GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/index.php/u/@demesisx@infosec.pub/active/2023-11-16::2023-11-16

Response
200 OK
IP
216.73.216.90
Profiled on
Token
380a7c

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 0.81 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.04 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
  +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
  +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
  +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
  +body: """
    > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
    \n
    > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
    \n
    > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
    \n
    Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
    """
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 117
  +favouriteCount: 225
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
    date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
  +children: [
    6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
          \n
          ---\n
          \n
          [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
          \n
          A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
          \n
          B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
          \n
          both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
          \n
          !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 82
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
          date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
        -id: 130491
        -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
          date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
          date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130491
      }
      +body: """
        > What does Monera do?\n
        \n
        it is a crypto currency that:\n
        \n
        > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
        \n
        IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
        \n
        Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 20
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
      -id: 130635
      -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
        date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130635
    }
    5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      -id: 130792
      -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
        date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130792
    }
    4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
        \n
        have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
        \n
        > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
        \n
        I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 21
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
      -id: 130910
      -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130910
    }
    3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
      -id: 130987
      -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
        date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130987
    }
    2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
        \n
        Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
        \n
        More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
      -id: 131646
      -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131646
    }
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
        \n
        What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
      -id: 131756
      -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131756
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  ]
  -id: 13589
  -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
  -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700233024
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
    date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
    date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
  +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
  +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
  +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
  +body: """
    > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
    \n
    > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
    \n
    > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
    \n
    Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
    """
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 117
  +favouriteCount: 225
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
    date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
  +children: [
    6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
          \n
          ---\n
          \n
          [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
          \n
          A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
          \n
          B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
          \n
          both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
          \n
          !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 82
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
          date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
        -id: 130491
        -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
          date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
          date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130491
      }
      +body: """
        > What does Monera do?\n
        \n
        it is a crypto currency that:\n
        \n
        > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
        \n
        IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
        \n
        Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 20
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
      -id: 130635
      -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
        date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130635
    }
    5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      -id: 130792
      -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
        date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130792
    }
    4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
        \n
        have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
        \n
        > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
        \n
        I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 21
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
      -id: 130910
      -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130910
    }
    3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
      -id: 130987
      -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
        date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130987
    }
    2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
        \n
        Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
        \n
        More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
      -id: 131646
      -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131646
    }
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
        \n
        What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
      -id: 131756
      -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131756
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  ]
  -id: 13589
  -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
  -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700233024
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
    date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
    date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
  +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
  +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
  +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
  +body: """
    > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
    \n
    > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
    \n
    > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
    \n
    Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
    """
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 117
  +favouriteCount: 225
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
    date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
  +children: [
    6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
          \n
          ---\n
          \n
          [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
          \n
          A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
          \n
          B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
          \n
          both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
          \n
          !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 82
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
          date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
        -id: 130491
        -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
          date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
          date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130491
      }
      +body: """
        > What does Monera do?\n
        \n
        it is a crypto currency that:\n
        \n
        > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
        \n
        IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
        \n
        Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 20
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
      -id: 130635
      -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
        date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
        date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130635
    }
    5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
      -id: 130792
      -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
        date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
        date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130792
    }
    4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
        \n
        have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
        \n
        > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
        \n
        I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 21
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
      -id: 130910
      -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
        date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130910
    }
    3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 12
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
      -id: 130987
      -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
        date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
        date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 130987
    }
    2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
        \n
        Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
        \n
        More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
      -id: 131646
      -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
        date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131646
    }
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
      +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
      +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
      +body: """
        It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
        \n
        What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 7
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
        "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
        "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        "@LWD@lemm.ee"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
      -id: 131756
      -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
        date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
      }
      +"title": 131756
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  ]
  -id: 13589
  -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
  -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1700233024
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
    date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
    date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > What does Monera do?\n
    \n
    it is a crypto currency that:\n
    \n
    > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
    \n
    IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
    \n
    Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
  -id: 130635
  -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
    date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130635
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > What does Monera do?\n
    \n
    it is a crypto currency that:\n
    \n
    > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
    \n
    IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
    \n
    Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
  -id: 130635
  -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
    date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130635
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555}
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > What does Monera do?\n
    \n
    it is a crypto currency that:\n
    \n
    > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
    \n
    IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
    \n
    Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 20
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
  -id: 130635
  -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
    date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
    date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130635
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
9 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
10 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616}
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  -id: 130792
  -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
    date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130792
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
11 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616}
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  -id: 130792
  -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
    date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130792
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
12 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616}
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
  -id: 130792
  -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
    date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
    date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130792
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
13 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
14 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722}
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
    \n
    have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
    \n
    > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
    \n
    I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 21
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
  -id: 130910
  -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130910
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
15 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722}
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
    \n
    have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
    \n
    > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
    \n
    I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 21
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
  -id: 130910
  -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130910
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
16 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722}
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
    \n
    have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
    \n
    > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
    \n
    I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 21
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
  -id: 130910
  -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
    date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130910
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
17 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
18 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716}
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
  -id: 130987
  -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
    date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130987
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
19 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716}
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
  -id: 130987
  -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
    date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130987
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
20 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716}
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 12
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
  -id: 130987
  -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
    date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
    date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130987
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
21 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
22 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456}
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
    \n
    Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
    \n
    More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  -id: 131646
  -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131646
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
23 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456}
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
    \n
    Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
    \n
    More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  -id: 131646
  -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131646
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
24 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456}
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
    \n
    Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
    \n
    More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
  -id: 131646
  -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
    date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131646
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
25 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
26 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
    \n
    What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
  -id: 131756
  -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131756
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
27 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
    \n
    What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
  -id: 131756
  -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131756
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
28 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
          +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
          +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
          +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
          +image: null
          +parent: null
          +root: null
          +body: """
            I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
            \n
            ---\n
            \n
            [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
            \n
            A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
            \n
            B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
            \n
            both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
            \n
            !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
            """
          +lang: "en"
          +isAdult: false
          +favouriteCount: 82
          +score: 0
          +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
            date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
          }
          +ip: null
          +tags: null
          +mentions: [
            "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          ]
          +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
          +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
          +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
          +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
          +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
          +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
          -id: 130491
          -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
          +ranking: 0
          +commentCount: 0
          +upVotes: 0
          +downVotes: 0
          +visibility: "visible             "
          +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
          +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
            date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
          }
          +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
            date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
          }
          +"title": 130491
        }
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
  +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
  +body: """
    It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
    \n
    What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 7
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
    "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
    "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
    "@LWD@lemm.ee"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
  -id: 131756
  -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
    date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 131756
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
29 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
30 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
    \n
    ---\n
    \n
    [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
    \n
    A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
    \n
    B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
    \n
    both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
    \n
    !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 82
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
    date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
  -id: 130491
  -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
    date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
    date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130491
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
31 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
    \n
    ---\n
    \n
    [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
    \n
    A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
    \n
    B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
    \n
    both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
    \n
    !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 82
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
    date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
  -id: 130491
  -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
    date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
    date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130491
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
32 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676
  +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#2010 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2001 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2362 …}
    +slug: "Proton-Mail-CEO-Calls-New-Address-Verification-Feature-Blockchain-in"
    +title: "Proton Mail CEO Calls New Address Verification Feature 'Blockchain in a Very Pure Form'"
    +url: "https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/11/16/141213/proton-mail-ceo-calls-new-address-verification-feature-blockchain-in-a-very-pure-form"
    +body: """
      > Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn’t “some sketchy cryptocurrency” linked to an “exit scam.” A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is “blockchain in a very pure form,” and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who’s claiming it.\n
      \n
      > Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient’s public key – a long string of letters and numbers – which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. “Maybe it’s the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I’m somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key,” he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a “man-in-the-middle attack,” like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.\n
      \n
      > Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can’t be altered. Yen realized that putting users’ public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them – and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. “In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging,” Yen said.\n
      \n
      Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don’t think I’m going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.
      """
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 117
    +favouriteCount: 225
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1721385980 {#2139
      date: 2024-07-19 12:46:20.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2376 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2373 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1980 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2501 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2497 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2514 …}
    +children: [
      6 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1555
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1726 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > What does Monera do?\n
          \n
          it is a crypto currency that:\n
          \n
          > Monero uses three different privacy technologies: ring signatures, ring confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. These hide the sender, amount, and receiver in the transaction, respectively. All transactions on the network are private by mandate; there is no way to accidentally send a transparent transaction. This feature is exclusive to Monero. You do not need to trust anyone else with your privacy.\n
          \n
          IMO, as a software engineer, leveraging the network effect of Moner**o** was a wise choice. In decentralized systems, the network effect (the amount of unique, separate nodes on a network) is directly correlated to the security of that network. If I were to transact with you in a public place (like a mall food court), you could correlate the presence of other parties in the food court as unique nodes in a network. The more eyes you have witnessing you transaction, the more intrinsic security that transaction has.\n
          \n
          Another concept that actually comes into play in cryptocurrency-based systems is that the intrinsic value of that token directly relates to the security of the data in its network. That could be another reason that they chose Moner**o**. Since it already has stable value, it offers a pre-existing and stable security solution.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 20
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700151032 {#1553
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1721 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1625 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1599 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1628 …}
        -id: 130635
        -bodyTs: "'accident':51 'actual':165 'address':25 'alreadi':205 'amount':30,96 'anoth':162,196 'anyon':68 'base':172 'choic':88 'chose':200 'come':166 'concept':163 'confidenti':20 'correl':106,131 'could':130,194 'court':128,140 'crypto':8 'cryptocurr':171 'cryptocurrency-bas':170 'currenc':9 'data':189 'decentr':90 'differ':14 'direct':105,182 'effect':81,94 'els':69 'engin':77 'exclus':59 'exist':214 'eye':149 'featur':57 'food':127,139 'hide':27 'imo':73 'intrins':157,177 'leverag':78 'like':124 'mall':126 'mandat':45 'moner':83,201 'monera':3 'monero':11,61 'need':65 'network':41,80,93,103,112,146,192 'node':100,143 'o':84,202 'offer':210 'parti':136 'place':123 'play':168 'pre':213 'pre-exist':212 'presenc':133 'privaci':15,72 'privat':43 'public':122 'reason':197 'receiv':32 'relat':183 'respect':36 'ring':17,19 'ringct':22 'secur':109,158,186,217 'send':52 'sender':29 'separ':99 'signatur':18 'sinc':203 'softwar':76 'solut':218 'stabl':207,216 'stealth':24 'system':91,173 'technolog':16 'three':13 'token':181 'transact':21,35,38,55,117,154,160 'transpar':54 'trust':67 'uniqu':98,142 'use':12 'valu':178,208 'way':49 'wise':87 'wit':152"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4290104"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700417403 {#1621
          date: 2023-11-19 19:10:03.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700151032 {#1620
          date: 2023-11-16 17:10:32.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130635
      }
      5 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1616
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1711 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "Thanks for lazily puking a couple of reductive, bankster-funded, cherry-picked, neolib rage-bait videos at me. Did you want to discuss this issue or do you want to lazily let the videos do it for you while forcing me to write essays that will be brigaded by the hivemind?"
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700154287 {#1630
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1705 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1692 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1686 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1680 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
        -id: 130792
        -bodyTs: "'bait':18 'bankster':10 'bankster-fund':9 'brigad':51 'cherri':13 'cherry-pick':12 'coupl':6 'discuss':26 'essay':47 'forc':43 'fund':11 'hivemind':54 'issu':28 'lazili':3,34 'let':35 'neolib':15 'pick':14 'puke':4 'rage':17 'rage-bait':16 'reduct':8 'thank':1 'video':19,37 'want':24,32 'write':46"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4291531"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700421845 {#1598
          date: 2023-11-19 20:24:05.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700154287 {#1611
          date: 2023-11-16 18:04:47.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130792
      }
      4 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1722
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1728 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > I have yet to see a software system that is better at preventing voter fraud than humans looking at your government-issued ID at a poll site and humans overseeing other humans manually counting votes.\n
          \n
          have you seen any of the [research](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434614/) that the US government did on it? Homomorphic encryption enables votes to be both public and obfuscated at the same time. I don’t want to write an essay right now but are you truly up to date on this?\n
          \n
          > Our current system is by far not a perfect one but removing the ability for governments to i.e. freeze accounts of bad actors is not a boon.\n
          \n
          I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. It should be exactly as hard as it is to freeze the cash of bad actors. That’s the point of it. I, of course, happen to be a libertarian socialist/anarcho syndicalist. You happen to be a capitalist. You seem to want be in the camp of “you will own nothing and you will like it” but I just so happen to not trust governments and their decisions. I believe in socialism but have seen it co-opted and destroyed by corruption. Anyway, I don’t think that those same clearly corrupted governments should have the unilateral right to prevent me from attemtpting to claw enough back from their corruption and greed to feed my family.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 21
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700156422 {#1596
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1732 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1735 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1729 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1719 …}
        -id: 130910
        -bodyTs: "'/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':46 'abil':100 'account':106 'actor':109,132 'anyway':200 'attemtpt':220 'back':224 'bad':108,131 'believ':186 'better':11 'boon':113 'camp':162 'capitalist':154 'cash':129 'claw':222 'clear':208 'co':194 'co-opt':193 'complet':115 'corrupt':199,209,227 'count':35 'cours':141 'current':88 'date':84 'decis':184 'destroy':197 'disagre':116 'enabl':56 'encrypt':55 'enough':223 'essay':75 'exact':120 'famili':233 'far':92 'feed':231 'fraud':15 'freez':105,127 'govern':22,50,102,181,210 'government-issu':21 'greed':229 'happen':142,150,177 'hard':122 'homomorph':54 'human':17,30,33 'i.e':104 'id':24 'issu':23 'libertarian':146 'like':171 'look':18 'manual':34 'noth':167 'obfusc':63 'one':96 'opt':195 'overse':31 'perfect':95 'point':136 'poll':27 'prevent':13,217 'public':61 'remov':98 'research':43 'right':76,215 'see':5 'seem':156 'seen':39,191 'site':28 'social':188 'socialist/anarcho':147 'softwar':7 'syndicalist':148 'system':8,89 'think':204 'time':67 'truli':81 'trust':180 'unilater':214 'us':49 'vote':36,57 'voter':14 'want':71,158 'write':73 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov':45 'www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8434614/)':44 'yet':3"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292253"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700156422 {#1604
          date: 2023-11-16 18:40:22.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130910
      }
      3 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1716
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1717 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: "I could be wrong (since article is paywalled) but as a DApp dev, Proton probably has a wallet with enough Monero to run this smart contract without anyone needing to add any money at all. So you wouldn’t be getting a Monero wallet in it. It would simply mint an NFT that you could then refer back to for verification that this is the same address that I say it is. It would simply leverage the monero chain every time an account was created and mint that as a unique ID (NFT!)."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 12
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700157882 {#1714
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@cheese_greater@lemmy.world"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1739 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1740 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2465 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2463 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2422 …}
        -id: 130987
        -bodyTs: "'account':83 'add':31 'address':67 'anyon':28 'articl':6 'back':58 'chain':79 'contract':26 'could':2,55 'creat':85 'dapp':12 'dev':13 'enough':20 'everi':80 'get':41 'id':92 'leverag':76 'mint':50,87 'monero':21,43,78 'money':33 'need':29 'nft':52,93 'paywal':8 'probabl':15 'proton':14 'refer':57 'run':23 'say':70 'simpli':49,75 'sinc':5 'smart':25 'time':81 'uniqu':91 'verif':61 'wallet':18,44 'without':27 'would':48,74 'wouldn':38 'wrong':4"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4292742"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700424954 {#1718
          date: 2023-11-19 21:15:54.0 +01:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700157882 {#1720
          date: 2023-11-16 19:04:42.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 130987
      }
      2 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2456
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2460 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          > If you dislike corruption and capitalists, then why do you like cryptocurrency?\n
          \n
          Because properly-implemented cryptocurrencies make corruption impossible. Even the shitty, scammy FTX project had a decentralized ledger, allowing the FTC to quickly and easily forensically untangle SBF’s tangled web of lies and fraud. Even Do Kwan’s TerraLuna hack would have been possible to detect had the project been open source (like any viable crypto project) but regardless of that, it will still now be quite trivial for the regulators prosecuting him and his co-conspirators with fraud.\n
          \n
          More learning for those listening in that haven’t already made up their mind like you have: [youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy](https://youtu.be/J5xegDJphvc?si=x3tJw9s1c1WL_WNy)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700171740 {#2458
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2453 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2469 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2471 …}
        -id: 131646
        -bodyTs: "'/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':113 'allow':31 'alreadi':103 'capitalist':6 'co':90 'co-conspir':89 'conspir':91 'corrupt':4,19 'crypto':69 'cryptocurr':12,17 'decentr':29 'detect':59 'dislik':3 'easili':37 'even':21,48 'forens':38 'fraud':47,93 'ftc':33 'ftx':25 'hack':53 'haven':101 'implement':16 'imposs':20 'kwan':50 'learn':95 'ledger':30 'lie':45 'like':11,66,108 'listen':98 'made':104 'make':18 'mind':107 'open':64 'possibl':57 'project':26,62,70 'proper':15 'properly-impl':14 'prosecut':85 'quick':35 'quit':80 'regardless':72 'regul':84 'sbf':40 'scammi':24 'shitti':23 'sourc':65 'still':77 'tangl':42 'terraluna':52 'trivial':81 'untangl':39 'viabl':68 'web':43 'would':54 'youtu.be':112 'youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny](https://youtu.be/j5xegdjphvc?si=x3tjw9s1c1wl_wny)':111"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4297912"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700171740 {#2461
          date: 2023-11-16 22:55:40.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131646
      }
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#2377
        +user: App\Entity\User {#265 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1551 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#2360 …}
        +root: App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
        +body: """
          It’s interesting that you can identify cherry-picking on my part but fail to identify it on your own. I merely mentioned situations where fraud (which I didn’t fall for because I follow certain principles about transparency and auditability of the crypto technologies that I prefer) was easily detected because the nature of the technology puts all transactions on an immutable ledger.\n
          \n
          What valid criticisms of THE TECH have you offered so far? You’ve simply pointed to situations where stupid people failed to protect themselves from clear frauds then went and used that brush to paint the entire crypto space. You’re not really the intellectual heavyweight you seem to think you are.
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 7
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1700174407 {#2363
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
          "@demesisx@infosec.pub"
          "@Atemu@lemmy.ml"
          "@LWD@lemm.ee"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2380 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2382 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2384 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2379 …}
        -id: 131756
        -bodyTs: "'audit':42 'brush':98 'certain':37 'cherri':9 'cherry-pick':8 'clear':91 'critic':68 'crypto':45,103 'detect':52 'didn':30 'easili':51 'entir':102 'fail':15,86 'fall':32 'far':76 'follow':36 'fraud':27,92 'heavyweight':111 'identifi':7,17 'immut':64 'intellectu':110 'interest':3 'ledger':65 'mention':24 'mere':23 'natur':55 'offer':74 'paint':100 'part':13 'peopl':85 'pick':10 'point':80 'prefer':49 'principl':38 'protect':88 'put':59 're':106 'realli':108 'seem':113 'simpli':79 'situat':25,82 'space':104 'stupid':84 'tech':71 'technolog':46,58 'think':115 'transact':61 'transpar':40 'use':96 'valid':67 've':78 'went':94"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4299676"
        +editedAt: null
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700174407 {#2370
          date: 2023-11-16 23:40:07.0 +01:00
        }
        +"title": 131756
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1676}
    ]
    -id: 13589
    -titleTs: "'address':6 'blockchain':9 'call':4 'ceo':3 'featur':8 'form':14 'mail':2 'new':5 'proton':1 'pure':13 'verif':7"
    -bodyTs: "'actual':101,172,276 'ad':73 'address':28,100 'allow':23,87 'alter':258 'although':45 'andi':40 'anyon':314 'attack':223 'bank':230 'basi':346 'behind':54 'belong':102,173,277 'blockchain':16,50,79,243,268 'case':352 'ceo':37 'claim':108 'clear':43 'communic':122 'could':349 'creat':185,270 'cross':284 'cross-referenc':283 'crypto':55 'cryptocurr':62 'cryptographi':71 'curious':312 'data':200,250 'day':343,345 'day-to-day':342 'decrypt':156 'email':8,27,99,136,290 'encrypt':117,134,199 'end':114,116 'end-to-end':113 'ensur':96,124,167,273 'enter':252 'envelop':242 'everi':98 'exit':66 'fake':187 'featur':48,77,319,337 'first':13 'focus':7 'folk':354 'foray':14 'form':84,120 'fortun':36,207 'founder':39 'get':233 'go':332 'handl':355 'immut':246 'inform':132,357 'initi':251 'intend':127,139,176 'interview':34 'isn':58 'issu':94,163 'key':19,52,56,143,161,171,189,204,265,275 'known':215 'lead':4 'ledger':247 'letter':148 'like':224,320,338 'link':63,190 'long':145 'm':195,331 'made':42 'mail':2,111 'make':11 'man':219 'man-in-the-middl':218 'mayb':178 'mean':248 'middl':222 'neat':324 'need':300,306,335 'new':47,76 'nsa':182 'number':150,237 'onto':253 'open':228 'order':292 'person':105 'platform':89 'postal':226 'privaci':6 'privacy-focus':5 'privat':160 'proton':1,110 'public':142,170,188,203,264,303 'pure':83 'put':262 'read':130 'realiz':260 'recipi':128,140,153,177 'record':272 'referenc':285 'report':31 'reseal':240 'said':165,311 'scam':67 'secur':119,210,236 'see':350 'send':289 'sender':133 'sensit':356 'servic':9 'sketchi':61 'social':235 'solv':91 'somehow':196 'sound':323 'space':211 'statement':231 'string':146 'student':69 'tactic':213 'technolog':17,53 'think':329 'thorni':93 'though':347 'told':206 'transpar':20,57 'trick':197 'trust':298 'unchang':309 'use':49,112,137,317,351 'user':24,263,288 'verif':295 'verifi':26 'whenev':286 'worker':227 'would':269,281,316 'yen':41,72,164,259,310"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1700233024
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://sopuli.xyz/post/5919305"
    +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700416423 {#1640
      date: 2023-11-19 18:53:43.0 +01:00
    }
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700146624 {#2214
      date: 2023-11-16 15:57:04.0 +01:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1550 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I’d absolutely use this. I’m glad to see people using this incredibly powerful concept to solve problems that would literally be impossible to solve without it. *It is especially encouraging that they used Monero since it has an extra layer of untraceability built-in.* Blockchain is experiencing kind of a backlash in public perception, but like tech closely related to it like NFT’s, it is a VERY viable idea that just so happens to be tainted by greed and disinformation.\n
    \n
    ---\n
    \n
    [Voting](infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting) is another concept that would become unhackable overnight…but would also probably:\n
    \n
    A. enable the creation of a CBDC (which would also allow the state to REVOKE ownership of your own money)\n
    \n
    B. force a state to pick a technology/crypto of choice (and tip the scales toward that crypto)\n
    \n
    both of which I somehow am vehemently against yet moderate a (ghosty) community on blockchain voting. 😅\n
    \n
    !blockchainvoting@infosec.pub
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 82
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1700626386 {#1696
    date: 2023-11-22 05:13:06.0 +01:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1567 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1561 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1528 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1589 …}
  -id: 130491
  -bodyTs: "'/c/blockchainvoting)':88 'absolut':3 'allow':111 'also':99,110 'anoth':90 'b':121 'backlash':54 'becom':94 'blockchain':48,152 'blockchainvoting@infosec.pub':154 'built':46 'built-in':45 'cbdc':107 'choic':130 'close':61 'communiti':150 'concept':16,91 'creation':104 'crypto':137 'd':2 'disinform':84 'enabl':102 'encourag':32 'especi':31 'experienc':50 'extra':41 'forc':122 'ghosti':149 'glad':8 'greed':82 'happen':77 'idea':73 'imposs':24 'incred':14 'infosec.pub':87 'infosec.pub/c/blockchainvoting)':86 'kind':51 'layer':42 'like':59,65 'liter':22 'm':7 'moder':147 'monero':36 'money':120 'nft':66 'overnight':96 'ownership':116 'peopl':11 'percept':57 'pick':126 'power':15 'probabl':100 'problem':19 'public':56 'relat':62 'revok':115 'scale':134 'see':10 'sinc':37 'solv':18,26 'somehow':142 'state':113,124 'taint':80 'tech':60 'technology/crypto':128 'tip':132 'toward':135 'unhack':95 'untrac':44 'use':4,12,35 'vehement':144 'viabl':72 'vote':85,153 'without':27 'would':21,93,98,109 'yet':146"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://infosec.pub/comment/4289116"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700418293 {#1606
    date: 2023-11-19 19:24:53.0 +01:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1700148264 {#1610
    date: 2023-11-16 16:24:24.0 +01:00
  }
  +"title": 130491
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
33 DENIED ROLE_ADMIN 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
34 DENIED ROLE_MODERATOR 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details