Security
Token
There is no security token.
Firewall
main
Name
Security enabled
Stateless
Configuration
Key | Value |
---|---|
provider | security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider |
context | main |
entry_point | App\Security\KbinAuthenticator |
user_checker | App\Security\UserChecker |
access_denied_handler | (none) |
access_denied_url | (none) |
authenticators | [ "two_factor" "remember_me" "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator" "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator" "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator" "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator" "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator" ] |
Listeners
Listener | Duration | Response |
---|---|---|
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723 -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -httpPort: 80 -httpsPort: 443 } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …} -sessionKey: "_security_main" -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …} -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} -registered: false -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …} -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …} } |
41.11 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584 -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582 -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …} -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …} } |
0.08 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …} -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -options: [ "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token" "csrf_token_id" => "logout" "logout_path" => "app_logout" ] -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …} -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …} -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Authenticators
No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.
Access Decision
affirmative
Strategy
Access decision log
# | Result | Attributes | Object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DENIED | ROLE_USER | null |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1431 +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1661 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1641 …} +slug: "Was-I-temp-banned-for-anti-Zionism" +title: "Was I temp banned for anti-Zionism?" +url: null +body: """ [The mod log](https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userId=708101).\n \n I can’t see what other issues there could possibly be with this. It wasn’t even spicy as anti-Zionism goes, and all the factual content was accurate.\n \n I can see how the comment from months ago could be seen as insensitive, although my intention was more to point out the inherent racism in the opposite position. That’s not the one that did it, though. """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 0 +favouriteCount: 10 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1698353466 {#1465 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1648 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1675 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1672 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1578 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …} +children: [] -id: 7897 -titleTs: "'anti':7 'anti-zion':6 'ban':4 'temp':3 'zionism':8" -bodyTs: "'/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':6 'accur':36 'ago':45 'although':51 'anti':27 'anti-zion':26 'comment':42 'content':34 'could':15,46 'even':23 'factual':33 'goe':29 'inher':60 'insensit':50 'intent':53 'issu':13 'lemmy.ml':5 'lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':4 'log':3 'mod':2 'month':44 'one':70 'opposit':64 'point':57 'posit':65 'possibl':16 'racism':61 'see':10,39 'seen':48 'spici':24 'though':74 'wasn':21 'zionism':28" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1698375966 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6486890" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698353466 {#1644 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | DENIED | edit | App\Entity\Entry {#1431 +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1661 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1641 …} +slug: "Was-I-temp-banned-for-anti-Zionism" +title: "Was I temp banned for anti-Zionism?" +url: null +body: """ [The mod log](https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userId=708101).\n \n I can’t see what other issues there could possibly be with this. It wasn’t even spicy as anti-Zionism goes, and all the factual content was accurate.\n \n I can see how the comment from months ago could be seen as insensitive, although my intention was more to point out the inherent racism in the opposite position. That’s not the one that did it, though. """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 0 +favouriteCount: 10 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1698353466 {#1465 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1648 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1675 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1672 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1578 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …} +children: [] -id: 7897 -titleTs: "'anti':7 'anti-zion':6 'ban':4 'temp':3 'zionism':8" -bodyTs: "'/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':6 'accur':36 'ago':45 'although':51 'anti':27 'anti-zion':26 'comment':42 'content':34 'could':15,46 'even':23 'factual':33 'goe':29 'inher':60 'insensit':50 'intent':53 'issu':13 'lemmy.ml':5 'lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':4 'log':3 'mod':2 'month':44 'one':70 'opposit':64 'point':57 'posit':65 'possibl':16 'racism':61 'see':10,39 'seen':48 'spici':24 'though':74 'wasn':21 'zionism':28" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1698375966 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6486890" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698353466 {#1644 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1431 +user: App\Entity\User {#261 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1661 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1641 …} +slug: "Was-I-temp-banned-for-anti-Zionism" +title: "Was I temp banned for anti-Zionism?" +url: null +body: """ [The mod log](https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userId=708101).\n \n I can’t see what other issues there could possibly be with this. It wasn’t even spicy as anti-Zionism goes, and all the factual content was accurate.\n \n I can see how the comment from months ago could be seen as insensitive, although my intention was more to point out the inherent racism in the opposite position. That’s not the one that did it, though. """ +type: "article" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 0 +favouriteCount: 10 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1698353466 {#1465 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1648 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1675 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1672 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1579 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1578 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1549 …} +children: [] -id: 7897 -titleTs: "'anti':7 'anti-zion':6 'ban':4 'temp':3 'zionism':8" -bodyTs: "'/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':6 'accur':36 'ago':45 'although':51 'anti':27 'anti-zion':26 'comment':42 'content':34 'could':15,46 'even':23 'factual':33 'goe':29 'inher':60 'insensit':50 'intent':53 'issu':13 'lemmy.ml':5 'lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&userid=708101).':4 'log':3 'mod':2 'month':44 'one':70 'opposit':64 'point':57 'posit':65 'possibl':16 'racism':61 'see':10,39 'seen':48 'spici':24 'though':74 'wasn':21 'zionism':28" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1698375966 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6486890" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698353466 {#1644 : 2023-10-26 22:51:06.0 +02:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | DENIED | ROLE_ADMIN | null |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | DENIED | ROLE_MODERATOR | null |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|