GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/index.php/u/@Cube6392@beehaw.org/commented/2023-07-15::2023-07-15

Response
200 OK
IP
216.73.216.136
Profiled on
Token
2b8b8a

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 19.37 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.09 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
  +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
  +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
    \n
    Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
    \n
    Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
    \n
    Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 27
  +favouriteCount: 89
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
    date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
        \n
        There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
        date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
      -id: 18749
      -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
        date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18749
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 4
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
        "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
      -id: 18820
      -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18820
    }
  ]
  -id: 1311
  -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
  -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1689538094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
  +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
  +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
    \n
    Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
    \n
    Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
    \n
    Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 27
  +favouriteCount: 89
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
    date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
        \n
        There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
        date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
      -id: 18749
      -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
        date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18749
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 4
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
        "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
      -id: 18820
      -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18820
    }
  ]
  -id: 1311
  -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
  -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1689538094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
  +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
  +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
    \n
    Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
    \n
    Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
    \n
    Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 27
  +favouriteCount: 89
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
    date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
        \n
        There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
        date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
      -id: 18749
      -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
        date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18749
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 4
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
        "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
      -id: 18820
      -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
        date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 18820
    }
  ]
  -id: 1311
  -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
  -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1689538094
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
    date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
        +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 4
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
          "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
          "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
        -id: 18820
        -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18820
      }
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
    \n
    There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
  -id: 18749
  -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
    date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18749
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
        +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 4
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
          "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
          "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
        -id: 18820
        -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18820
      }
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
    \n
    There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
  -id: 18749
  -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
    date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18749
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
        +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 4
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
          "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
          "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
        -id: 18820
        -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
          date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18820
      }
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
    \n
    There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
    date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
  -id: 18749
  -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
    date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18749
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
9 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
10 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
          \n
          There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
          date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
        -id: 18749
        -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
          date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18749
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
  +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 4
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
    "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
    "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  -id: 18820
  -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18820
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
11 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
          \n
          There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
          date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
        -id: 18749
        -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
          date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18749
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
  +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 4
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
    "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
    "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  -id: 18820
  -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18820
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
12 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1716 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2379 …}
    +slug: "Do-you-think-Federated-networks-are-the-future-or-do"
    +title: "Do you think Federated networks are the future or do you think Peer to Peer networks are the future? Which do you think is better?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      Alright so I’m not an expert so I might not be explaining it correctly.\n
      \n
      Federated Network: Multiple instances sharing content, such as Lemmy\n
      \n
      Peer to Peer Network: There is no “instances”, just peers. Many peers sharing content. Every user is a peer. There is no server costs, because every device connected to the network is acting like a mini-server. It will cost your device some storage space and network bandwith depending on the how the software is designed.\n
      \n
      Or do you think Centralized servers are still gonna dominate the future?
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 27
    +favouriteCount: 89
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1689534250 {#2458
      date: 2023-07-16 21:04:10.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2378 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1361 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1382 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2033 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1585 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          P2P social networks have a moderation problem. Individual users are all their own moderators, which works like the “block” feature on Lemmy and KBin. However, this can get super exhausting so fast. There’s only so much fascist, homophobic, or transphobic bullshit a person can tolerate in an online interaction before they just give up and leave the network because it feels like there’s nothing worthwhile there.\n
          \n
          There may be a solution to this problem someday, but for now, you have a choice for P2P networks. You can give up on user discovery entirely, as in Secure Scuttlebutt, where your network grows as you get invited to follow people or invite people to follow you. Alternatively, you can give up on moderation entirely, as with Nostr. I think either are fatally flawed presently, making federated services the best choice for having good control over your social networking experience without having to do every single part of it yourself.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1689465823 {#1698
          date: 2023-07-16 02:03:43.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1548 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1591 …}
        -id: 18749
        -bodyTs: "'altern':117 'best':139 'block':19 'bullshit':42 'choic':84,140 'control':144 'discoveri':94 'either':130 'entir':95,124 'everi':154 'exhaust':30 'experi':149 'fascist':38 'fast':32 'fatal':132 'featur':20 'feder':136 'feel':62 'flaw':133 'follow':109,115 'get':28,106 'give':54,90,120 'good':143 'grow':103 'homophob':39 'howev':25 'individu':8 'interact':50 'invit':107,112 'kbin':24 'leav':57 'lemmi':22 'like':17,63 'make':135 'may':70 'moder':6,14,123 'much':37 'network':3,59,87,102,148 'nostr':127 'noth':66 'onlin':49 'p2p':1,86 'part':156 'peopl':110,113 'person':44 'present':134 'problem':7,76 'scuttlebutt':99 'secur':98 'servic':137 'singl':155 'social':2,147 'solut':73 'someday':77 'super':29 'think':129 'toler':46 'transphob':41 'user':9,93 'without':150 'work':16 'worthwhil':67"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/674646"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689454229 {#1609
          date: 2023-07-15 22:50:29.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 18749
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
    ]
    -id: 1311
    -titleTs: "'better':25 'feder':4 'futur':8,19 'network':5,16 'peer':13,15 'think':3,12,23"
    -bodyTs: "'act':57 'alright':1 'bandwith':73 'central':86 'connect':52 'content':21,38 'correct':15 'cost':48,65 'depend':74 'design':81 'devic':51,67 'domin':91 'everi':39,50 'expert':7 'explain':13 'feder':16 'futur':93 'gonna':90 'instanc':19,32 'lemmi':24 'like':58 'm':4 'mani':35 'might':10 'mini':61 'mini-serv':60 'multipl':18 'network':17,28,55,72 'peer':25,27,34,36,43 'server':47,62,87 'share':20,37 'softwar':79 'space':70 'still':89 'storag':69 'think':85 'user':40"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1689538094
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/732590"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451730 {#1645
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:50.0 +02:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689451694 {#2455
      date: 2023-07-15 22:08:14.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1525 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1723 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1640}
  +body: "I think ultimately something like that will be the solution. And maybe it will just be that you can subscribe to any other user’s block list, and perhaps they can in turn subscribe to yours, and basically within your peer 2 peer network the block list(s) are federated. You could potentially even have a block and whitelist where when someone you think shouldn’t get blocked gets blocked you personally white list them, and in the case of conflicting block and whitelists, a consensus based confidence list is created where some users just don’t show in your feed if enough percentage of your block list follows block them vs whitelist them, and users near 50% show in your feed in a collapsed “controversial” mode"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 4
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1689457566 {#1662
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com"
    "@Cube6392@beehaw.org"
    "@TauZero@mander.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1597 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1618 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1626 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1629 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1598 …}
  -id: 18820
  -bodyTs: "'2':42 '50':118 'base':87 'basic':38 'block':26,46,57,68,70,82,107,110 'case':79 'collaps':125 'confid':88 'conflict':81 'consensus':86 'controversi':126 'could':52 'creat':91 'enough':103 'even':54 'feder':50 'feed':101,122 'follow':109 'get':67,69 'like':5 'list':27,47,74,89,108 'mayb':12 'mode':127 'near':117 'network':44 'peer':41,43 'percentag':104 'perhap':29 'person':72 'potenti':53 'shouldn':65 'show':98,119 'solut':10 'someon':62 'someth':4 'subscrib':20,34 'think':2,64 'turn':33 'ultim':3 'user':24,94,116 'vs':112 'white':73 'whitelist':59,84,113 'within':39"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://beehaw.org/comment/675185"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1689457566 {#1557
    date: 2023-07-15 23:46:06.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 18820
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
13 DENIED ROLE_ADMIN 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
14 DENIED ROLE_MODERATOR 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details