Symfony Profiler

{
    "@context": [
        "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
    ],
    "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
    "to": [
        "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
    ],
    "object": {
        "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.zip\/activities\/create\/f07c1aad-f171-466a-be80-7b5d552d72a4",
        "actor": "https:\/\/lemmy.zip\/u\/balderdash9",
        "@context": [
            "https:\/\/join-lemmy.org\/context.json",
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams"
        ],
        "to": [
            "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
        ],
        "object": {
            "type": "Note",
            "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.zip\/comment\/17908316",
            "attributedTo": "https:\/\/lemmy.zip\/u\/balderdash9",
            "to": [
                "https:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/activitystreams#Public"
            ],
            "cc": [
                "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
                "https:\/\/slrpnk.net\/u\/solo"
            ],
            "content": "<p>So your suggestion is that we can keep our moral judgments out of practical considerations without espousing the objective truth of moral facts? This would lead one to act <em>as though<\/em> they believed in objective moral truths. Which is fine! It would be like thinking numbers don\u2019t exist (perhaps because you don\u2019t believe non-physical\/abstract entities exist) but acting <em>as though<\/em> numbers exist because it is useful to do so. I don\u2019t hold that view, but I can see your perspective.<\/p>\n<p>The question of who defines morality is potentially a category error. We don\u2019t ask who defines descriptive facts about the world. The Earth is round, that is a fact, and its truth does not depend on anyone\u2019s opinion. It is our job to develop ways to figure out whether it is true. Similarly, there are normative facts about morality and aesthetics. Some things are morally or aesthetically good, and it is our job to determine the truth. Admittedly, we have had more success with descriptive facts than with normative facts.<\/p>\n",
            "inReplyTo": "https:\/\/slrpnk.net\/comment\/14964449",
            "mediaType": "text\/html",
            "source": {
                "content": "So your suggestion is that we can keep our moral judgments out of practical considerations without espousing the objective truth of moral facts? This would lead one to act *as though* they believed in objective moral truths. Which is fine! It would be like thinking numbers don't exist (perhaps because you don't believe non-physical\/abstract entities exist) but acting *as though* numbers exist because it is useful to do so. I don't hold that view, but I can see your perspective. \n\nThe question of who defines morality is potentially a category error. We don't ask who defines descriptive facts about the world. The Earth is round, that is a fact, and its truth does not depend on anyone's opinion. It is our job to develop ways to figure out whether it is true. Similarly, there are normative facts about morality and aesthetics. Some things are morally or aesthetically good, and it is our job to determine the truth. Admittedly, we have had more success with descriptive facts than with normative facts. ",
                "mediaType": "text\/markdown"
            },
            "published": "2025-04-08T15:10:48.835020Z",
            "tag": [
                {
                    "href": "https:\/\/slrpnk.net\/u\/solo",
                    "name": "@solo@slrpnk.net",
                    "type": "Mention"
                }
            ],
            "distinguished": false,
            "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
            "attachment": []
        },
        "cc": [
            "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy",
            "https:\/\/slrpnk.net\/u\/solo"
        ],
        "tag": [
            {
                "href": "https:\/\/slrpnk.net\/u\/solo",
                "name": "@solo@slrpnk.net",
                "type": "Mention"
            }
        ],
        "type": "Create",
        "audience": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy"
    },
    "cc": [
        "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/c\/asklemmy\/followers"
    ],
    "type": "Announce",
    "id": "https:\/\/lemmy.world\/activities\/announce\/create\/2774770c-b34e-439d-af43-6e7cbedfeb97"
}

{"@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"actor":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"id":"https://lemmy.zip/activities/create/f07c1aad-f171-466a-be80-7b5d552d72a4","actor":"https://lemmy.zip/u/balderdash9","@context":["https://join-lemmy.org/context.json","https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"],"to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"object":{"type":"Note","id":"https://lemmy.zip/comment/17908316","attributedTo":"https://lemmy.zip/u/balderdash9","to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","https://slrpnk.net/u/solo"],"content":"<p>So your suggestion is that we can keep our moral judgments out of practical considerations without espousing the objective truth of moral facts? This would lead one to act <em>as though</em> they believed in objective moral truths. Which is fine! It would be like thinking numbers don’t exist (perhaps because you don’t believe non-physical/abstract entities exist) but acting <em>as though</em> numbers exist because it is useful to do so. I don’t hold that view, but I can see your perspective.</p>\n<p>The question of who defines morality is potentially a category error. We don’t ask who defines descriptive facts about the world. The Earth is round, that is a fact, and its truth does not depend on anyone’s opinion. It is our job to develop ways to figure out whether it is true. Similarly, there are normative facts about morality and aesthetics. Some things are morally or aesthetically good, and it is our job to determine the truth. Admittedly, we have had more success with descriptive facts than with normative facts.</p>\n","inReplyTo":"https://slrpnk.net/comment/14964449","mediaType":"text/html","source":{"content":"So your suggestion is that we can keep our moral judgments out of practical considerations without espousing the objective truth of moral facts? This would lead one to act *as though* they believed in objective moral truths. Which is fine! It would be like thinking numbers don't exist (perhaps because you don't believe non-physical/abstract entities exist) but acting *as though* numbers exist because it is useful to do so. I don't hold that view, but I can see your perspective. \n\nThe question of who defines morality is potentially a category error. We don't ask who defines descriptive facts about the world. The Earth is round, that is a fact, and its truth does not depend on anyone's opinion. It is our job to develop ways to figure out whether it is true. Similarly, there are normative facts about morality and aesthetics. Some things are morally or aesthetically good, and it is our job to determine the truth. Admittedly, we have had more success with descriptive facts than with normative facts. ","mediaType":"text/markdown"},"published":"2025-04-08T15:10:48.835020Z","tag":[{"href":"https://slrpnk.net/u/solo","name":"@solo@slrpnk.net","type":"Mention"}],"distinguished":false,"audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","attachment":[]},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy","https://slrpnk.net/u/solo"],"tag":[{"href":"https://slrpnk.net/u/solo","name":"@solo@slrpnk.net","type":"Mention"}],"type":"Create","audience":"https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy"},"cc":["https://lemmy.world/c/asklemmy/followers"],"type":"Announce","id":"https://lemmy.world/activities/announce/create/2774770c-b34e-439d-af43-6e7cbedfeb97"}