Security
Token
There is no security token.
Firewall
main
Name
Security enabled
Stateless
Configuration
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| provider | security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider |
| context | main |
| entry_point | App\Security\KbinAuthenticator |
| user_checker | App\Security\UserChecker |
| access_denied_handler | (none) |
| access_denied_url | (none) |
| authenticators | [ "two_factor" "remember_me" "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator" "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator" "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator" "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator" "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator" ] |
Listeners
| Listener | Duration | Response |
|---|---|---|
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723 -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -httpPort: 80 -httpsPort: 443 } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …} -sessionKey: "_security_main" -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …} -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} -registered: false -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …} -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …} } |
0.74 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584 -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582 -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …} -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …} } |
0.04 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …} -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -options: [ "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token" "csrf_token_id" => "logout" "logout_path" => "app_logout" ] -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …} -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …} -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Authenticators
No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.
Access Decision
affirmative
Strategy
Access decision log
| # | Result | Attributes | Object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DENIED | ROLE_USER | null |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1568 +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Intel-N100-good-enough-for-1Gbits-internet" +title: "Intel N100 good enough for 1Gbits internet ?" +url: null +body: """ I just recently got a new ISP and new internet speed 1200/600, my current firewall with opnsense can not handle the speed (AMD GX-412TC SOC), I have been looking for a new firewall (opnsense + 2.5 Ethernet) and found several with the Intel N100 CPU (2023).\n \n I was wondering if this CPU is good enough to handle the Internet speed and if there is overhead? """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 21 +favouriteCount: 18 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1722167775 {#1442 : 2024-07-28 13:56:15.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 28457 -titleTs: "'1gbits':6 'enough':4 'good':3 'intel':1 'internet':7 'n100':2" -bodyTs: "'1200/600':12 '2.5':37 '2023':47 '412tc':26 'amd':23 'cpu':46,53 'current':14 'enough':56 'ethernet':38 'firewal':15,35 'found':40 'good':55 'got':4 'gx':25 'gx-412tc':24 'handl':20,58 'intel':44 'internet':10,60 'isp':7 'look':31 'n100':45 'new':6,9,34 'opnsens':17,36 'overhead':66 'recent':3 'sever':41 'soc':27 'speed':11,22,61 'wonder':50" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1704916030 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/10505505" +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1719548132 {#1640 : 2024-06-28 06:15:32.0 +02:00 } +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704829630 {#1423 : 2024-01-09 20:47:10.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | DENIED | edit | App\Entity\Entry {#1568 +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Intel-N100-good-enough-for-1Gbits-internet" +title: "Intel N100 good enough for 1Gbits internet ?" +url: null +body: """ I just recently got a new ISP and new internet speed 1200/600, my current firewall with opnsense can not handle the speed (AMD GX-412TC SOC), I have been looking for a new firewall (opnsense + 2.5 Ethernet) and found several with the Intel N100 CPU (2023).\n \n I was wondering if this CPU is good enough to handle the Internet speed and if there is overhead? """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 21 +favouriteCount: 18 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1722167775 {#1442 : 2024-07-28 13:56:15.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 28457 -titleTs: "'1gbits':6 'enough':4 'good':3 'intel':1 'internet':7 'n100':2" -bodyTs: "'1200/600':12 '2.5':37 '2023':47 '412tc':26 'amd':23 'cpu':46,53 'current':14 'enough':56 'ethernet':38 'firewal':15,35 'found':40 'good':55 'got':4 'gx':25 'gx-412tc':24 'handl':20,58 'intel':44 'internet':10,60 'isp':7 'look':31 'n100':45 'new':6,9,34 'opnsens':17,36 'overhead':66 'recent':3 'sever':41 'soc':27 'speed':11,22,61 'wonder':50" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1704916030 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/10505505" +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1719548132 {#1640 : 2024-06-28 06:15:32.0 +02:00 } +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704829630 {#1423 : 2024-01-09 20:47:10.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1568 +user: App\Entity\User {#260 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Intel-N100-good-enough-for-1Gbits-internet" +title: "Intel N100 good enough for 1Gbits internet ?" +url: null +body: """ I just recently got a new ISP and new internet speed 1200/600, my current firewall with opnsense can not handle the speed (AMD GX-412TC SOC), I have been looking for a new firewall (opnsense + 2.5 Ethernet) and found several with the Intel N100 CPU (2023).\n \n I was wondering if this CPU is good enough to handle the Internet speed and if there is overhead? """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 21 +favouriteCount: 18 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1722167775 {#1442 : 2024-07-28 13:56:15.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 28457 -titleTs: "'1gbits':6 'enough':4 'good':3 'intel':1 'internet':7 'n100':2" -bodyTs: "'1200/600':12 '2.5':37 '2023':47 '412tc':26 'amd':23 'cpu':46,53 'current':14 'enough':56 'ethernet':38 'firewal':15,35 'found':40 'good':55 'got':4 'gx':25 'gx-412tc':24 'handl':20,58 'intel':44 'internet':10,60 'isp':7 'look':31 'n100':45 'new':6,9,34 'opnsens':17,36 'overhead':66 'recent':3 'sever':41 'soc':27 'speed':11,22,61 'wonder':50" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1704916030 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/10505505" +editedAt: DateTimeImmutable @1719548132 {#1640 : 2024-06-28 06:15:32.0 +02:00 } +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1704829630 {#1423 : 2024-01-09 20:47:10.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||