Security
Token
There is no security token.
Firewall
main
Name
Security enabled
Stateless
Configuration
Key | Value |
---|---|
provider | security.user.provider.concrete.app_user_provider |
context | main |
entry_point | App\Security\KbinAuthenticator |
user_checker | App\Security\UserChecker |
access_denied_handler | (none) |
access_denied_url | (none) |
authenticators | [ "two_factor" "remember_me" "App\Security\KbinAuthenticator" "App\Security\FacebookAuthenticator" "App\Security\GoogleAuthenticator" "App\Security\GithubAuthenticator" "App\Security\KeycloakAuthenticator" ] |
Listeners
Listener | Duration | Response |
---|---|---|
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ChannelListener {#723 -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -httpPort: 80 -httpsPort: 443 } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ContextListener {#706 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\TokenStorage {#1017 …} -sessionKey: "_security_main" -logger: Monolog\Logger {#783 …} -userProviders: Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Argument\RewindableGenerator {#705 …} -dispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} -registered: false -trustResolver: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authentication\AuthenticationTrustResolver {#780 …} -sessionTrackerEnabler: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage::enableUsageTracking(): void {#703 …} } |
4.13 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AuthenticatorManagerListener {#584 -authenticatorManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticatorManager {#595 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Http\Firewall\TwoFactorAccessListener {#582 -twoFactorFirewallConfig: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\TwoFactor\TwoFactorFirewallConfig {#842 …} -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -twoFactorAccessDecider: Scheb\TwoFactorBundle\Security\Authorization\TwoFactorAccessDecider {#581 …} } |
0.06 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\AccessListener {#579 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -accessDecisionManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\TraceableAccessDecisionManager {#937 …} -map: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\AccessMap {#722 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\LogoutListener {#786 -tokenStorage: Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authentication\Token\Storage\UsageTrackingTokenStorage {#1018 …} -options: [ "csrf_parameter" => "_csrf_token" "csrf_token_id" => "logout" "logout_path" => "app_logout" ] -httpUtils: Symfony\Component\Security\Http\HttpUtils {#841 …} -csrfTokenManager: Symfony\Component\Security\Csrf\CsrfTokenManager {#1015 …} -eventDispatcher: Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\Debug\TraceableEventDispatcher {#747 …} } |
0.00 ms | (none) |
Authenticators
No authenticators have been recorded. Check previous profiles on your authentication endpoint.
Access Decision
affirmative
Strategy
Access decision log
# | Result | Attributes | Object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DENIED | ROLE_USER | null |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1549 +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Privacy-first-Cory-Doctorow" +title: "Privacy first – Cory Doctorow" +url: "https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/06/privacy-first/" +body: """ > Here’s the “Privacy First” pitch: whatever is going on with all of the problems of the internet, all of these problems are made worse by commercial surveillance.\n \n If something like this were implemented in US federal law, what could the downsides be? Like [California Proposition 65](https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods), the “cookie law” didn’t stop tracking, it just made more pop ups. Would this do the same thing? """ +type: "link" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 2 +favouriteCount: 58 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1702620433 {#1415 : 2023-12-15 07:07:13.0 +01:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 22229 -titleTs: "'cori':3 'doctorow':4 'first':2 'privaci':1" -bodyTs: "'/fact-sheets/foods),':50 '65':47 'california':45 'commerci':27 'cooki':52 'could':40 'didn':54 'downsid':42 'feder':37 'first':5 'go':9 'implement':34 'internet':18 'law':38,53 'like':31,44 'made':24,60 'pitch':6 'pop':62 'privaci':4 'problem':15,22 'proposit':46 'someth':30 'stop':56 'surveil':28 'thing':69 'track':57 'up':63 'us':36 'whatev':7 'wors':25 'would':64 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov':49 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods),':48" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1702655557 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9563188" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702569157 {#1641 : 2023-12-14 16:52:37.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | DENIED | edit | App\Entity\Entry {#1549 +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Privacy-first-Cory-Doctorow" +title: "Privacy first – Cory Doctorow" +url: "https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/06/privacy-first/" +body: """ > Here’s the “Privacy First” pitch: whatever is going on with all of the problems of the internet, all of these problems are made worse by commercial surveillance.\n \n If something like this were implemented in US federal law, what could the downsides be? Like [California Proposition 65](https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods), the “cookie law” didn’t stop tracking, it just made more pop ups. Would this do the same thing? """ +type: "link" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 2 +favouriteCount: 58 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1702620433 {#1415 : 2023-12-15 07:07:13.0 +01:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 22229 -titleTs: "'cori':3 'doctorow':4 'first':2 'privaci':1" -bodyTs: "'/fact-sheets/foods),':50 '65':47 'california':45 'commerci':27 'cooki':52 'could':40 'didn':54 'downsid':42 'feder':37 'first':5 'go':9 'implement':34 'internet':18 'law':38,53 'like':31,44 'made':24,60 'pitch':6 'pop':62 'privaci':4 'problem':15,22 'proposit':46 'someth':30 'stop':56 'surveil':28 'thing':69 'track':57 'up':63 'us':36 'whatev':7 'wors':25 'would':64 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov':49 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods),':48" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1702655557 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9563188" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702569157 {#1641 : 2023-12-14 16:52:37.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | DENIED | moderate | App\Entity\Entry {#1549 +user: App\Entity\User {#259 …} +magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1736 …} +image: null +domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1686 …} +slug: "Privacy-first-Cory-Doctorow" +title: "Privacy first – Cory Doctorow" +url: "https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/06/privacy-first/" +body: """ > Here’s the “Privacy First” pitch: whatever is going on with all of the problems of the internet, all of these problems are made worse by commercial surveillance.\n \n If something like this were implemented in US federal law, what could the downsides be? Like [California Proposition 65](https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods), the “cookie law” didn’t stop tracking, it just made more pop ups. Would this do the same thing? """ +type: "link" +lang: "en" +isOc: false +hasEmbed: false +commentCount: 2 +favouriteCount: 58 +score: 0 +isAdult: false +sticky: false +lastActive: DateTime @1702620433 {#1415 : 2023-12-15 07:07:13.0 +01:00 } +ip: null +adaAmount: 0 +tags: null +mentions: null +comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1691 …} +votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1795 …} +reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1616 …} +favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1717 …} +notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1714 …} +badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2458 …} +children: [] -id: 22229 -titleTs: "'cori':3 'doctorow':4 'first':2 'privaci':1" -bodyTs: "'/fact-sheets/foods),':50 '65':47 'california':45 'commerci':27 'cooki':52 'could':40 'didn':54 'downsid':42 'feder':37 'first':5 'go':9 'implement':34 'internet':18 'law':38,53 'like':31,44 'made':24,60 'pitch':6 'pop':62 'privaci':4 'problem':15,22 'proposit':46 'someth':30 'stop':56 'surveil':28 'thing':69 'track':57 'up':63 'us':36 'whatev':7 'wors':25 'would':64 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov':49 'www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/foods),':48" +cross: false +upVotes: 0 +downVotes: 0 +ranking: 1702655557 +visibility: "visible " +apId: "https://lemmy.world/post/9563188" +editedAt: null +createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1702569157 {#1641 : 2023-12-14 16:52:37.0 +01:00 } } |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|