1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2370
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2360 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2377 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "Many-prehistoric-handprints-show-a-finger-missing-What-if-this"
+title: "Many prehistoric handprints show a finger missing. What if this was not accidental?"
+url: "https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/dec/23/prehistoric-handprints-finger-missing-ritually-removed"
+body: """
Men and women might have had their fingers deliberately chopped off during religious rituals in prehistoric times, according to a new interpretation of palaeolithic cave art.\n
\n
In a paper presented at a recent meeting of the European Society for Human Evolution, researchers point to 25,000-year-old paintings in France and Spain that depict silhouettes of hands. On more than 200 of these prints, the hands lack at least one digit. In some cases, only a single upper segment is missing; in others, several fingers are gone.\n
\n
In the past, this absence of digits was attributed to artistic licence by the cave-painting creators or to ancient people’s real-life medical problems, including frostbite.\n
\n
But scientists led by archaeologist Prof Mark Collard of Simon Fraser University in Vancouver say the truth may be far more gruesome. “There is compelling evidence that these people may have had their fingers amputated deliberately in rituals intended to elicit help from supernatural entities,” said Collard.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 60
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1710971217 {#2455
date: 2024-03-20 22:46:57.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+children: []
-id: 24386
-titleTs: "'accident':13 'finger':6 'handprint':3 'mani':1 'miss':7 'prehistor':2 'show':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':46 '200':63 '25':45 'absenc':94 'accord':18 'amput':154 'ancient':110 'archaeologist':124 'art':26 'artist':100 'attribut':98 'case':76 'cave':25,105 'cave-paint':104 'chop':10 'collard':127,166 'compel':144 'creator':107 'deliber':9,155 'depict':56 'digit':73,96 'elicit':160 'entiti':164 'european':37 'evid':145 'evolut':41 'far':139 'finger':8,87,153 'franc':52 'fraser':130 'frostbit':119 'gone':89 'gruesom':141 'hand':59,68 'help':161 'human':40 'includ':118 'intend':158 'interpret':22 'lack':69 'least':71 'led':122 'licenc':101 'life':115 'mark':126 'may':137,149 'medic':116 'meet':34 'men':1 'might':4 'miss':83 'new':21 'old':49 'one':72 'other':85 'paint':50,106 'palaeolith':24 'paper':29 'past':92 'peopl':111,148 'point':43 'prehistor':16 'present':30 'print':66 'problem':117 'prof':125 'real':114 'real-lif':113 'recent':33 'religi':13 'research':42 'ritual':14,157 'said':165 'say':134 'scientist':121 'segment':81 'sever':86 'silhouett':57 'simon':129 'singl':79 'societi':38 'spain':54 'supernatur':163 'time':17 'truth':136 'univers':131 'upper':80 'vancouv':133 'women':3 'year':48 'year-old':47"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703497495
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9923256"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703411095 {#2452
date: 2023-12-24 10:44:55.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2370
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2360 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2377 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "Many-prehistoric-handprints-show-a-finger-missing-What-if-this"
+title: "Many prehistoric handprints show a finger missing. What if this was not accidental?"
+url: "https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/dec/23/prehistoric-handprints-finger-missing-ritually-removed"
+body: """
Men and women might have had their fingers deliberately chopped off during religious rituals in prehistoric times, according to a new interpretation of palaeolithic cave art.\n
\n
In a paper presented at a recent meeting of the European Society for Human Evolution, researchers point to 25,000-year-old paintings in France and Spain that depict silhouettes of hands. On more than 200 of these prints, the hands lack at least one digit. In some cases, only a single upper segment is missing; in others, several fingers are gone.\n
\n
In the past, this absence of digits was attributed to artistic licence by the cave-painting creators or to ancient people’s real-life medical problems, including frostbite.\n
\n
But scientists led by archaeologist Prof Mark Collard of Simon Fraser University in Vancouver say the truth may be far more gruesome. “There is compelling evidence that these people may have had their fingers amputated deliberately in rituals intended to elicit help from supernatural entities,” said Collard.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 60
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1710971217 {#2455
date: 2024-03-20 22:46:57.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+children: []
-id: 24386
-titleTs: "'accident':13 'finger':6 'handprint':3 'mani':1 'miss':7 'prehistor':2 'show':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':46 '200':63 '25':45 'absenc':94 'accord':18 'amput':154 'ancient':110 'archaeologist':124 'art':26 'artist':100 'attribut':98 'case':76 'cave':25,105 'cave-paint':104 'chop':10 'collard':127,166 'compel':144 'creator':107 'deliber':9,155 'depict':56 'digit':73,96 'elicit':160 'entiti':164 'european':37 'evid':145 'evolut':41 'far':139 'finger':8,87,153 'franc':52 'fraser':130 'frostbit':119 'gone':89 'gruesom':141 'hand':59,68 'help':161 'human':40 'includ':118 'intend':158 'interpret':22 'lack':69 'least':71 'led':122 'licenc':101 'life':115 'mark':126 'may':137,149 'medic':116 'meet':34 'men':1 'might':4 'miss':83 'new':21 'old':49 'one':72 'other':85 'paint':50,106 'palaeolith':24 'paper':29 'past':92 'peopl':111,148 'point':43 'prehistor':16 'present':30 'print':66 'problem':117 'prof':125 'real':114 'real-lif':113 'recent':33 'religi':13 'research':42 'ritual':14,157 'said':165 'say':134 'scientist':121 'segment':81 'sever':86 'silhouett':57 'simon':129 'singl':79 'societi':38 'spain':54 'supernatur':163 'time':17 'truth':136 'univers':131 'upper':80 'vancouv':133 'women':3 'year':48 'year-old':47"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703497495
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9923256"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703411095 {#2452
date: 2023-12-24 10:44:55.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2370
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2360 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2377 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2467 …}
+slug: "Many-prehistoric-handprints-show-a-finger-missing-What-if-this"
+title: "Many prehistoric handprints show a finger missing. What if this was not accidental?"
+url: "https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/dec/23/prehistoric-handprints-finger-missing-ritually-removed"
+body: """
Men and women might have had their fingers deliberately chopped off during religious rituals in prehistoric times, according to a new interpretation of palaeolithic cave art.\n
\n
In a paper presented at a recent meeting of the European Society for Human Evolution, researchers point to 25,000-year-old paintings in France and Spain that depict silhouettes of hands. On more than 200 of these prints, the hands lack at least one digit. In some cases, only a single upper segment is missing; in others, several fingers are gone.\n
\n
In the past, this absence of digits was attributed to artistic licence by the cave-painting creators or to ancient people’s real-life medical problems, including frostbite.\n
\n
But scientists led by archaeologist Prof Mark Collard of Simon Fraser University in Vancouver say the truth may be far more gruesome. “There is compelling evidence that these people may have had their fingers amputated deliberately in rituals intended to elicit help from supernatural entities,” said Collard.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 22
+favouriteCount: 60
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1710971217 {#2455
date: 2024-03-20 22:46:57.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2363 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2381 …}
+children: []
-id: 24386
-titleTs: "'accident':13 'finger':6 'handprint':3 'mani':1 'miss':7 'prehistor':2 'show':4"
-bodyTs: "'000':46 '200':63 '25':45 'absenc':94 'accord':18 'amput':154 'ancient':110 'archaeologist':124 'art':26 'artist':100 'attribut':98 'case':76 'cave':25,105 'cave-paint':104 'chop':10 'collard':127,166 'compel':144 'creator':107 'deliber':9,155 'depict':56 'digit':73,96 'elicit':160 'entiti':164 'european':37 'evid':145 'evolut':41 'far':139 'finger':8,87,153 'franc':52 'fraser':130 'frostbit':119 'gone':89 'gruesom':141 'hand':59,68 'help':161 'human':40 'includ':118 'intend':158 'interpret':22 'lack':69 'least':71 'led':122 'licenc':101 'life':115 'mark':126 'may':137,149 'medic':116 'meet':34 'men':1 'might':4 'miss':83 'new':21 'old':49 'one':72 'other':85 'paint':50,106 'palaeolith':24 'paper':29 'past':92 'peopl':111,148 'point':43 'prehistor':16 'present':30 'print':66 'problem':117 'prof':125 'real':114 'real-lif':113 'recent':33 'religi':13 'research':42 'ritual':14,157 'said':165 'say':134 'scientist':121 'segment':81 'sever':86 'silhouett':57 'simon':129 'singl':79 'societi':38 'spain':54 'supernatur':163 'time':17 'truth':136 'univers':131 'upper':80 'vancouv':133 'women':3 'year':48 'year-old':47"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1703497495
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9923256"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1703411095 {#2452
date: 2023-12-24 10:44:55.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1586
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1723 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1691 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1721 …}
+slug: "Flag-of-Suffolk-UK-An-armorial-banner-attributed-to-the"
+title: "Flag of Suffolk, UK. An armorial banner attributed to the canonised King Edmund of East Anglia, killed by vikings in 869. Adopted as the county flag in 2017."
+url: "http://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/flags/UK-Suffolk.png"
+body: "On a field of blue, the flag displays a yellow emblem of a crown and crossed arrows. This is the emblem attributed to St Edmund, king of East Anglia, shot with arrows and decapitated Vikings in 869. A shrine and cult later developed in Bury St Edmunds, and the emblem gradually came to represent the county as a whole."
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1689495404 {#1446
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1730 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+children: []
-id: 20299
-titleTs: "'2017':28 '869':21 'adopt':22 'anglia':16 'armori':6 'attribut':8 'banner':7 'canonis':11 'counti':25 'east':15 'edmund':13 'flag':1,26 'kill':17 'king':12 'suffolk':3 'uk':4 'vike':19"
-bodyTs: "'869':37 'anglia':29 'arrow':17,32 'attribut':22 'blue':5 'buri':45 'came':52 'counti':56 'cross':16 'crown':14 'cult':41 'decapit':34 'develop':43 'display':8 'east':28 'edmund':25,47 'emblem':11,21,50 'field':3 'flag':7 'gradual':51 'king':26 'later':42 'repres':54 'shot':30 'shrine':39 'st':24,46 'vike':35 'whole':59 'yellow':10"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1689495404
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/1567116"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689495404 {#1639
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1586
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1723 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1691 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1721 …}
+slug: "Flag-of-Suffolk-UK-An-armorial-banner-attributed-to-the"
+title: "Flag of Suffolk, UK. An armorial banner attributed to the canonised King Edmund of East Anglia, killed by vikings in 869. Adopted as the county flag in 2017."
+url: "http://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/flags/UK-Suffolk.png"
+body: "On a field of blue, the flag displays a yellow emblem of a crown and crossed arrows. This is the emblem attributed to St Edmund, king of East Anglia, shot with arrows and decapitated Vikings in 869. A shrine and cult later developed in Bury St Edmunds, and the emblem gradually came to represent the county as a whole."
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1689495404 {#1446
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1730 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+children: []
-id: 20299
-titleTs: "'2017':28 '869':21 'adopt':22 'anglia':16 'armori':6 'attribut':8 'banner':7 'canonis':11 'counti':25 'east':15 'edmund':13 'flag':1,26 'kill':17 'king':12 'suffolk':3 'uk':4 'vike':19"
-bodyTs: "'869':37 'anglia':29 'arrow':17,32 'attribut':22 'blue':5 'buri':45 'came':52 'counti':56 'cross':16 'crown':14 'cult':41 'decapit':34 'develop':43 'display':8 'east':28 'edmund':25,47 'emblem':11,21,50 'field':3 'flag':7 'gradual':51 'king':26 'later':42 'repres':54 'shot':30 'shrine':39 'st':24,46 'vike':35 'whole':59 'yellow':10"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1689495404
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/1567116"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689495404 {#1639
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1586
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1723 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1691 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1721 …}
+slug: "Flag-of-Suffolk-UK-An-armorial-banner-attributed-to-the"
+title: "Flag of Suffolk, UK. An armorial banner attributed to the canonised King Edmund of East Anglia, killed by vikings in 869. Adopted as the county flag in 2017."
+url: "http://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/flags/UK-Suffolk.png"
+body: "On a field of blue, the flag displays a yellow emblem of a crown and crossed arrows. This is the emblem attributed to St Edmund, king of East Anglia, shot with arrows and decapitated Vikings in 869. A shrine and cult later developed in Bury St Edmunds, and the emblem gradually came to represent the county as a whole."
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1689495404 {#1446
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1730 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+children: []
-id: 20299
-titleTs: "'2017':28 '869':21 'adopt':22 'anglia':16 'armori':6 'attribut':8 'banner':7 'canonis':11 'counti':25 'east':15 'edmund':13 'flag':1,26 'kill':17 'king':12 'suffolk':3 'uk':4 'vike':19"
-bodyTs: "'869':37 'anglia':29 'arrow':17,32 'attribut':22 'blue':5 'buri':45 'came':52 'counti':56 'cross':16 'crown':14 'cult':41 'decapit':34 'develop':43 'display':8 'east':28 'edmund':25,47 'emblem':11,21,50 'field':3 'flag':7 'gradual':51 'king':26 'later':42 'repres':54 'shot':30 'shrine':39 'st':24,46 'vike':35 'whole':59 'yellow':10"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1689495404
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/1567116"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689495404 {#1639
date: 2023-07-16 10:16:44.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|