1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1576
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "recommendations-for-lightweight-window-managers-for-an-old-netbook"
+title: "recommendations for lightweight window managers for an old netbook"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi, I’ve got an old netbook from Samsung that has an old Intel Atom CPU (Intel Atom N455 1.66 GHz). I installed Arch on it and am now thinking of a suitable window manager. I tried Hyprland (kinda expecting it to not work really) whick didn’t start at all. Before I had Debian with Gnome, which technically worked, but everything was extremely slow.\n
\n
I’ve used Gnome for a long time, but I know that there are a lot of other window managers out there. I would like to have one that avoids graphical gimmickry in order to be fast. (I like some nice little graphical details, but only if it’s still running buttery smooth).\n
\n
If you have some tips that would be very nice!\n
\n
EDIT: thank you for all the recommendations I’ll try out a few!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 44
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702643491 {#1572
date: 2023-12-15 13:31:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 21671
-titleTs: "'lightweight':3 'manag':5 'netbook':9 'old':8 'recommend':1 'window':4"
-bodyTs: "'1.66':20 'arch':24 'atom':15,18 'avoid':95 'butteri':117 'cpu':16 'debian':55 'detail':109 'didn':47 'edit':129 'everyth':62 'expect':40 'extrem':64 'fast':102 'ghz':21 'gimmickri':97 'gnome':57,69 'got':4 'graphic':96,108 'hi':1 'hyprland':38 'instal':23 'intel':14,17 'kinda':39 'know':76 'like':90,104 'littl':107 'll':137 'long':72 'lot':81 'manag':35,85 'n455':19 'netbook':7 'nice':106,128 'old':6,13 'one':93 'order':99 'realli':45 'recommend':135 'run':116 'samsung':9 'slow':65 'smooth':118 'start':49 'still':115 'suitabl':33 'technic':59 'thank':130 'think':30 'time':73 'tip':123 'tri':37,138 'use':68 've':3,67 'whick':46 'window':34,84 'work':44,60 'would':89,125"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702389160
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/7631098"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703902999 {#1660
date: 2023-12-30 03:23:19.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702302760 {#1587
date: 2023-12-11 14:52:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1576
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "recommendations-for-lightweight-window-managers-for-an-old-netbook"
+title: "recommendations for lightweight window managers for an old netbook"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi, I’ve got an old netbook from Samsung that has an old Intel Atom CPU (Intel Atom N455 1.66 GHz). I installed Arch on it and am now thinking of a suitable window manager. I tried Hyprland (kinda expecting it to not work really) whick didn’t start at all. Before I had Debian with Gnome, which technically worked, but everything was extremely slow.\n
\n
I’ve used Gnome for a long time, but I know that there are a lot of other window managers out there. I would like to have one that avoids graphical gimmickry in order to be fast. (I like some nice little graphical details, but only if it’s still running buttery smooth).\n
\n
If you have some tips that would be very nice!\n
\n
EDIT: thank you for all the recommendations I’ll try out a few!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 44
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702643491 {#1572
date: 2023-12-15 13:31:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 21671
-titleTs: "'lightweight':3 'manag':5 'netbook':9 'old':8 'recommend':1 'window':4"
-bodyTs: "'1.66':20 'arch':24 'atom':15,18 'avoid':95 'butteri':117 'cpu':16 'debian':55 'detail':109 'didn':47 'edit':129 'everyth':62 'expect':40 'extrem':64 'fast':102 'ghz':21 'gimmickri':97 'gnome':57,69 'got':4 'graphic':96,108 'hi':1 'hyprland':38 'instal':23 'intel':14,17 'kinda':39 'know':76 'like':90,104 'littl':107 'll':137 'long':72 'lot':81 'manag':35,85 'n455':19 'netbook':7 'nice':106,128 'old':6,13 'one':93 'order':99 'realli':45 'recommend':135 'run':116 'samsung':9 'slow':65 'smooth':118 'start':49 'still':115 'suitabl':33 'technic':59 'thank':130 'think':30 'time':73 'tip':123 'tri':37,138 'use':68 've':3,67 'whick':46 'window':34,84 'work':44,60 'would':89,125"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702389160
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/7631098"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703902999 {#1660
date: 2023-12-30 03:23:19.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702302760 {#1587
date: 2023-12-11 14:52:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1576
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "recommendations-for-lightweight-window-managers-for-an-old-netbook"
+title: "recommendations for lightweight window managers for an old netbook"
+url: null
+body: """
Hi, I’ve got an old netbook from Samsung that has an old Intel Atom CPU (Intel Atom N455 1.66 GHz). I installed Arch on it and am now thinking of a suitable window manager. I tried Hyprland (kinda expecting it to not work really) whick didn’t start at all. Before I had Debian with Gnome, which technically worked, but everything was extremely slow.\n
\n
I’ve used Gnome for a long time, but I know that there are a lot of other window managers out there. I would like to have one that avoids graphical gimmickry in order to be fast. (I like some nice little graphical details, but only if it’s still running buttery smooth).\n
\n
If you have some tips that would be very nice!\n
\n
EDIT: thank you for all the recommendations I’ll try out a few!
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 21
+favouriteCount: 44
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1702643491 {#1572
date: 2023-12-15 13:31:31.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 21671
-titleTs: "'lightweight':3 'manag':5 'netbook':9 'old':8 'recommend':1 'window':4"
-bodyTs: "'1.66':20 'arch':24 'atom':15,18 'avoid':95 'butteri':117 'cpu':16 'debian':55 'detail':109 'didn':47 'edit':129 'everyth':62 'expect':40 'extrem':64 'fast':102 'ghz':21 'gimmickri':97 'gnome':57,69 'got':4 'graphic':96,108 'hi':1 'hyprland':38 'instal':23 'intel':14,17 'kinda':39 'know':76 'like':90,104 'littl':107 'll':137 'long':72 'lot':81 'manag':35,85 'n455':19 'netbook':7 'nice':106,128 'old':6,13 'one':93 'order':99 'realli':45 'recommend':135 'run':116 'samsung':9 'slow':65 'smooth':118 'start':49 'still':115 'suitabl':33 'technic':59 'thank':130 'think':30 'time':73 'tip':123 'tri':37,138 'use':68 've':3,67 'whick':46 'window':34,84 'work':44,60 'would':89,125"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1702389160
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/7631098"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703902999 {#1660
date: 2023-12-30 03:23:19.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702302760 {#1587
date: 2023-12-11 14:52:40.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2461
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2458 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Which-sequels-prequels-spinoffs-made-the-originals-somehow-worse"
+title: "Which sequels/prequels/spinoffs made the originals somehow worse?"
+url: null
+body: """
**The Matrix** is an often used example, but for me it’s the Alien Prequels - especially **Alien: Covenant** really makes the Original **Alien** much worse. When the original was released in 1979 it had the perfect Monster. A dangerous killing machine of *unknown origin*. The missing background of the alien is a big part of its scary mess. It’s a blank space in its mythology that the viewer can fill with *many* explanations. As these explanations are not precise they don’t have to be logically coherent.\n
\n
**Covenant** (and to a lesser degree **Prometeus**) wanted to fill this blank space and tell us the aliens origin. But once you fill out this missing piece of information it is fixed and can only be one piece. There exists now only one *singular* explanation. And its a boring: The Xenomorph is basically a creature with it’s origins on earth (because David, who’s origin is on earth created it).\n
\n
I find this hugely dissapointing. The biggest dangers of deep space are all human in origin is extremely small minded.\n
\n
(Star Trek: Beyond had the same boring plot - the mysterious villain turned out to be a human after all. As if only humans are capable to pose (or create) a serious thread to humans.).\n
\n
What are your examples for franchise-movies that somehow made the original worse?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 52
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1697934357 {#1740
date: 2023-10-22 02:25:57.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+children: []
-id: 6638
-titleTs: "'made':3 'origin':5 'sequels/prequels/spinoffs':2 'somehow':6 'wors':7"
-bodyTs: "'1979':32 'alien':14,17,23,50,106 'background':47 'basic':141 'beyond':182 'big':53 'biggest':166 'blank':62,100 'bore':137,186 'capabl':204 'coher':88 'coven':18,89 'creat':158,208 'creatur':143 'danger':39,167 'david':151 'deep':169 'degre':94 'dissapoint':164 'earth':149,157 'especi':16 'exampl':7,217 'exist':128 'explan':74,77,133 'extrem':177 'fill':71,98,111 'find':161 'fix':120 'franchis':220 'franchise-movi':219 'huge':163 'human':173,196,202,213 'inform':117 'kill':40 'lesser':93 'logic':87 'machin':41 'made':224 'make':20 'mani':73 'matrix':2 'mess':58 'mind':179 'miss':46,114 'monster':37 'movi':221 'much':24 'mysteri':189 'mytholog':66 'often':5 'one':125,131 'origin':22,28,44,107,147,154,175,226 'part':54 'perfect':36 'piec':115,126 'plot':187 'pose':206 'precis':80 'prequel':15 'prometeus':95 'realli':19 'releas':30 'scari':57 'serious':210 'singular':132 'small':178 'somehow':223 'space':63,101,170 'star':180 'tell':103 'thread':211 'trek':181 'turn':191 'unknown':43 'us':104 'use':6 'viewer':69 'villain':190 'want':96 'wors':25,227 'xenomorph':139"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1697891340
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5012425"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804994 {#1717
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:54.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804940 {#2462
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:00.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2461
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2458 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Which-sequels-prequels-spinoffs-made-the-originals-somehow-worse"
+title: "Which sequels/prequels/spinoffs made the originals somehow worse?"
+url: null
+body: """
**The Matrix** is an often used example, but for me it’s the Alien Prequels - especially **Alien: Covenant** really makes the Original **Alien** much worse. When the original was released in 1979 it had the perfect Monster. A dangerous killing machine of *unknown origin*. The missing background of the alien is a big part of its scary mess. It’s a blank space in its mythology that the viewer can fill with *many* explanations. As these explanations are not precise they don’t have to be logically coherent.\n
\n
**Covenant** (and to a lesser degree **Prometeus**) wanted to fill this blank space and tell us the aliens origin. But once you fill out this missing piece of information it is fixed and can only be one piece. There exists now only one *singular* explanation. And its a boring: The Xenomorph is basically a creature with it’s origins on earth (because David, who’s origin is on earth created it).\n
\n
I find this hugely dissapointing. The biggest dangers of deep space are all human in origin is extremely small minded.\n
\n
(Star Trek: Beyond had the same boring plot - the mysterious villain turned out to be a human after all. As if only humans are capable to pose (or create) a serious thread to humans.).\n
\n
What are your examples for franchise-movies that somehow made the original worse?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 52
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1697934357 {#1740
date: 2023-10-22 02:25:57.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+children: []
-id: 6638
-titleTs: "'made':3 'origin':5 'sequels/prequels/spinoffs':2 'somehow':6 'wors':7"
-bodyTs: "'1979':32 'alien':14,17,23,50,106 'background':47 'basic':141 'beyond':182 'big':53 'biggest':166 'blank':62,100 'bore':137,186 'capabl':204 'coher':88 'coven':18,89 'creat':158,208 'creatur':143 'danger':39,167 'david':151 'deep':169 'degre':94 'dissapoint':164 'earth':149,157 'especi':16 'exampl':7,217 'exist':128 'explan':74,77,133 'extrem':177 'fill':71,98,111 'find':161 'fix':120 'franchis':220 'franchise-movi':219 'huge':163 'human':173,196,202,213 'inform':117 'kill':40 'lesser':93 'logic':87 'machin':41 'made':224 'make':20 'mani':73 'matrix':2 'mess':58 'mind':179 'miss':46,114 'monster':37 'movi':221 'much':24 'mysteri':189 'mytholog':66 'often':5 'one':125,131 'origin':22,28,44,107,147,154,175,226 'part':54 'perfect':36 'piec':115,126 'plot':187 'pose':206 'precis':80 'prequel':15 'prometeus':95 'realli':19 'releas':30 'scari':57 'serious':210 'singular':132 'small':178 'somehow':223 'space':63,101,170 'star':180 'tell':103 'thread':211 'trek':181 'turn':191 'unknown':43 'us':104 'use':6 'viewer':69 'villain':190 'want':96 'wors':25,227 'xenomorph':139"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1697891340
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5012425"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804994 {#1717
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:54.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804940 {#2462
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:00.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2461
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2458 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Which-sequels-prequels-spinoffs-made-the-originals-somehow-worse"
+title: "Which sequels/prequels/spinoffs made the originals somehow worse?"
+url: null
+body: """
**The Matrix** is an often used example, but for me it’s the Alien Prequels - especially **Alien: Covenant** really makes the Original **Alien** much worse. When the original was released in 1979 it had the perfect Monster. A dangerous killing machine of *unknown origin*. The missing background of the alien is a big part of its scary mess. It’s a blank space in its mythology that the viewer can fill with *many* explanations. As these explanations are not precise they don’t have to be logically coherent.\n
\n
**Covenant** (and to a lesser degree **Prometeus**) wanted to fill this blank space and tell us the aliens origin. But once you fill out this missing piece of information it is fixed and can only be one piece. There exists now only one *singular* explanation. And its a boring: The Xenomorph is basically a creature with it’s origins on earth (because David, who’s origin is on earth created it).\n
\n
I find this hugely dissapointing. The biggest dangers of deep space are all human in origin is extremely small minded.\n
\n
(Star Trek: Beyond had the same boring plot - the mysterious villain turned out to be a human after all. As if only humans are capable to pose (or create) a serious thread to humans.).\n
\n
What are your examples for franchise-movies that somehow made the original worse?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 52
+favouriteCount: 23
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1697934357 {#1740
date: 2023-10-22 02:25:57.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+children: []
-id: 6638
-titleTs: "'made':3 'origin':5 'sequels/prequels/spinoffs':2 'somehow':6 'wors':7"
-bodyTs: "'1979':32 'alien':14,17,23,50,106 'background':47 'basic':141 'beyond':182 'big':53 'biggest':166 'blank':62,100 'bore':137,186 'capabl':204 'coher':88 'coven':18,89 'creat':158,208 'creatur':143 'danger':39,167 'david':151 'deep':169 'degre':94 'dissapoint':164 'earth':149,157 'especi':16 'exampl':7,217 'exist':128 'explan':74,77,133 'extrem':177 'fill':71,98,111 'find':161 'fix':120 'franchis':220 'franchise-movi':219 'huge':163 'human':173,196,202,213 'inform':117 'kill':40 'lesser':93 'logic':87 'machin':41 'made':224 'make':20 'mani':73 'matrix':2 'mess':58 'mind':179 'miss':46,114 'monster':37 'movi':221 'much':24 'mysteri':189 'mytholog':66 'often':5 'one':125,131 'origin':22,28,44,107,147,154,175,226 'part':54 'perfect':36 'piec':115,126 'plot':187 'pose':206 'precis':80 'prequel':15 'prometeus':95 'realli':19 'releas':30 'scari':57 'serious':210 'singular':132 'small':178 'somehow':223 'space':63,101,170 'star':180 'tell':103 'thread':211 'trek':181 'turn':191 'unknown':43 'us':104 'use':6 'viewer':69 'villain':190 'want':96 'wors':25,227 'xenomorph':139"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1697891340
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5012425"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804994 {#1717
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:54.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697804940 {#2462
date: 2023-10-20 14:29:00.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|