1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577 …2}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609
+user: App\Entity\User {#261 …}
+entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1577
+user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1617 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#1563 …}
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2372 …}
+slug: "Simplifying-warrant-canaries-Purplix-canary"
+title: "Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary"
+url: "https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/d7df6f62-2b4f-4a1d-8b9b-2ed7a398f31a.png"
+body: """
Github: [github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io](https://github.com/WardPearce/Purplix.io)\n
\n
View our canary: [purplix.io/…/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwL…](https://purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3ZjhTlZRWv8iqa6sn9yJ3TRiIkVbwITOOlwLjJD36jQ)\n
\n
What is Purplix Canary?\n
-----------------------\n
\n
Purplix Canary is a free & open source warrant canary tool what helps you to build trust with your users.\n
\n
It allows you to inform users cryptographically if your site has been compromised, seized or raided by anyone.\n
\n
### How does it work?\n
\n
#### Site verification\n
\n
Purplix uses DNS records to verify the domain the canary is for, giving your users confidence they are trusting the right people.\n
\n
#### Canary signatures\n
\n
Each domain is associated with a unique key pair. The private key is generated locally and securely stored within the owner’s keychain. When a user visits a canary from a specific domain for the first time, their private key is used to sign the public key. This signed version of the public key is then automatically employed for subsequent visits, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring the trustworthiness of canary statements from the respective domain.\n
\n
#### Files\n
\n
Canaries can include signed documents to help users further understand a situation.\n
\n
#### Notifications\n
\n
Users are automatically notified on the event of a new statement being published.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

"""
+type: "image"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: true
+commentCount: 18
+favouriteCount: 85
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1696901314 {#1732
date: 2023-10-10 03:28:34.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2364 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2359 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2470 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2393 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2387 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1403 …}
+children: [
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1609}
]
-id: 3570
-titleTs: "'canari':3,5 'purplix':4 'simplifi':1 'warrant':2"
-bodyTs: "'/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwl':9 '/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':12 '/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':199 '/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':193 '/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':196 '/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':4 'allow':37 'anyon':53 'associ':87 'attack':152 'automat':140,180 'build':31 'canari':7,16,18,25,69,82,112,158,165 'compromis':48 'confid':75 'cryptograph':42 'dns':62 'document':169 'domain':67,85,116,163 'effect':145 'employ':141 'ensur':154 'event':184 'file':164 'first':119 'free':21 'generat':97 'github':1 'github.com':3 'github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io](https://github.com/wardpearce/purplix.io)':2 'give':72 'help':28,171 'includ':167 'inform':40 'key':91,95,123,130,137 'keychain':106 'lemmy.nz':192,195,198 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/c0162d33-83c7-4824-ab1c-fbf57972887d.png)':197 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dcf1257b-b26c-4526-8586-e64cdd80e87e.png)':191 'lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/dd1ce480-90ab-46cb-bc66-cf0167dcff83.png)':194 'local':98 'man':148 'man-in-the-middl':147 'middl':151 'mitig':146 'new':187 'notif':177 'notifi':181 'open':22 'owner':104 'pair':92 'peopl':81 'privat':94,122 'public':129,136 'publish':190 'purplix':15,17,60 'purplix.io':8,11 'purplix.io/c/purplix.io/3zjhtlzrwv8iqa6sn9yj3triikvbwitoolwljjd36jq)':10 'raid':51 'record':63 'respect':162 'right':80 'secur':100 'seiz':49 'sign':127,132,168 'signatur':83 'site':45,58 'situat':176 'sourc':23 'specif':115 'statement':159,188 'store':101 'subsequ':143 'time':120 'tool':26 'trust':32,78 'trustworthi':156 'understand':174 'uniqu':90 'use':61,125 'user':35,41,74,109,172,178 'verif':59 'verifi':65 'version':133 'view':5 'visit':110,144 'warrant':24 'within':102 'work':57"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1696847965
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2235407"
+editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761700 {#1610
date: 2023-10-08 12:41:40.0 +02:00
}
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696761565 {#1714
date: 2023-10-08 12:39:25.0 +02:00
}
+__isInitialized__: true
…2
}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1586 …}
+image: null
+parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1649 …}
+root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1655 …}
+body: """
What do you mean by a failed warrant canary? In most cases there is no clear failure because there’s no clear plan in place to maintain them.\n
\n
For example, if a website has a statement “we have received 0 warrants”. When was that published? Yesterday? A year ago? More? Even if it has a date, say 6 months ago. What does that mean? That they only update it every year? Or maybe there were meant to update it they just forgot, maybe they aren’t allowed to update it due to a gag order.\n
\n
Due to the way each website does things differently with no clear guidelines, there isn’t actually a defined failure case.
"""
+lang: "en"
+isAdult: false
+favouriteCount: 0
+score: 0
+lastActive: DateTime @1696867833 {#1431
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+tags: null
+mentions: [
"@Ward@lemmy.nz"
"@stifle867@programming.dev"
"@CameronDev@programming.dev"
]
+children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1654 …}
+nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1679 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1668 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1666 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1576 …}
-id: 38914
-bodyTs: "'0':40 '6':58 'actual':112 'ago':49,60 'allow':87 'aren':85 'canari':9 'case':12,116 'clear':16,22,107 'date':56 'defin':114 'differ':104 'due':91,96 'even':51 'everi':70 'exampl':30 'fail':7 'failur':17,115 'forgot':82 'gag':94 'guidelin':108 'isn':110 'maintain':27 'mayb':73,83 'mean':4,64 'meant':76 'month':59 'order':95 'place':25 'plan':23 'publish':45 'receiv':39 'say':57 'statement':36 'thing':103 'updat':68,78,89 'warrant':8,41 'way':99 'websit':33,101 'year':48,71 'yesterday':46"
+ranking: 0
+commentCount: 0
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://programming.dev/comment/3720379"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1696867833 {#1694
date: 2023-10-09 18:10:33.0 +02:00
}
+"title": 38914
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_ADMIN
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_MODERATOR
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|