1 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
2 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2381
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Raktajino-has-liquor-in-it"
+title: "Raktajino... has liquor in it?"
+url: null
+body: """
I like coffee. I like Star Trek.\n
\n
I’ve had a mild interest in the raktajino, a Klingon coffee drink commonly consumed in DS9. I’ve looked up a few fan theories and fan recipes. I haven’t seen any references to a canonical recipe, so I get that there’s a bit of fun and personal preference involved.\n
\n
The only thing I don’t understand is why raktajino is commonly claimed to be made with liquor. On the one hand, I understand why Klingons might want a stiff additive to their caffeine. However, the context in which characters on DS9 drink it does not suggest the presence of intoxicants. I recall at least a few occasions in which bridge officers, while on duty, drink a raktajino. Surely even synthol is not OK when you’re on shift for Starfleet.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 15
+favouriteCount: 29
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724395167 {#2378
date: 2024-08-23 08:39:27.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1708 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1410 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+children: []
-id: 20131
-titleTs: "'liquor':3 'raktajino':1"
-bodyTs: "'addit':90 'bit':53 'bridg':120 'caffein':93 'canon':44 'charact':99 'claim':72 'coffe':3,19 'common':21,71 'consum':22 'context':96 'drink':20,102,125 'ds9':24,101 'duti':124 'even':129 'fan':31,34 'fun':55 'get':48 'hand':81 'haven':37 'howev':94 'interest':13 'intoxic':110 'involv':59 'klingon':18,85 'least':114 'like':2,5 'liquor':77 'look':27 'made':75 'might':86 'mild':12 'occas':117 'offic':121 'ok':133 'one':80 'person':57 'prefer':58 'presenc':108 'raktajino':16,69,127 're':136 'recal':112 'recip':35,45 'refer':41 'seen':39 'shift':138 'star':6 'starfleet':140 'stiff':89 'suggest':106 'sure':128 'synthol':130 'theori':32 'thing':62 'trek':7 'understand':66,83 've':9,26 'want':87"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701823161
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/8705066"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701736761 {#2379
date: 2023-12-05 01:39:21.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
3 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2381
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Raktajino-has-liquor-in-it"
+title: "Raktajino... has liquor in it?"
+url: null
+body: """
I like coffee. I like Star Trek.\n
\n
I’ve had a mild interest in the raktajino, a Klingon coffee drink commonly consumed in DS9. I’ve looked up a few fan theories and fan recipes. I haven’t seen any references to a canonical recipe, so I get that there’s a bit of fun and personal preference involved.\n
\n
The only thing I don’t understand is why raktajino is commonly claimed to be made with liquor. On the one hand, I understand why Klingons might want a stiff additive to their caffeine. However, the context in which characters on DS9 drink it does not suggest the presence of intoxicants. I recall at least a few occasions in which bridge officers, while on duty, drink a raktajino. Surely even synthol is not OK when you’re on shift for Starfleet.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 15
+favouriteCount: 29
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724395167 {#2378
date: 2024-08-23 08:39:27.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1708 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1410 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+children: []
-id: 20131
-titleTs: "'liquor':3 'raktajino':1"
-bodyTs: "'addit':90 'bit':53 'bridg':120 'caffein':93 'canon':44 'charact':99 'claim':72 'coffe':3,19 'common':21,71 'consum':22 'context':96 'drink':20,102,125 'ds9':24,101 'duti':124 'even':129 'fan':31,34 'fun':55 'get':48 'hand':81 'haven':37 'howev':94 'interest':13 'intoxic':110 'involv':59 'klingon':18,85 'least':114 'like':2,5 'liquor':77 'look':27 'made':75 'might':86 'mild':12 'occas':117 'offic':121 'ok':133 'one':80 'person':57 'prefer':58 'presenc':108 'raktajino':16,69,127 're':136 'recal':112 'recip':35,45 'refer':41 'seen':39 'shift':138 'star':6 'starfleet':140 'stiff':89 'suggest':106 'sure':128 'synthol':130 'theori':32 'thing':62 'trek':7 'understand':66,83 've':9,26 'want':87"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701823161
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/8705066"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701736761 {#2379
date: 2023-12-05 01:39:21.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
4 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2381
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Raktajino-has-liquor-in-it"
+title: "Raktajino... has liquor in it?"
+url: null
+body: """
I like coffee. I like Star Trek.\n
\n
I’ve had a mild interest in the raktajino, a Klingon coffee drink commonly consumed in DS9. I’ve looked up a few fan theories and fan recipes. I haven’t seen any references to a canonical recipe, so I get that there’s a bit of fun and personal preference involved.\n
\n
The only thing I don’t understand is why raktajino is commonly claimed to be made with liquor. On the one hand, I understand why Klingons might want a stiff additive to their caffeine. However, the context in which characters on DS9 drink it does not suggest the presence of intoxicants. I recall at least a few occasions in which bridge officers, while on duty, drink a raktajino. Surely even synthol is not OK when you’re on shift for Starfleet.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 15
+favouriteCount: 29
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1724395167 {#2378
date: 2024-08-23 08:39:27.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2383 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1906 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1708 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1410 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1907 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1407 …}
+children: []
-id: 20131
-titleTs: "'liquor':3 'raktajino':1"
-bodyTs: "'addit':90 'bit':53 'bridg':120 'caffein':93 'canon':44 'charact':99 'claim':72 'coffe':3,19 'common':21,71 'consum':22 'context':96 'drink':20,102,125 'ds9':24,101 'duti':124 'even':129 'fan':31,34 'fun':55 'get':48 'hand':81 'haven':37 'howev':94 'interest':13 'intoxic':110 'involv':59 'klingon':18,85 'least':114 'like':2,5 'liquor':77 'look':27 'made':75 'might':86 'mild':12 'occas':117 'offic':121 'ok':133 'one':80 'person':57 'prefer':58 'presenc':108 'raktajino':16,69,127 're':136 'recal':112 'recip':35,45 'refer':41 'seen':39 'shift':138 'star':6 'starfleet':140 'stiff':89 'suggest':106 'sure':128 'synthol':130 'theori':32 'thing':62 'trek':7 'understand':66,83 've':9,26 'want':87"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1701823161
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/8705066"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1701736761 {#2379
date: 2023-12-05 01:39:21.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
5 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
6 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2471
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2363 …}
+slug: "The-Paperweight-Dilemma-Original-Pinephone-might-lose-future-kernel-updates"
+title: "The Paperweight Dilemma: Original Pinephone might lose future kernel updates if devs can't pay down tech debt"
+url: "https://blog.mobian.org/posts/2023/09/30/paperweight-dilemma/"
+body: """
I *think* I’m reading this blogpost correctly: Mobian devs working on maintaining Linux kernel support for Pinephone painted themselves into a corner with tech debt, and may not be able to continue porting new kernel updates. Pinephone Pro runs a different chipset with wider community support, so it’s not affected.\n
\n
I didn’t see any communities or articles talking about this, so either it’s not a big deal, or nobody is talking about it.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 13
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698558900 {#2469
date: 2023-10-29 06:55:00.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2360 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2361 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+children: []
-id: 9818
-titleTs: "'debt':18 'dev':12 'dilemma':3 'futur':8 'kernel':9 'lose':7 'might':6 'origin':4 'paperweight':2 'pay':15 'pinephon':5 'tech':17 'updat':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':31 'affect':52 'articl':60 'big':70 'blogpost':7 'chipset':43 'communiti':46,58 'continu':33 'corner':23 'correct':8 'deal':71 'debt':26 'dev':10 'didn':54 'differ':42 'either':65 'kernel':15,36 'linux':14 'm':4 'maintain':13 'may':28 'mobian':9 'new':35 'nobodi':73 'paint':19 'pinephon':18,38 'port':34 'pro':39 'read':5 'run':40 'see':56 'support':16,47 'talk':61,75 'tech':25 'think':2 'updat':37 'wider':45 'work':11"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698405464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6492773"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698360964 {#2467
date: 2023-10-27 00:56:04.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
7 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2471
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2363 …}
+slug: "The-Paperweight-Dilemma-Original-Pinephone-might-lose-future-kernel-updates"
+title: "The Paperweight Dilemma: Original Pinephone might lose future kernel updates if devs can't pay down tech debt"
+url: "https://blog.mobian.org/posts/2023/09/30/paperweight-dilemma/"
+body: """
I *think* I’m reading this blogpost correctly: Mobian devs working on maintaining Linux kernel support for Pinephone painted themselves into a corner with tech debt, and may not be able to continue porting new kernel updates. Pinephone Pro runs a different chipset with wider community support, so it’s not affected.\n
\n
I didn’t see any communities or articles talking about this, so either it’s not a big deal, or nobody is talking about it.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 13
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698558900 {#2469
date: 2023-10-29 06:55:00.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2360 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2361 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+children: []
-id: 9818
-titleTs: "'debt':18 'dev':12 'dilemma':3 'futur':8 'kernel':9 'lose':7 'might':6 'origin':4 'paperweight':2 'pay':15 'pinephon':5 'tech':17 'updat':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':31 'affect':52 'articl':60 'big':70 'blogpost':7 'chipset':43 'communiti':46,58 'continu':33 'corner':23 'correct':8 'deal':71 'debt':26 'dev':10 'didn':54 'differ':42 'either':65 'kernel':15,36 'linux':14 'm':4 'maintain':13 'may':28 'mobian':9 'new':35 'nobodi':73 'paint':19 'pinephon':18,38 'port':34 'pro':39 'read':5 'run':40 'see':56 'support':16,47 'talk':61,75 'tech':25 'think':2 'updat':37 'wider':45 'work':11"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698405464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6492773"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698360964 {#2467
date: 2023-10-27 00:56:04.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
8 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2471
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#2371 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#2363 …}
+slug: "The-Paperweight-Dilemma-Original-Pinephone-might-lose-future-kernel-updates"
+title: "The Paperweight Dilemma: Original Pinephone might lose future kernel updates if devs can't pay down tech debt"
+url: "https://blog.mobian.org/posts/2023/09/30/paperweight-dilemma/"
+body: """
I *think* I’m reading this blogpost correctly: Mobian devs working on maintaining Linux kernel support for Pinephone painted themselves into a corner with tech debt, and may not be able to continue porting new kernel updates. Pinephone Pro runs a different chipset with wider community support, so it’s not affected.\n
\n
I didn’t see any communities or articles talking about this, so either it’s not a big deal, or nobody is talking about it.
"""
+type: "link"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 13
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1698558900 {#2469
date: 2023-10-29 06:55:00.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2370 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2360 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2361 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2372 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2386 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2385 …}
+children: []
-id: 9818
-titleTs: "'debt':18 'dev':12 'dilemma':3 'futur':8 'kernel':9 'lose':7 'might':6 'origin':4 'paperweight':2 'pay':15 'pinephon':5 'tech':17 'updat':10"
-bodyTs: "'abl':31 'affect':52 'articl':60 'big':70 'blogpost':7 'chipset':43 'communiti':46,58 'continu':33 'corner':23 'correct':8 'deal':71 'debt':26 'dev':10 'didn':54 'differ':42 'either':65 'kernel':15,36 'linux':14 'm':4 'maintain':13 'may':28 'mobian':9 'new':35 'nobodi':73 'paint':19 'pinephon':18,38 'port':34 'pro':39 'read':5 'run':40 'see':56 'support':16,47 'talk':61,75 'tech':25 'think':2 'updat':37 'wider':45 'work':11"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1698405464
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6492773"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1698360964 {#2467
date: 2023-10-27 00:56:04.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
9 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
10 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2462
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Does-anyone-in-Starfleet-wear-sunglasses"
+title: "Does anyone in Starfleet wear sunglasses?"
+url: null
+body: """
I don’t mean on the holodeck, shore leave, or when transported to the past and needing to fit in.\n
\n
Seems like if you’re on an away mission to, say, a desert planet, sunglasses might be useful. I don’t recall anything wearing them.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699241675 {#1740
date: 2023-11-06 04:34:35.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+children: []
-id: 9412
-titleTs: "'anyon':2 'starfleet':4 'sunglass':6 'wear':5"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'away':28 'desert':33 'fit':19 'holodeck':7 'leav':9 'like':22 'mean':4 'might':36 'mission':29 'need':17 'past':15 'planet':34 're':25 'recal':42 'say':31 'seem':21 'shore':8 'sunglass':35 'transport':12 'use':38 'wear':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699123410
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6969181"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699041910 {#1717
date: 2023-11-03 21:05:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
11 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2462
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Does-anyone-in-Starfleet-wear-sunglasses"
+title: "Does anyone in Starfleet wear sunglasses?"
+url: null
+body: """
I don’t mean on the holodeck, shore leave, or when transported to the past and needing to fit in.\n
\n
Seems like if you’re on an away mission to, say, a desert planet, sunglasses might be useful. I don’t recall anything wearing them.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699241675 {#1740
date: 2023-11-06 04:34:35.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+children: []
-id: 9412
-titleTs: "'anyon':2 'starfleet':4 'sunglass':6 'wear':5"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'away':28 'desert':33 'fit':19 'holodeck':7 'leav':9 'like':22 'mean':4 'might':36 'mission':29 'need':17 'past':15 'planet':34 're':25 'recal':42 'say':31 'seem':21 'shore':8 'sunglass':35 'transport':12 'use':38 'wear':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699123410
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6969181"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699041910 {#1717
date: 2023-11-03 21:05:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
12 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#2462
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Does-anyone-in-Starfleet-wear-sunglasses"
+title: "Does anyone in Starfleet wear sunglasses?"
+url: null
+body: """
I don’t mean on the holodeck, shore leave, or when transported to the past and needing to fit in.\n
\n
Seems like if you’re on an away mission to, say, a desert planet, sunglasses might be useful. I don’t recall anything wearing them.
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 7
+favouriteCount: 17
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1699241675 {#1740
date: 2023-11-06 04:34:35.0 +01:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2461 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2448 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2411 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2457 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2455 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2468 …}
+children: []
-id: 9412
-titleTs: "'anyon':2 'starfleet':4 'sunglass':6 'wear':5"
-bodyTs: "'anyth':43 'away':28 'desert':33 'fit':19 'holodeck':7 'leav':9 'like':22 'mean':4 'might':36 'mission':29 'need':17 'past':15 'planet':34 're':25 'recal':42 'say':31 'seem':21 'shore':8 'sunglass':35 'transport':12 'use':38 'wear':44"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1699123410
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/6969181"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1699041910 {#1717
date: 2023-11-03 21:05:10.0 +01:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
13 |
DENIED
|
ROLE_USER
|
null |
|
Show voter details
|
14 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Could-Voyager-have-made-it-home-if-Tuvix-never-got"
+title: "Could Voyager have made it home if Tuvix never got killed?"
+url: null
+body: """
Let’s assume that Janeway never separated Tuvix and kept him as a crew member. Would the crew have still gotten home?\n
\n
Assumptions:\n
\n
- The subsequent story arc (and episode plots) are generally the same\n
- Any episode where the threat is caused by (or related to) the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok never happens\n
- Any episode where the day is saved by the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok is more dangerous\n
- We can assume that the strengths/weaknesses of Tuvix remain throughout the series\n
\n
Do they still make it home? If not, what episodes are likely to end in disaster?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693760108 {#1574
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 10375
-titleTs: "'could':1 'got':10 'home':6 'kill':11 'made':4 'never':9 'tuvix':8 'voyag':2"
-bodyTs: "'arc':27 'assum':3,75 'assumpt':23 'caus':41 'crew':14,18 'danger':72 'day':59 'disast':100 'end':98 'episod':29,36,56,94 'general':32 'gotten':21 'happen':54 'home':22,90 'individu':47,64 'janeway':5 'kept':10 'let':1 'like':96 'make':88 'member':15 'neelix':50,67 'never':6,53 'person':48,65 'plot':30 'relat':44 'remain':81 'save':61 'separ':7 'seri':84 'still':20,87 'stori':26 'strengths/weaknesses':78 'subsequ':25 'threat':39 'throughout':82 'tuvix':8,80 'tuvok':52,69 'would':16"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1693760108
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/3255891"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693760108 {#1409
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
15 |
DENIED
|
edit
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Could-Voyager-have-made-it-home-if-Tuvix-never-got"
+title: "Could Voyager have made it home if Tuvix never got killed?"
+url: null
+body: """
Let’s assume that Janeway never separated Tuvix and kept him as a crew member. Would the crew have still gotten home?\n
\n
Assumptions:\n
\n
- The subsequent story arc (and episode plots) are generally the same\n
- Any episode where the threat is caused by (or related to) the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok never happens\n
- Any episode where the day is saved by the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok is more dangerous\n
- We can assume that the strengths/weaknesses of Tuvix remain throughout the series\n
\n
Do they still make it home? If not, what episodes are likely to end in disaster?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693760108 {#1574
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 10375
-titleTs: "'could':1 'got':10 'home':6 'kill':11 'made':4 'never':9 'tuvix':8 'voyag':2"
-bodyTs: "'arc':27 'assum':3,75 'assumpt':23 'caus':41 'crew':14,18 'danger':72 'day':59 'disast':100 'end':98 'episod':29,36,56,94 'general':32 'gotten':21 'happen':54 'home':22,90 'individu':47,64 'janeway':5 'kept':10 'let':1 'like':96 'make':88 'member':15 'neelix':50,67 'never':6,53 'person':48,65 'plot':30 'relat':44 'remain':81 'save':61 'separ':7 'seri':84 'still':20,87 'stori':26 'strengths/weaknesses':78 'subsequ':25 'threat':39 'throughout':82 'tuvix':8,80 'tuvok':52,69 'would':16"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1693760108
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/3255891"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693760108 {#1409
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|
16 |
DENIED
|
moderate
|
App\Entity\Entry {#1585
+user: App\Entity\User {#264 …}
+magazine: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Magazine {#1731 …}
+image: null
+domain: Proxies\__CG__\App\Entity\Domain {#1619 …}
+slug: "Could-Voyager-have-made-it-home-if-Tuvix-never-got"
+title: "Could Voyager have made it home if Tuvix never got killed?"
+url: null
+body: """
Let’s assume that Janeway never separated Tuvix and kept him as a crew member. Would the crew have still gotten home?\n
\n
Assumptions:\n
\n
- The subsequent story arc (and episode plots) are generally the same\n
- Any episode where the threat is caused by (or related to) the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok never happens\n
- Any episode where the day is saved by the individual personalities of Neelix or Tuvok is more dangerous\n
- We can assume that the strengths/weaknesses of Tuvix remain throughout the series\n
\n
Do they still make it home? If not, what episodes are likely to end in disaster?
"""
+type: "article"
+lang: "en"
+isOc: false
+hasEmbed: false
+commentCount: 0
+favouriteCount: 1
+score: 0
+isAdult: false
+sticky: false
+lastActive: DateTime @1693760108 {#1574
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
+ip: null
+adaAmount: 0
+tags: null
+mentions: null
+comments: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1702 …}
+votes: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1683 …}
+reports: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1689 …}
+favourites: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1724 …}
+notifications: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#1727 …}
+badges: Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection {#2464 …}
+children: []
-id: 10375
-titleTs: "'could':1 'got':10 'home':6 'kill':11 'made':4 'never':9 'tuvix':8 'voyag':2"
-bodyTs: "'arc':27 'assum':3,75 'assumpt':23 'caus':41 'crew':14,18 'danger':72 'day':59 'disast':100 'end':98 'episod':29,36,56,94 'general':32 'gotten':21 'happen':54 'home':22,90 'individu':47,64 'janeway':5 'kept':10 'let':1 'like':96 'make':88 'member':15 'neelix':50,67 'never':6,53 'person':48,65 'plot':30 'relat':44 'remain':81 'save':61 'separ':7 'seri':84 'still':20,87 'stori':26 'strengths/weaknesses':78 'subsequ':25 'threat':39 'throughout':82 'tuvix':8,80 'tuvok':52,69 'would':16"
+cross: false
+upVotes: 0
+downVotes: 0
+ranking: 1693760108
+visibility: "visible "
+apId: "https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/3255891"
+editedAt: null
+createdAt: DateTimeImmutable @1693760108 {#1409
date: 2023-09-03 18:55:08.0 +02:00
}
} |
|
Show voter details
|