Symfony Profiler

{
    "@context": [
        "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
    ],
    "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost",
    "to": [
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
    ],
    "object": {
        "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.eco.br\/activities\/create\/287ea7f6-09e2-4d97-88b3-646ba311b101",
        "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.eco.br\/u\/marte",
        "@context": [
            "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
        ],
        "to": [
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
        ],
        "object": {
            "type": "Note",
            "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.eco.br\/comment\/13760681",
            "attributedTo": "https:\/\/lemmy.eco.br\/u\/marte",
            "to": [
                "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
            ],
            "cc": [
                "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost",
                "https:\/\/midwest.social\/u\/peoplebeproblems"
            ],
            "content": "<p>It\u2019s very important to give context on the diagnosis. Any psychiatric diagnosis is heavily tied to its historical context. Autism as a diagnosis was not the same in the 1970s with the first DSM as it was in 1994 with DSM-IV and we didn\u2019t talk about spectrum until 2013 with DSM-V. \u201cBack in our day we called that an engineer\u201d that\u2019s because some things that are listed as disordered were not a disorder back then.<\/p>\n<p>But yes, I get your point that while some would be put in institutions, others wouldn\u2019t be seen as disordered. I should have given it some thought before my comment.<\/p>\n<p>I think that some of my reluctance with OP is that not all autism in the past was the \u201cquirky engineer\u201d one, there were already people being severely abused for a condition that didn\u2019t even have a name yet.<\/p>\n",
            "inReplyTo": "https:\/\/midwest.social\/comment\/16845042",
            "mediaType": "text\/html",
            "source": {
                "content": "It's very important to give context on the diagnosis. Any psychiatric diagnosis is heavily tied to its historical context. Autism as a diagnosis was not the same in the 1970s with the first DSM as it was in 1994 with DSM-IV and we didn't talk about spectrum until 2013 with DSM-V. \"Back in our day we called that an engineer\" that's because some things that are listed as disordered were not a disorder back then. \n\nBut yes, I get your point that while some would be put in institutions, others wouldn't be seen as disordered. I should have given it some thought before my comment.\n\nI think that some of my reluctance with OP is that not all autism in the past was the \"quirky engineer\" one, there were already people being severely abused for a condition that didn't even have a name yet.",
                "mediaType": "text\/markdown"
            },
            "published": "2025-04-20T14:00:04.341582Z",
            "tag": [
                {
                    "href": "https:\/\/midwest.social\/u\/peoplebeproblems",
                    "name": "@peoplebeproblems@midwest.social",
                    "type": "Mention"
                }
            ],
            "distinguished": false,
            "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost",
            "attachment": []
        },
        "cc": [
            "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost",
            "https:\/\/midwest.social\/u\/peoplebeproblems"
        ],
        "tag": [
            {
                "href": "https:\/\/midwest.social\/u\/peoplebeproblems",
                "name": "@peoplebeproblems@midwest.social",
                "type": "Mention"
            }
        ],
        "type": "Create",
        "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost"
    },
    "cc": [
        "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/lemmyshitpost\/followers"
    ],
    "type": "Announce",
    "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/activities\/announce\/create\/dd9ae927-48a4-4cb6-97de-10af1fc821ae"
}

{"@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"actor":"https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"id":"https://lemmy.eco.br/activities/create/287ea7f6-09e2-4d97-88b3-646ba311b101","actor":"https://lemmy.eco.br/u/marte","@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"type":"Note","id":"https://lemmy.eco.br/comment/13760681","attributedTo":"https://lemmy.eco.br/u/marte","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost","https://midwest.social/u/peoplebeproblems"],"content":"<p>It’s very important to give context on the diagnosis. Any psychiatric diagnosis is heavily tied to its historical context. Autism as a diagnosis was not the same in the 1970s with the first DSM as it was in 1994 with DSM-IV and we didn’t talk about spectrum until 2013 with DSM-V. “Back in our day we called that an engineer” that’s because some things that are listed as disordered were not a disorder back then.</p>\n<p>But yes, I get your point that while some would be put in institutions, others wouldn’t be seen as disordered. I should have given it some thought before my comment.</p>\n<p>I think that some of my reluctance with OP is that not all autism in the past was the “quirky engineer” one, there were already people being severely abused for a condition that didn’t even have a name yet.</p>\n","inReplyTo":"https://midwest.social/comment/16845042","mediaType":"text/html","source":{"content":"It's very important to give context on the diagnosis. Any psychiatric diagnosis is heavily tied to its historical context. Autism as a diagnosis was not the same in the 1970s with the first DSM as it was in 1994 with DSM-IV and we didn't talk about spectrum until 2013 with DSM-V. \"Back in our day we called that an engineer\" that's because some things that are listed as disordered were not a disorder back then. \n\nBut yes, I get your point that while some would be put in institutions, others wouldn't be seen as disordered. I should have given it some thought before my comment.\n\nI think that some of my reluctance with OP is that not all autism in the past was the \"quirky engineer\" one, there were already people being severely abused for a condition that didn't even have a name yet.","mediaType":"text/markdown"},"published":"2025-04-20T14:00:04.341582Z","tag":[{"href":"https://midwest.social/u/peoplebeproblems","name":"@peoplebeproblems@midwest.social","type":"Mention"}],"distinguished":false,"audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost","attachment":[]},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost","https://midwest.social/u/peoplebeproblems"],"tag":[{"href":"https://midwest.social/u/peoplebeproblems","name":"@peoplebeproblems@midwest.social","type":"Mention"}],"type":"Create","audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost"},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyshitpost/followers"],"type":"Announce","id":"https://lemmy.world/activities/announce/create/dd9ae927-48a4-4cb6-97de-10af1fc821ae"}