2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1433
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1552 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1674 …}
+slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
+title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
\n
I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
\n
- Cable A \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
- Cable B \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
- Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
- Cable C \n
- Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
\n
**So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 10
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1642
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1676 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1673 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+children: []
-id: 2212
-titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
-bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1694728728
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1633
date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1634
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
} |
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1433
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1552 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1674 …}
+slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
+title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
\n
I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
\n
- Cable A \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
- Cable B \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
- Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
- Cable C \n
- Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
\n
**So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 10
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1642
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1676 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1673 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+children: []
-id: 2212
-titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
-bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1694728728
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1633
date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1634
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
} |
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1433
+user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1552 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1674 …}
+slug: "How-do-I-interpret-USB-PD2-0-vs-PD3-0-PPS-max"
+title: "How do I interpret USB PD2.0 vs PD3.0 PPS (max wattage)?"
+url: null
+body: """
So I’m doing some testing of USB-C cables using a tester and a constant load (I’ll have another post soon with some questions on this). But before running each test, I’m checking the E-mark chip and then enumerating the charge capabilities of each to see what they report being capable of.\n
\n
I’ll use 3 different brands of cables as samples of my question. Power Supply (PS) 1 is an Anker 100W with PPS support. PS2 is a MacBook Pro 94W brick with no PPS support.\n
\n
- Cable A \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
- Cable B \n
- Emark: 20V@5A USB3.2 Gen 2\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 100W\n
- Max PD using PS2: Not tested\n
- Cable C \n
- Emark: 50V@5A USB2.0\n
- Max PD using PS1: PD3.0 PPS 29W\n
- Max PD using PS2: PD2.0 94W\n
\n
**So the question: What would be limiting Cables A and C to PPS 29W?**
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 10
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1694706228 {#1642
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1676 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1673 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1669 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
+children: []
-id: 2212
-titleTs: "'interpret':4 'max':10 'pd2.0':6 'pd3.0':8 'pps':9 'usb':5 'vs':7 'wattag':11"
-bodyTs: "'1':75 '100w':79,129 '2':101,122 '20v':97,118 '29w':108,148,168 '3':62 '50v':139 '5a':98,119,140 '94w':88,114,154 'anker':78 'anoth':22 'b':116 'brand':64 'brick':89 'c':10,137,165 'cabl':11,66,94,115,136,162 'capabl':48,57 'charg':47 'check':37 'chip':42 'constant':17 'differ':63 'e':40 'e-mark':39 'emark':96,117,138 'enumer':45 'gen':100,121 'limit':161 'll':20,60 'load':18 'm':3,36 'macbook':86 'mark':41 'max':102,109,123,130,142,149 'pd':103,110,124,131,143,150 'pd2.0':113,153 'pd3.0':106,127,146 'post':23 'power':72 'pps':81,92,107,128,147,167 'pro':87 'ps':74 'ps1':105,126,145 'ps2':83,112,133,152 'question':27,71,157 'report':55 'run':32 'sampl':68 'see':52 'soon':24 'suppli':73 'support':82,93 'test':6,34,135 'tester':14 'usb':9 'usb-c':8 'usb2.0':141 'usb3.2':99,120 'use':12,61,104,111,125,132,144,151 'would':159"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1694728728
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nowsci.com/post/1010636"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694708980 {#1633
date: 2023-09-14 18:29:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1694706228 {#1634
date: 2023-09-14 17:43:48.0 +02:00
}
} |