1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2386 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2380 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2462 …}
+slug: "Privacy-advocate-challenges-YouTube-s-ad-blocking-detection"
+title: "Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection"
+url: "https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/"
+body: null
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 50
+favouriteCount: 336
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698628067 {#1701
date: 2023-10-30 02:07:47.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2456 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2452 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1648}
]
-id: 8089
-titleTs: "'ad':6 'advoc':2 'block':7 'challeng':3 'detect':8 'privaci':1 'youtub':4"
-bodyTs: null
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698535683
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2770448"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698449283 {#1641
date: 2023-10-28 01:28:03.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1571 …}
+body: """
It’s their choice, and I would simply not use YouTube. Access to YouTube specifically is not very concerning to me.\n
\n
But if they try to normalize this or even attempt to influence legislators that adblockers should be restricted in any way by law, then I would be concerned, and for this reason I think it’s important to articulate right now that there is nothing inherently wrong or unethical about using an adblocker.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 7
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1698499747 {#1709
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
"@cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1592 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1552 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1663 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1563 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
-id: 76369
-bodyTs: "'access':12 'adblock':36,74 'articul':60 'attempt':31 'choic':4 'concern':19,49 'even':30 'import':58 'influenc':33 'inher':67 'law':44 'legisl':34 'normal':27 'noth':66 'reason':53 'restrict':39 'right':61 'simpli':8 'specif':15 'think':55 'tri':25 'uneth':70 'use':10,72 'way':42 'would':7,47 'wrong':68 'youtub':11,14"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/1505487"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698499747 {#1614
date: 2023-10-28 15:29:07.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 76369
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|