1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1578
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2468 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1720 …}
+slug: "How-bad-is-TPM-on-a-laptop-for-privacy"
+title: "How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy?"
+url: null
+body: """
There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it’s not intended/capable of that, like [this answer](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828) for example (which is 5 years old though).\n
\n
Lemmy, what do you say?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 11
+favouriteCount: 35
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1700378272 {#1563
date: 2023-11-19 08:17:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1716 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1707 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1614}
]
-id: 13619
-titleTs: "'bad':2 'laptop':7 'privaci':9 'tpm':4"
-bodyTs: "'/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':33 '5':38 'answer':30 'connect':19 'data':9 'exampl':35 'intended/capable':25 'internet':18 'laptop':15 'lemmi':42 'like':28 'manufactur':11 'old':40 'other':20 'say':21,46 'security.stackexchange.com':32 'security.stackexchange.com/questions/187820/do-a-tpms-benefits-outweigh-the-risks#187828)':31 'send':8 'server':12 'specul':4 'though':41 'tpm':6 'uncontrol':7 'year':39"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1700238385
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/8341585"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151985 {#1696
date: 2023-11-16 17:26:25.0 +01:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1575 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1652 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1654 …}
+body: """
Microsoft Pluton is a kind of TPM with additional features:\n
\n
[…microsoft.com/…/microsoft-pluton-security-proces…](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)\n
\n
[microsoft.com/…/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process…](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)\n
\n
Funnily enough, they don’t advertise preventing users from opening unapproved media files as a feature. So that could either mean they’re sneaking it in, or that the image is not genuine.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 11
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1700154472 {#1435
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@wAkawAka@lemmy.world"
"@safefel556@sh.itjust.works"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1573 …}
-id: 130803
-bodyTs: "'/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':20 '/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':15 '/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-process':17 '/microsoft-pluton-security-proces':12 'addit':9 'advertis':26 'could':39 'either':40 'enough':22 'featur':10,36 'file':33 'funnili':21 'genuin':53 'imag':50 'kind':5 'learn.microsoft.com':14 'learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/pluton/microsoft-pluton-security-processor)':13 'mean':41 'media':32 'microsoft':1 'microsoft.com':11,16 'open':30 'pluton':2 'prevent':27 're':43 'sneak':44 'tpm':7 'unapprov':31 'user':28 'www.microsoft.com':19 'www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-microsoft-pluton-processor-the-security-chip-designed-for-the-future-of-windows-pcs/)':18"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.ca/comment/4920186"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421240 {#1438
date: 2023-11-19 20:14:00.0 +01:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154472 {#1431
date: 2023-11-16 18:07:52.0 +01:00
}
+"title": 130803
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|