POST https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/f/inbox

Messages

Ordered list of dispatched messages across all your buses

"App\Message\ActivityPub\Inbox\ActivityMessage"
Caller In SharedInboxController.php line
Bus messenger.bus.default
Message
App\Message\ActivityPub\Inbox\ActivityMessage {#353
  +payload: "{"@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"actor":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"id":"https://lemmy.ml/activities/update/7df2203b-3b09-460a-8b24-9bfa5c1f138e","actor":"https://lemmy.ml/u/Ferk","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"type":"Note","id":"https://lemmy.ml/comment/17417014","attributedTo":"https://lemmy.ml/u/Ferk","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","https://aussie.zone/u/pupbiru"],"content":"<p>I don’t think there are many distributions that are truly free, at least not in the eyes of the FSF. Fedora is not one of them.</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>but for what benefit? […] fedora is going to have off the shelf solutions</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Yes, but that’s my point: fedora is already fully featured… the work needed is trivial, to the point that directly using an installation of fedora by itself (along with tools like ansible) wouldn’t be very different from doing he same with EU OS… at that point you don’t need a whole new distro, just Fedora and maybe some trivial scripts.</p>\n<p>Imho, there would be more value if something actually novel was used, and new guides and howtos were created to simplify/clarify things that used to be hard. What would be a really bad use of our money would be to spend a lot of euros for something that is trivial to do and only helps filling the pockets of some corrupt politician’s friend. I mean, I’m not against a simple reskin, but then it should be a cheap one at least, not something that requires big budget.</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>well, the actual software and configuration i’d argue aren’t the important part - owning the infrastructure is the important part…</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>I repeat (the full sentence): “I guess we’ll have to see how much they customize it, but in my experience with previous attempts, I’m expecting just a re-skin, just Fedora with different theme”</p>\n<p>Maybe you have a different experience with government-managed distros, but there have been some attempts at that in my (european) country that were definitely not much more than a reskinned Ubuntu (and before that, Debian) from back in the day. They used Ubuntu <em>infrastructure</em>, Ubuntu repositories, and the only extra repo they added was not a mirror, but a place for the few packages that were actually responsible for the theming, reskining and defaults. They used metapackages that depend on upstream packages to control what was part of the default install, but nothing beyond that.</p>\n<p>Also, just to keep things grounded in the initial point: do you really think that Fedora / Red Hat would not benefit at all from it?</p>\n","inReplyTo":"https://aussie.zone/comment/15456901","mediaType":"text/html","source":{"content":"I don't think there are many distributions that are truly free, at least not in the eyes of the FSF. Fedora is not one of them.\n\n> but for what benefit? [...] fedora is going to have off the shelf solutions\n\nYes, but that's my point: fedora is already fully featured.. the work needed is trivial, to the point that directly using an installation of fedora by itself (along with tools like ansible) wouldn't be very different from doing he same with EU OS... at that point you don't need a whole new distro, just Fedora and maybe some trivial scripts.\n\nImho, there would be more value if something actually novel was used, and new guides and howtos were created to simplify/clarify things that used to be hard. What would be a really bad use of our money would be to spend a lot of euros for something that is trivial to do and only helps filling the pockets of some corrupt politician's friend. I mean, I'm not against a simple reskin, but then it should be a cheap one at least, not something that requires big budget.\n\n> well, the actual software and configuration i’d argue aren’t the important part - owning the infrastructure is the important part…\n\nI repeat (the full sentence): \"I guess we’ll have to see how much they customize it, but in my experience with previous attempts, I’m expecting just a re-skin, just Fedora with different theme\"\n\nMaybe you have a different experience with government-managed distros, but there have been some attempts at that in my (european) country that were definitely not much more than a reskinned Ubuntu (and before that, Debian) from back in the day. They used Ubuntu *infrastructure*, Ubuntu repositories, and the only extra repo they added was not a mirror, but a place for the few packages that were actually responsible for the theming, reskining and defaults. They used metapackages that depend on upstream packages to control what was part of the default install, but nothing beyond that.\n\nAlso, just to keep things grounded in the initial point: do you really think that Fedora / Red Hat would not benefit at all from it?","mediaType":"text/markdown"},"published":"2025-03-20T20:32:48.318238Z","updated":"2025-03-20T21:14:24.920227Z","tag":[{"href":"https://aussie.zone/u/pupbiru","name":"@pupbiru@aussie.zone","type":"Mention"}],"distinguished":false,"audience":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","attachment":[]},"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux","https://aussie.zone/u/pupbiru"],"tag":[{"href":"https://aussie.zone/u/pupbiru","name":"@pupbiru@aussie.zone","type":"Mention"}],"type":"Update","audience":"https://lemmy.ml/c/linux"},"cc":["https://lemmy.ml/c/linux/followers"],"type":"Announce","id":"https://lemmy.ml/activities/announce/update/ff3ef96a-06d8-4bad-8714-a8f4d3c074b0"}"
  +request: [
    "host" => "kbin.spritesserver.nl"
    "method" => "POST"
    "uri" => "/f/inbox"
    "client_ip" => "54.36.178.108"
  ]
  +headers: [
    "content-type" => [
      "application/activity+json"
    ]
    "host" => [
      "kbin.spritesserver.nl"
    ]
    "date" => [
      "Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:14:34 GMT"
    ]
    "digest" => [
      "SHA-256=uFhuO11XinNKob5lyuigUEUgZFdsavoZix8jAalihBM="
    ]
    "signature" => [
      "keyId="https://lemmy.ml/c/linux#main-key",algorithm="hs2019",headers="(request-target) content-type date digest host",signature="ZGf8vItOi5CHoavyJYZ0cBEI4ZWngzDf/ccw/fmxXV6c89rnEmXGNyLfSLQjyNppLbVSJzwo7AqH8lImtnYjlsZCEhUtTDBHv5b5jjd5gr9Rx5lu0MjbDmzNr55gWcVV3jxNAEjVmGqnTsP9x71tPtMT8ydAEswIueQ1AJHTbhk9G30xlWcQ8aOWf70XdiRiQTtUn1L1ovnH6GcaMlLEU6DZxSrhfh1e4bAM3TByTS5lyOd2Ob7ZP3M4g0D46cGns5/nfQscnX5JIc+z/Hvxyur/V5+xbYSfqGYf1/RAuno23HnVmRNDJdDqoPfC7VKQSRXnaXpG41gZPR8LKFrrMw==""
    ]
    "accept" => [
      "*/*"
    ]
    "user-agent" => [
      "Lemmy/0.19.10; +https://lemmy.ml"
    ]
    "accept-encoding" => [
      "gzip"
    ]
    "content-length" => [
      "5662"
    ]
    "x-php-ob-level" => [
      "1"
    ]
  ]
}
Envelope stamps when dispatching No items
Envelope stamps after dispatch
Symfony\Component\Messenger\Stamp\BusNameStamp {#343
  -busName: "messenger.bus.default"
}
Symfony\Component\Messenger\Stamp\SentStamp {#268
  -senderClass: "Symfony\Component\Messenger\Bridge\Doctrine\Transport\DoctrineTransport"
  -senderAlias: "async_ap"
}
Symfony\Component\Messenger\Stamp\TransportMessageIdStamp {#227
  -id: "52049122"
}