1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1583
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2454 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1715 …}
+slug: "I-need-someone-to-do-a-sanity-check-for-me"
+title: "I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks)"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don’t. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.\n
\n
My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.\n
\n
Edit: I think I’ll use i2p for dns
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 2
+favouriteCount: 8
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1707654196 {#1559
date: 2024-02-11 13:23:16.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1720 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1610}
]
-id: 24585
-titleTs: "'bridg':13 'check':8 'i2p':11 'need':2 'network':14 'saniti':7 'someon':3"
-bodyTs: "'0':59 '2':54 'break':38 'bridg':6,51 'control':15 'crazi':69 'creat':49 'dns':84 'dynam':33 'edit':76 'encrypt':64 'everi':39 'firewal':17 'good':74 'hop':60 'i2p':47,82 'ip':34 'leas':65 'll':80 'locat':9,13 'm':3 'normal':27 'often':41 'one':12 'physic':8 'place':55 'set':66 'solut':75 'think':78 'though':43 'togeth':10 'tri':4 'use':28,46,58,81 'wireguard':29 'would':26,37"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703516280
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.zip/post/7446695"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1707725561 {#1595
date: 2024-02-12 09:12:41.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703485280 {#1565
date: 2023-12-25 07:21:20.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1587 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: "Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side."
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 3
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1703488923 {#1434
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1581 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1652 …}
-id: 250482
-bodyTs: "'alway':19 'client':48 'client-sid':47 'correct':30 'date':29 'dns':6 'dynam':5,13,35 'endpoint':45 'ip':14,31,36 'option':46 'self':41 'set':43 'setup':3 'side':49 'site':9 'sue':21 'support':34 'use':38 'wireguard':32"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/comment/6232835"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703488923 {#1699
date: 2023-12-25 08:22:03.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 250482
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|