GET https://kbin.spritesserver.nl/index.php/u/@roguetrick@kbin.social/top/2023-10-18::2023-10-18

Response
200 OK
IP
216.73.216.21
Profiled on
Token
60742f

Security

Token

There is no security token.

Firewall

main Name
Security enabled
Stateless

Configuration

Key Value
provider security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider
context main
entry_point App\Security\KbinAuthenticator
user_checker App\Security\UserChecker
access_denied_handler (none)
access_denied_url (none)
authenticators 
[
  "two_factor"
  "remember_me"
  "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator"
  "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator"
]

Listeners

Listener Duration Response 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -httpPort: 80
  -httpsPort: 443
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …}
  -sessionKey: "_security_main"
  -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …}
  -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …}
  -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
  -registered: false
  -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …}
  -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …}
}
 1.20 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584
  -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582
  -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …}
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …}
}
 0.05 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …}
  -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none) 
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786
  -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …}
  -options: [
    "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token"
    "csrf_token_id" => "logout"
    "logout_path" => "app_logout"
  ]
  -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …}
  -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …}
  -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …}
}
 0.00 ms (none)

Authenticators

No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.

Access Decision

affirmative Strategy
# Voter class
1 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\AuthenticatedVoter"
2 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
3 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
4 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\ExpressionVoter"
5 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
6 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
7 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
8 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
9 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
10 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
11 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
12 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
13 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
14 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"

Access decision log

# Result Attributes Object
1 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
2 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
  +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
  +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
    \n
    I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 86
  +favouriteCount: 315
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
    date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 5
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
        date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
      -id: 56088
      -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
        date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56088
    }
  ]
  -id: 6140
  -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
  -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697694394
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
    date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
3 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
  +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
  +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
    \n
    I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 86
  +favouriteCount: 315
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
    date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 5
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
        date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
      -id: 56088
      -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
        date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56088
    }
  ]
  -id: 6140
  -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
  -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697694394
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
    date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
4 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
  +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
  +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
  +url: null
  +body: """
    I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
    \n
    I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
    """
  +type: "article"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 86
  +favouriteCount: 315
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
    date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
  +children: [
    App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 5
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
        date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
      -id: 56088
      -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
      +editedAt: null
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
        date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56088
    }
  ]
  -id: 6140
  -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
  -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697694394
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
    date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
5 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
6 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
    +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
    +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
      \n
      I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 86
    +favouriteCount: 315
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
      date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612}
    ]
    -id: 6140
    -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
    -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697694394
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
      date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 5
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
    date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
  -id: 56088
  -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
    date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56088
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
7 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
    +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
    +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
      \n
      I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 86
    +favouriteCount: 315
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
      date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612}
    ]
    -id: 6140
    -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
    -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697694394
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
      date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 5
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
    date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
  -id: 56088
  -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
    date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56088
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
8 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1584
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1740 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
    +image: null
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2060 …}
    +slug: "What-can-we-do-as-lemmy-users-to-fight-fake"
    +title: "What can we do, as lemmy users, to fight fake news being pushed in the platform?"
    +url: null
    +body: """
      I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.\n
      \n
      I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.
      """
    +type: "article"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 86
    +favouriteCount: 315
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1697724189 {#2332
      date: 2023-10-19 16:03:09.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2164 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2333 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2324 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2334 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2341 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2337 …}
    +children: [
      App\Entity\EntryComment {#1612}
    ]
    -id: 6140
    -titleTs: "'fake':10 'fight':9 'lemmi':6 'news':11 'platform':16 'push':13 'user':7"
    -bodyTs: "'cannot':20 'come':21 'communiti':12 'conclost':25 'disturb':61 'easili':56 'fact':48 'fake':30 'feed':59 'investig':16 'kind':51 'late':7 'lemmi':35 'lot':4 'love':37 'main':8 'news':11,31 'platform':39 'popul':57 'post':6,53 'propaganda':33 'purpos':27 'see':2,43 'sourc':18 'spread':28 'thrive':45 'want':41 'world':10"
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697694394
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/6962633"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697607994 {#1384
      date: 2023-10-18 07:46:34.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1576 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: "That's a moderation problem. We don't have a highly moderated news community that's popular yet."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 5
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697615162 {#1429
    date: 2023-10-18 09:46:02.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@YourEmptyWallet@lemmy.world"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1585 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1586 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1575 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1572 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1568 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1653 …}
  -id: 56088
  -bodyTs: "'communiti':14 'high':11 'moder':4,12 'news':13 'popular':17 'problem':5 'yet':18"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/548792/-/comment/3025974"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697611569 {#1693
    date: 2023-10-18 08:46:09.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56088
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
9 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
10 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
  +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
  +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
  +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
  +body: null
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 97
  +favouriteCount: 337
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
    date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
      +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 6
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        "@smeg@feddit.uk"
        "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      -id: 56803
      -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
        date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56803
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
        \n
        Edit:\n
        \n
        > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
        >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
        >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
        >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
        >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
        >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
        >  35  \n
        >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
        >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
        >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
        >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
        >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
        \n
        > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
        >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
        >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
        >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
        >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
        >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
        >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
        \n
        > 38  \n
        >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
        >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
        >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
        >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
        >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
        >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
        >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
        >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
        \n
        In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
        \n
        [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 8
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
        date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
      -id: 56739
      -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
        date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
        date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56739
    }
  ]
  -id: 6174
  -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
  -bodyTs: null
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697718064
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
    date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
11 DENIED edit 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
  +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
  +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
  +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
  +body: null
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 97
  +favouriteCount: 337
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
    date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
      +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 6
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        "@smeg@feddit.uk"
        "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      -id: 56803
      -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
        date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56803
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
        \n
        Edit:\n
        \n
        > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
        >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
        >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
        >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
        >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
        >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
        >  35  \n
        >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
        >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
        >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
        >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
        >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
        \n
        > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
        >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
        >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
        >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
        >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
        >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
        >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
        \n
        > 38  \n
        >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
        >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
        >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
        >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
        >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
        >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
        >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
        >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
        \n
        In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
        \n
        [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 8
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
        date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
      -id: 56739
      -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
        date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
        date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56739
    }
  ]
  -id: 6174
  -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
  -bodyTs: null
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697718064
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
    date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
12 DENIED moderate 
Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
  +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
  +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
  +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
  +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
  +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
  +body: null
  +type: "link"
  +lang: "en"
  +isOc: false
  +hasEmbed: false
  +commentCount: 97
  +favouriteCount: 337
  +score: 0
  +isAdult: false
  +sticky: false
  +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
    date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +adaAmount: 0
  +tags: null
  +mentions: null
  +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
  +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
  +children: [
    1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
      +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
      +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 6
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        "@smeg@feddit.uk"
        "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
      -id: 56803
      -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
        date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
        date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56803
    }
    0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
      +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
      +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
      +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
      +image: null
      +parent: null
      +root: null
      +body: """
        I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
        \n
        Edit:\n
        \n
        > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
        >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
        >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
        >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
        >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
        >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
        >  35  \n
        >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
        >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
        >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
        >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
        >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
        \n
        > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
        >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
        >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
        >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
        >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
        >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
        >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
        \n
        > 38  \n
        >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
        >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
        >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
        >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
        >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
        >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
        >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
        >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
        \n
        In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
        \n
        [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
        """
      +lang: "en"
      +isAdult: false
      +favouriteCount: 8
      +score: 0
      +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
        date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
      }
      +ip: null
      +tags: null
      +mentions: [
        "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
      ]
      +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
      +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
      +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
      +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
      +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
      +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
      -id: 56739
      -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
      +ranking: 0
      +commentCount: 0
      +upVotes: 0
      +downVotes: 0
      +visibility: "visible             "
      +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
      +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
        date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
      }
      +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
        date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
      }
      +"title": 56739
    }
  ]
  -id: 6174
  -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
  -bodyTs: null
  +cross: false
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +ranking: 1697718064
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
  +editedAt: null
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
    date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
  }
  +__isInitialized__: true
   …2
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
13 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
14 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
          \n
          Edit:\n
          \n
          > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
          >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
          >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
          >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
          >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
          >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
          >  35  \n
          >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
          >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
          >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
          >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
          >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
          \n
          > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
          >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
          >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
          >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
          >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
          >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
          >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
          \n
          > 38  \n
          >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
          >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
          >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
          >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
          >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
          >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
          >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
          >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
          \n
          In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
          \n
          [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 8
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
          date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
        -id: 56739
        -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
          date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
          date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56739
      }
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
  +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 6
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
    "@smeg@feddit.uk"
    "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  -id: 56803
  -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
    date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56803
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
15 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
          \n
          Edit:\n
          \n
          > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
          >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
          >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
          >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
          >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
          >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
          >  35  \n
          >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
          >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
          >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
          >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
          >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
          \n
          > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
          >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
          >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
          >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
          >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
          >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
          >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
          \n
          > 38  \n
          >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
          >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
          >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
          >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
          >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
          >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
          >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
          >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
          \n
          In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
          \n
          [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 8
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
          date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
        -id: 56739
        -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
          date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
          date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56739
      }
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
  +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 6
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
    "@smeg@feddit.uk"
    "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  -id: 56803
  -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
    date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56803
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
16 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702}
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: null
        +root: null
        +body: """
          I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
          \n
          Edit:\n
          \n
          > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
          >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
          >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
          >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
          >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
          >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
          >  35  \n
          >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
          >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
          >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
          >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
          >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
          \n
          > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
          >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
          >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
          >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
          >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
          >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
          >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
          \n
          > 38  \n
          >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
          >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
          >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
          >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
          >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
          >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
          >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
          >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
          \n
          In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
          \n
          [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
          """
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 8
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
          date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
        -id: 56739
        -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
          date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
          date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56739
      }
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
  +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
  +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 6
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
    "@smeg@feddit.uk"
    "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
  -id: 56803
  -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
    date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
    date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56803
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
17 DENIED ROLE_USER 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
18 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
        +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
        +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 6
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
          "@smeg@feddit.uk"
          "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        -id: 56803
        -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
          date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56803
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559}
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
    \n
    Edit:\n
    \n
    > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
    >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
    >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
    >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
    >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
    >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
    >  35  \n
    >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
    >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
    >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
    >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
    >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
    \n
    > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
    >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
    >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
    >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
    >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
    >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
    >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
    \n
    > 38  \n
    >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
    >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
    >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
    >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
    >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
    >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
    >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
    >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
    \n
    In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
    \n
    [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 8
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
    date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
  -id: 56739
  -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
    date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
    date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56739
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
19 DENIED edit 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
        +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
        +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 6
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
          "@smeg@feddit.uk"
          "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        -id: 56803
        -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
          date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56803
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559}
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
    \n
    Edit:\n
    \n
    > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
    >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
    >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
    >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
    >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
    >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
    >  35  \n
    >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
    >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
    >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
    >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
    >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
    \n
    > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
    >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
    >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
    >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
    >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
    >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
    >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
    \n
    > 38  \n
    >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
    >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
    >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
    >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
    >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
    >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
    >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
    >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
    \n
    In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
    \n
    [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 8
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
    date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
  -id: 56739
  -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
    date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
    date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56739
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
20 DENIED moderate 
App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559
  +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
  +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525
    +user: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\User {#1724 …}
    +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
    +image: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Image {#2018 …}
    +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2097 …}
    +slug: "Google-forced-to-reveal-users-search-histories-in-Colorado-court"
    +title: "Google forced to reveal users' search histories in Colorado court ruling"
    +url: "https://www.techspot.com/news/100529-google-forced-reveal-users-search-queries-colorado-court.html"
    +body: null
    +type: "link"
    +lang: "en"
    +isOc: false
    +hasEmbed: false
    +commentCount: 97
    +favouriteCount: 337
    +score: 0
    +isAdult: false
    +sticky: false
    +lastActive: DateTime @1698232365 {#1611
      date: 2023-10-25 13:12:45.0 +02:00
    }
    +ip: null
    +adaAmount: 0
    +tags: null
    +mentions: null
    +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2076 …}
    +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2084 …}
    +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2075 …}
    +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2132 …}
    +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2130 …}
    +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2042 …}
    +children: [
      1 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1702
        +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …}
        +entry: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Entry {#1525 …2}
        +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
        +image: null
        +parent: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1727 …}
        +root: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\EntryComment {#1732 …}
        +body: "Opposite actually. The court decision says that all future reverse keyword search warrants in Colorado will have their evidence thrown out. This one, however, didn't have precedent so the police acted in good faith."
        +lang: "en"
        +isAdult: false
        +favouriteCount: 6
        +score: 0
        +lastActive: DateTime @1697635893 {#1604
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +ip: null
        +tags: null
        +mentions: [
          "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
          "@smeg@feddit.uk"
          "@yeather@lemmy.ca"
        ]
        +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1737 …}
        +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1736 …}
        +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1726 …}
        +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1722 …}
        +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1725 …}
        +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1617 …}
        -id: 56803
        -bodyTs: "'act':32 'actual':2 'colorado':15 'court':4 'decis':5 'didn':25 'evid':19 'faith':35 'futur':9 'good':34 'howev':24 'keyword':11 'one':23 'opposit':1 'polic':31 'preced':28 'revers':10 'say':6 'search':12 'thrown':20 'warrant':13"
        +ranking: 0
        +commentCount: 0
        +upVotes: 0
        +downVotes: 0
        +visibility: "visible             "
        +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030779"
        +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635959 {#1596
          date: 2023-10-18 15:32:39.0 +02:00
        }
        +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635893 {#1619
          date: 2023-10-18 15:31:33.0 +02:00
        }
        +"title": 56803
      }
      0 => App\Entity\EntryComment {#1559}
    ]
    -id: 6174
    -titleTs: "'colorado':9 'court':10 'forc':2 'googl':1 'histori':7 'reveal':4 'rule':11 'search':6 'user':5"
    -bodyTs: null
    +cross: false
    +upVotes: 0
    +downVotes: 0
    +ranking: 1697718064
    +visibility: "visible             "
    +apId: "https://lemmy.nz/post/2456087"
    +editedAt: null
    +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697631664 {#1407
      date: 2023-10-18 14:21:04.0 +02:00
    }
    +__isInitialized__: true
     …2
  }
  +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1567 …}
  +image: null
  +parent: null
  +root: null
  +body: """
    I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.\n
    \n
    Edit:\n
    \n
    > The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence  \n
    >  obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in  \n
    >  circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively  \n
    >  reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even  \n
    >  if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see  \n
    >  also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,  \n
    >  35  \n
    >  codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme  \n
    >  Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will  \n
    >  deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was  \n
    >  illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of  \n
    >  suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.\n
    \n
    > But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held  \n
    >  there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized  \n
    >  that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records  \n
    >  when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes  \n
    >  establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado  \n
    >  law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and  \n
    >  Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.\n
    \n
    > 38  \n
    >  ¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a  \n
    >  constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.  \n
    >  Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under  \n
    >  the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of  \n
    >  privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing  \n
    >  that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had  \n
    >  no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between  \n
    >  the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.\n
    \n
    In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.\n
    \n
    [https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf)
    """
  +lang: "en"
  +isAdult: false
  +favouriteCount: 8
  +score: 0
  +lastActive: DateTime @1697652838 {#1650
    date: 2023-10-18 20:13:58.0 +02:00
  }
  +ip: null
  +tags: null
  +mentions: [
    "@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz"
  ]
  +children: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1566 …}
  +nested: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1562 …}
  +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1554 …}
  +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1556 …}
  +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1555 …}
  +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1620 …}
  -id: 56739
  -bodyTs: "'-3':123 '-308':124 '/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':392 '1272':109 '16':122 '19':170 '2023':126,305 '222':99 '294':298 '35':118 '38':271 '468':166 '509':300 '522':301 '70':272 '869':106 '918':169 '933':231 '941':102 'a.3d':299 'absenc':330 'account':369 'achiev':38 'act':73 'alleg':362 'allow':387 'alreadi':211 'also':104 'amend':59 'analysi':190 'appli':207 'bad':14 'c.r.s':125 'case':26,150,173,234 'cf':294 'chanc':143 'circumst':65 'cite':232 'codifi':119 'colorado':112,247,389 'commonwealth':295 'conduct':158 'conflict':3 'connect':359 'constitut':285,343 'contrast':274 'cost':176 'court':133,278,373 'crime':262,363 'ct':304 'decid':228 'defend':315 'definit':31 'demonstr':357 'design':19 'detach':84 'deter':146 'determin':94 'deterr':183 'didn':154 'distinguish':194 'doctrin':313 'dpd':345 'dragonet':12 'edit':40 'effect':184 'essenc':371 'establish':237,280,334 'even':88 'evid':52,68 'except':45,117,137,204 'exclusionari':48 'exist':138 'expect':218,321 'explicit':333 'faith':44,116,189,203 'fals':22 'feel':7 'financi':223,242 'first':163 'fourth':58 'good':43,115,188,202 'good-faith':42,114,187,201 'googl':291,339,368 'gutierrez':98,192,226,264 'held':197 'histori':293,327,341 'hold':110,306 'howev':27 'id':229,270 'illeg':160 'individu':214,240,266,282,337,367 'inform':11 'interest':288 'invalid':97 'issu':81 'know':156,350 'kurtz':297 'later':93 'law':248 'leftwich':105 'leon':165 'littl':142 'magistr':87 'might':353 'misconduct':148 'need':355 'neutral':86 'nexus':257 'notic':254 'numer':233 'object':75 'obtain':53,70 'obvious':10 'offic':72 'one':380 'otherwis':39 'outweigh':180 'p.2d':107 'p.3d':100 'pa':302 'parti':312 'place':164 'polic':147,153,251 'posit':23,32 'possibl':182 'preced':332 'privaci':220,287,323 'produc':21,29 'protect':245,286,344 'provid':50 're':17 'reason':76,217,320,348 'recogn':212 'record':224,243,268 'relianc':77 'requir':259 'rule':49,135 'say':375 'search':292,326,340 'section':121 'see':103,269 'seymour':365 'similar':129 'social':175 'specif':18 'statut':236 'substanti':128 'super':303 'suppress':63,144,178 'suprem':132 'tax':267 'third':311 'third-parti':310 'time':383 'today':276 'true':195 'u.s':167 'v':296 'violat':55 'warrant':80,91 'would':179 'wouldn':34 'www.courts.state.co.us':391 'www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf](https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/court_probation/supreme_court/opinions/2023/23sa12.pdf)':390"
  +ranking: 0
  +commentCount: 0
  +upVotes: 0
  +downVotes: 0
  +visibility: "visible             "
  +apId: "https://kbin.social/m/privacyguides@lemmy.one/t/549368/-/comment/3030361"
  +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697635658 {#1548
    date: 2023-10-18 15:27:38.0 +02:00
  }
  +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1697634319 {#1564
    date: 2023-10-18 15:05:19.0 +02:00
  }
  +"title": 56739
}
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
21 DENIED ROLE_ADMIN 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details
22 DENIED ROLE_MODERATOR 
null
 
"Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\Voter\TwoFactorInProgressVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\RoleHierarchyVoter"
 ACCESS DENIED 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\EntryVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MagazineVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageThreadVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\MessageVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\NotificationVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\OAuth2UserConsentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostCommentVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\PostVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN 
"App\Security\Voter\UserVoter"
 ACCESS ABSTAIN
Show voter details