1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#2363
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2077 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2011 …}
+slug: "Non-computer-standing-furniture"
+title: "Non-computer standing furniture"
+url: null
+body: """
There is evidence that standing is better for the human body than sitting. For work we have standing desks for computer work and such. Some aim to stand 8+ hours a day.\n
\n
What about for other activities? How do the unemployed, retired, and homemarkers get in enough standing? Are there good ways to stand while reading a book, or sipping a coffee and enjoying the dawn?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 20
+favouriteCount: 45
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1726885455 {#2384
date: 2024-09-21 04:24:15.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2022 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2032 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2023 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1404 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1731}
]
-id: 30635
-titleTs: "'comput':3 'furnitur':5 'non':2 'non-comput':1 'stand':4"
-bodyTs: "'8':29 'activ':37 'aim':26 'better':7 'bodi':11 'book':58 'coffe':62 'comput':21 'dawn':66 'day':32 'desk':19 'enjoy':64 'enough':47 'evid':3 'get':45 'good':51 'homemark':44 'hour':30 'human':10 'read':56 'retir':42 'sip':60 'sit':13 'stand':5,18,28,48,54 'unemploy':41 'way':52 'work':15,22"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705409558
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://midwest.social/post/7545113"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705323158 {#2033
date: 2024-01-15 13:52:38.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+parent: null
+root: null
+body: """
When I was unemployed I used to walk waaaay more than I do now - both to get to places and just as a hobby - and I’d hope to do the same when retired, as long as I am fit enough. That’s walking though. Standing in one place is something that I find extremely wearing and have never done when not necessary. As I understand it this is fundamental to the nature of bipeds. To stand still, we constantly need to adjust balance. However, when walking, it is basically a continuous, controlled fall forwards, and takes less energy. For quadrupeds, it is the other way around: they are stable when standing, but require constant effort to walk or run.\n
\n
I probably spend most of my reading time horizontal rather than sitting, but if I am reading when vertical then, again, it will be walking - or pacing around - rather than standing. I would seem really weird to simply stand there and read.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1724052372 {#1692
date: 2024-08-19 09:26:12.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@MNByChoice@midwest.social"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2459 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2454 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
-id: 310731
-bodyTs: "'adjust':83 'around':107,148 'balanc':84 'basic':90 'bipe':75 'constant':80,115 'continu':92 'control':93 'd':27 'done':60 'effort':116 'energi':99 'enough':41 'extrem':55 'fall':94 'find':54 'fit':40 'forward':95 'fundament':70 'get':17 'hobbi':24 'hope':28 'horizont':129 'howev':85 'less':98 'long':36 'natur':73 'necessari':63 'need':81 'never':59 'one':48 'pace':147 'place':19,49 'probabl':122 'quadrup':101 'rather':130,149 'read':127,137,162 'realli':155 'requir':114 'retir':34 'run':120 'seem':154 'simpli':158 'sit':132 'someth':51 'spend':123 'stabl':110 'stand':46,77,112,151,159 'still':78 'take':97 'though':45 'time':128 'understand':66 'unemploy':4 'use':6 'vertic':139 'waaaay':9 'walk':8,44,87,118,145 'way':106 'wear':56 'weird':156 'would':153"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/comment/5883201"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705328379 {#1616
date: 2024-01-15 15:19:39.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 310731
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1698
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1582 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-Bronze-Age-village-on-Italian-island"
+title: "Ancient fortifications revealed underneath Bronze Age village on Italian island"
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-bronze-age-village-on-italian-island"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 16
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705332693 {#1635
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1650 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+children: []
-id: 30674
-titleTs: "'age':6 'ancient':1 'bronz':5 'fortif':2 'island':10 'italian':9 'reveal':3 'underneath':4 'villag':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705368693
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6742209"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705332693 {#1449
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1698
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1582 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-Bronze-Age-village-on-Italian-island"
+title: "Ancient fortifications revealed underneath Bronze Age village on Italian island"
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-bronze-age-village-on-italian-island"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 16
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705332693 {#1635
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1650 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+children: []
-id: 30674
-titleTs: "'age':6 'ancient':1 'bronz':5 'fortif':2 'island':10 'italian':9 'reveal':3 'underneath':4 'villag':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705368693
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6742209"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705332693 {#1449
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1698
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1582 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-Bronze-Age-village-on-Italian-island"
+title: "Ancient fortifications revealed underneath Bronze Age village on Italian island"
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/ancient-fortifications-revealed-underneath-bronze-age-village-on-italian-island"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 16
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705332693 {#1635
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1650 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
+children: []
-id: 30674
-titleTs: "'age':6 'ancient':1 'bronz':5 'fortif':2 'island':10 'italian':9 'reveal':3 'underneath':4 'villag':7"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705368693
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6742209"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705332693 {#1449
date: 2024-01-15 16:31:33.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1556
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1555 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Are-3-000-year-old-carvings-from-Italy-a-star-map-Researchers-can-t"
+title: "Are 3,000-year-old carvings from Italy a star map? Researchers can't agree."
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/are-3000-year-old-carvings-from-italy-a-star-map-researchers-cant-agree"
+body: """
A roughly 3,000-year-old stone disk covered with enigmatic markings is actually an ancient celestial map marking the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers claim.\n
\n
The tire-size stone, which was discovered near an ancient hill fort in northeastern Italy a few years ago, features 29 carved markings on its front and back that may represent the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers posit in a new study, published on Nov. 22 in the journal Astronomical Notes.\n
\n
However, astronomer Ed Krupp, the director of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, who was not involved in the stone’s discovery, told Live Science he thinks any relationship between the carved markings on the stone and the brightest stars may be accidental.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705353248 {#1559
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1557 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1558 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1619 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+children: []
-id: 30777
-titleTs: "'000':3 '3':2 'agre':16 'carv':7 'itali':9 'map':12 'old':6 'research':13 'star':11 'year':5 'year-old':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':4 '22':78 '29':51 '3':3 'accident':126 'actual':15 'ago':49 'ancient':17,40 'angel':96 'astronom':82,85 'back':58 'brightest':22,63,122 'carv':52,115 'celesti':18 'claim':29 'cover':10 'director':89 'discov':37 'discoveri':105 'disk':9 'ed':86 'enigmat':12 'featur':50 'fort':42 'front':56 'griffith':92 'hill':41 'howev':84 'involv':100 'itali':45 'journal':81 'krupp':87 'live':107 'los':95 'map':19 'mark':13,20,53,116 'may':60,124 'near':38 'new':73 'night':26,67 'northeastern':44 'note':83 'nov':77 'observatori':93 'old':7 'posit':70 'publish':75 'relationship':112 'repres':61 'research':28,69 'rough':2 'scienc':108 'size':33 'sky':27,68 'star':23,64,123 'stone':8,34,103,119 'studi':74 'think':110 'tire':32 'tire-s':31 'told':106 'year':6,48 'year-old':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705402748
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6752534"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705353248 {#1525
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1556
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1555 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Are-3-000-year-old-carvings-from-Italy-a-star-map-Researchers-can-t"
+title: "Are 3,000-year-old carvings from Italy a star map? Researchers can't agree."
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/are-3000-year-old-carvings-from-italy-a-star-map-researchers-cant-agree"
+body: """
A roughly 3,000-year-old stone disk covered with enigmatic markings is actually an ancient celestial map marking the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers claim.\n
\n
The tire-size stone, which was discovered near an ancient hill fort in northeastern Italy a few years ago, features 29 carved markings on its front and back that may represent the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers posit in a new study, published on Nov. 22 in the journal Astronomical Notes.\n
\n
However, astronomer Ed Krupp, the director of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, who was not involved in the stone’s discovery, told Live Science he thinks any relationship between the carved markings on the stone and the brightest stars may be accidental.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705353248 {#1559
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1557 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1558 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1619 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+children: []
-id: 30777
-titleTs: "'000':3 '3':2 'agre':16 'carv':7 'itali':9 'map':12 'old':6 'research':13 'star':11 'year':5 'year-old':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':4 '22':78 '29':51 '3':3 'accident':126 'actual':15 'ago':49 'ancient':17,40 'angel':96 'astronom':82,85 'back':58 'brightest':22,63,122 'carv':52,115 'celesti':18 'claim':29 'cover':10 'director':89 'discov':37 'discoveri':105 'disk':9 'ed':86 'enigmat':12 'featur':50 'fort':42 'front':56 'griffith':92 'hill':41 'howev':84 'involv':100 'itali':45 'journal':81 'krupp':87 'live':107 'los':95 'map':19 'mark':13,20,53,116 'may':60,124 'near':38 'new':73 'night':26,67 'northeastern':44 'note':83 'nov':77 'observatori':93 'old':7 'posit':70 'publish':75 'relationship':112 'repres':61 'research':28,69 'rough':2 'scienc':108 'size':33 'sky':27,68 'star':23,64,123 'stone':8,34,103,119 'studi':74 'think':110 'tire':32 'tire-s':31 'told':106 'year':6,48 'year-old':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705402748
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6752534"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705353248 {#1525
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1556
+user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1578 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1555 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1670 …}
+slug: "Are-3-000-year-old-carvings-from-Italy-a-star-map-Researchers-can-t"
+title: "Are 3,000-year-old carvings from Italy a star map? Researchers can't agree."
+url: "https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/are-3000-year-old-carvings-from-italy-a-star-map-researchers-cant-agree"
+body: """
A roughly 3,000-year-old stone disk covered with enigmatic markings is actually an ancient celestial map marking the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers claim.\n
\n
The tire-size stone, which was discovered near an ancient hill fort in northeastern Italy a few years ago, features 29 carved markings on its front and back that may represent the brightest stars in the night sky, researchers posit in a new study, published on Nov. 22 in the journal Astronomical Notes.\n
\n
However, astronomer Ed Krupp, the director of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, who was not involved in the stone’s discovery, told Live Science he thinks any relationship between the carved markings on the stone and the brightest stars may be accidental.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 22
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1705353248 {#1559
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1557 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1558 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1604 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1619 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1701 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1687 …}
+children: []
-id: 30777
-titleTs: "'000':3 '3':2 'agre':16 'carv':7 'itali':9 'map':12 'old':6 'research':13 'star':11 'year':5 'year-old':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':4 '22':78 '29':51 '3':3 'accident':126 'actual':15 'ago':49 'ancient':17,40 'angel':96 'astronom':82,85 'back':58 'brightest':22,63,122 'carv':52,115 'celesti':18 'claim':29 'cover':10 'director':89 'discov':37 'discoveri':105 'disk':9 'ed':86 'enigmat':12 'featur':50 'fort':42 'front':56 'griffith':92 'hill':41 'howev':84 'involv':100 'itali':45 'journal':81 'krupp':87 'live':107 'los':95 'map':19 'mark':13,20,53,116 'may':60,124 'near':38 'new':73 'night':26,67 'northeastern':44 'note':83 'nov':77 'observatori':93 'old':7 'posit':70 'publish':75 'relationship':112 'repres':61 'research':28,69 'rough':2 'scienc':108 'size':33 'sky':27,68 'star':23,64,123 'stone':8,34,103,119 'studi':74 'think':110 'tire':32 'tire-s':31 'told':106 'year':6,48 'year-old':5"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1705402748
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://feddit.uk/post/6752534"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1705353248 {#1525
date: 2024-01-15 22:14:08.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
17 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
18 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|