, not just the tobacco use specific to the minorities.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1696572620 {#1768
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world"
    "@aelwero@lemmy.world"
    "@TheFrirish@jlai.lu"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2167 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2357 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2429 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2442 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1359 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2485 …}
  -id: 34392
  -bodyTs: "'absolut':58 'affect':102,114,155 'alcohol':5,47 'among':49,106 'aren':87 'bad':24 'ban':3,34,68,77,89,93,150 'base':26 'basi':136 'case':64 'cigarett':90,105,151 'cite':133 'consid':14,21,59 'd':20,57 'demograph':116 'discrimin':18 'dispar':158 'equival':54 'everyon':7 'exampl':32 'idea':25 'immor':73 'impos':75 'indiscrimin':9 'inher':165 'intak':48 'intend':112 'intent':44,99 'longer':163 'menthol':94 'minor':107,157,186 'misogynist':61 'obvious':29 'period':177 'point':170 'polici':109,139 'pragmat':146 'propos':167 'public':42,97 'publish':141 'racist':166 're':92,132 'reduc':46 'say':120 'solut':147 'specif':85,111,183 'state':43,98 'still':154 'target':82 'think':125 'tobacco':175,181 'use':103,176,182 'whiskey':39 'wine':36,67 'women':50,84 'would':12,51,71,80,153 'yes':69"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/4178093"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696572620 {#1938
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1396
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1365 …}
  +entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1790 …}
  +magazine: App\Entity\Magazine {#314
    +icon: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#295 …}
    +name: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +title: "mildlyinteresting"
    +description: """
      This is for strictly *mildly* interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.\n
      \n
      This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?\n
      \n
      Just post some stuff and don’t spam.
      """
    +rules: null
    +subscriptionsCount: 1
    +entryCount: 307
    +entryCommentCount: 6090
    +postCount: 0
    +postCommentCount: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +customCss: null
    +lastActive: DateTime @1729579416 {#322
      date: 2024-10-22 08:43:36.0 +02:00
    }
    +markedForDeletionAt: null
    +tags: null
    +moderators: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#286 …}
    +ownershipRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#282 …}
    +moderatorRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#271 …}
    +entries: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#229 …}
    +posts: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#187 …}
    +subscriptions: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#249 …}
    +bans: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#166 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#152 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#130 …}
    +logs: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#120 …}
    +awards: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#109 …}
    +categories: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#96 …}
    -id: 20
    +apId: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +apProfileId: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apPublicUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apFollowersUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting/followers"
    +apInboxUrl: "https://lemmy.world/inbox"
    +apDomain: "lemmy.world"
    +apPreferredUsername: "mildlyinteresting"
    +apDiscoverable: true
    +apManuallyApprovesFollowers: null
    +privateKey: null
    +publicKey: null
    +apFetchedAt: DateTime @1729563669 {#323
      date: 2024-10-22 04:21:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +apDeletedAt: null
    +apTimeoutAt: null
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689840443 {#317
      date: 2023-07-20 10:07:23.0 +02:00
    }
  }
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2466 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2355 …}
  +body: """
    If they banned all alcohol for everyone, its indiscriminate, and I would not consider it to be discrimination (I’d consider it a bad idea based on the obvious). In your example, a ban on wine, but not whiskey, with the publicly stated intention of reducing alcohol intake among women, would be the equivalent, and I’d absolutely consider that misogynistic. In the case of a wine ban, yes, it would be immoral to impose that ban, because it would be targeted at women specifically.\n
    \n
    They aren’t banning cigarettes. They’re banning menthols, and the publicly stated intent is to affect use of cigarettes among minorities. The policy is specifically intended to affect a demographic. Not because I say so, or because I think it does… it’s what they’re citing as the basis of the policy… they published it as such.\n
    \n
    The pragmatic solution is to ban cigarettes. That would still affect the minorities disparately, but it’s no longer an inherently racist proposal at that point, because it’s about tobacco use period, not just the tobacco use specific to the minorities.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1696572620 {#1768
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world"
    "@aelwero@lemmy.world"
    "@TheFrirish@jlai.lu"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2167 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2357 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2429 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2442 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1359 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2485 …}
  -id: 34392
  -bodyTs: "'absolut':58 'affect':102,114,155 'alcohol':5,47 'among':49,106 'aren':87 'bad':24 'ban':3,34,68,77,89,93,150 'base':26 'basi':136 'case':64 'cigarett':90,105,151 'cite':133 'consid':14,21,59 'd':20,57 'demograph':116 'discrimin':18 'dispar':158 'equival':54 'everyon':7 'exampl':32 'idea':25 'immor':73 'impos':75 'indiscrimin':9 'inher':165 'intak':48 'intend':112 'intent':44,99 'longer':163 'menthol':94 'minor':107,157,186 'misogynist':61 'obvious':29 'period':177 'point':170 'polici':109,139 'pragmat':146 'propos':167 'public':42,97 'publish':141 'racist':166 're':92,132 'reduc':46 'say':120 'solut':147 'specif':85,111,183 'state':43,98 'still':154 'target':82 'think':125 'tobacco':175,181 'use':103,176,182 'whiskey':39 'wine':36,67 'women':50,84 'would':12,51,71,80,153 'yes':69"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/4178093"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696572620 {#1938
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1396
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1365 …}
  +entry: App\Entity\Entry {#1790 …}
  +magazine: App\Entity\Magazine {#314
    +icon: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#295 …}
    +name: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +title: "mildlyinteresting"
    +description: """
      This is for strictly *mildly* interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.\n
      \n
      This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?\n
      \n
      Just post some stuff and don’t spam.
      """
    +rules: null
    +subscriptionsCount: 1
    +entryCount: 307
    +entryCommentCount: 6090
    +postCount: 0
    +postCommentCount: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +customCss: null
    +lastActive: DateTime @1729579416 {#322
      date: 2024-10-22 08:43:36.0 +02:00
    }
    +markedForDeletionAt: null
    +tags: null
    +moderators: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#286 …}
    +ownershipRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#282 …}
    +moderatorRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#271 …}
    +entries: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#229 …}
    +posts: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#187 …}
    +subscriptions: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#249 …}
    +bans: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#166 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#152 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#130 …}
    +logs: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#120 …}
    +awards: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#109 …}
    +categories: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#96 …}
    -id: 20
    +apId: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
    +apProfileId: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apPublicUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
    +apFollowersUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting/followers"
    +apInboxUrl: "https://lemmy.world/inbox"
    +apDomain: "lemmy.world"
    +apPreferredUsername: "mildlyinteresting"
    +apDiscoverable: true
    +apManuallyApprovesFollowers: null
    +privateKey: null
    +publicKey: null
    +apFetchedAt: DateTime @1729563669 {#323
      date: 2024-10-22 04:21:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +apDeletedAt: null
    +apTimeoutAt: null
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689840443 {#317
      date: 2023-07-20 10:07:23.0 +02:00
    }
  }
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2466 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2355 …}
  +body: """
    If they banned all alcohol for everyone, its indiscriminate, and I would not consider it to be discrimination (I’d consider it a bad idea based on the obvious). In your example, a ban on wine, but not whiskey, with the publicly stated intention of reducing alcohol intake among women, would be the equivalent, and I’d absolutely consider that misogynistic. In the case of a wine ban, yes, it would be immoral to impose that ban, because it would be targeted at women specifically.\n
    \n
    They aren’t banning cigarettes. They’re banning menthols, and the publicly stated intent is to affect use of cigarettes among minorities. The policy is specifically intended to affect a demographic. Not because I say so, or because I think it does… it’s what they’re citing as the basis of the policy… they published it as such.\n
    \n
    The pragmatic solution is to ban cigarettes. That would still affect the minorities disparately, but it’s no longer an inherently racist proposal at that point, because it’s about tobacco use period, not just the tobacco use specific to the minorities.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 0
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1696572620 {#1768
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world"
    "@aelwero@lemmy.world"
    "@TheFrirish@jlai.lu"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2167 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2357 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2429 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2442 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1359 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2485 …}
  -id: 34392
  -bodyTs: "'absolut':58 'affect':102,114,155 'alcohol':5,47 'among':49,106 'aren':87 'bad':24 'ban':3,34,68,77,89,93,150 'base':26 'basi':136 'case':64 'cigarett':90,105,151 'cite':133 'consid':14,21,59 'd':20,57 'demograph':116 'discrimin':18 'dispar':158 'equival':54 'everyon':7 'exampl':32 'idea':25 'immor':73 'impos':75 'indiscrimin':9 'inher':165 'intak':48 'intend':112 'intent':44,99 'longer':163 'menthol':94 'minor':107,157,186 'misogynist':61 'obvious':29 'period':177 'point':170 'polici':109,139 'pragmat':146 'propos':167 'public':42,97 'publish':141 'racist':166 're':92,132 'reduc':46 'say':120 'solut':147 'specif':85,111,183 'state':43,98 'still':154 'target':82 'think':125 'tobacco':175,181 'use':103,176,182 'whiskey':39 'wine':36,67 'women':50,84 'would':12,51,71,80,153 'yes':69"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/4178093"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696572620 {#1938
    date: 2023-10-06 08:10:20.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\Magazine {#314
  +icon: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#295 …}
  +name: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
  +title: "mildlyinteresting"
  +description: """
    This is for strictly *mildly* interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.\n
    \n
    This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?\n
    \n
    Just post some stuff and don’t spam.
    """
  +rules: null
  +subscriptionsCount: 1
  +entryCount: 307
  +entryCommentCount: 6090
  +postCount: 0
  +postCommentCount: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +customCss: null
  +lastActive: DateTime @1729579416 {#322
    date: 2024-10-22 08:43:36.0 +02:00
  }
  +markedForDeletionAt: null
  +tags: null
  +moderators: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#286 …}
  +ownershipRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#282 …}
  +moderatorRequests: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#271 …}
  +entries: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#229 …}
  +posts: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#187 …}
  +subscriptions: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#249 …}
  +bans: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#166 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#152 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#130 …}
  +logs: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#120 …}
  +awards: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#109 …}
  +categories: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#96 …}
  -id: 20
  +apId: "mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world"
  +apProfileId: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
  +apPublicUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting"
  +apFollowersUrl: "https://lemmy.world/c/mildlyinteresting/followers"
  +apInboxUrl: "https://lemmy.world/inbox"
  +apDomain: "lemmy.world"
  +apPreferredUsername: "mildlyinteresting"
  +apDiscoverable: true
  +apManuallyApprovesFollowers: null
  +privateKey: null
  +publicKey: null
  +apFetchedAt: DateTime @1729563669 {#323
    date: 2024-10-22 04:21:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +apDeletedAt: null
  +apTimeoutAt: null
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689840443 {#317
    date: 2023-07-20 10:07:23.0 +02:00
  }
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details