privacy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

sibloure, in Michael Bazzell's Irish Exit

I’ve listened to every single episode of his podcast for years, bought his books, and honestly his material was kinda life changing for me. Went from using Facebook and Apple ID everything to using Graphene OS, Linux, got friends and family using Signal, masked cards, VOIP numbers, etc. I’m sad to see it go but I understand sometimes it’s time for new chapters in life and wish him well. Maybe one day someone else on staff can create some new episodes.

knfrmity, in Tor isn't as decentralised as we thought?

Just the simple fact that Tor was started with a bunch of US intelligence money is cause for concern.

Omega_Haxors,

The only thing scarier than the fact that the government may be listening in is the fact that any entity can listen in.

rmuk,

You don’t trust the US Government? Good. But the beauty of open-source projects like Tor, Signal, 7Zip, etc is that you don’t need to trust them.

settinmoon, (edited )
@settinmoon@lemmy.ml avatar

Keep in mine not everyone uses TOR to evade the three letter agencies. I’m a TOR relay operator and the main reason I’m running it is to give people in oppressive regimes a better chance at exchanging free information. To these people getting spied on by western intelligence agencies is probably the lesser evil compared to their own tinpot dictatorship governments.

possiblylinux127, in Time to ditch #duckduckgo

Try ddg lite

possiblylinux127, in Tor isn't as decentralised as we thought?

Tor is the best but it is dated

possiblylinux127, in Using a VPN to California or Colorado to increase privacy

What’s special about Colorado?

random65837,

CA isn’t the only state with GDPR like privacy laws.

California, Virginia, Connecticut, Colorado, Utah, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Oregon, Montana, and Texas.

Delation,
@Delation@mstdn.plus avatar

@random65837 @possiblylinux127 wait so my state has privacy laws?

woshang, in Safeguard your privacy: Global Encryption Coalition

An add on: WireMin, Session and SimpleX.

noodlejetski, in is there a way tominimise risk while using facebook?

regardless of what measures you set up, they’ll still be able to collect a bunch of data based on what pages you visit their service, which posts do you spend more time looking at and which you scroll past, and so on.

TheBiscuitLout,

I figure that if I can keep it pretty isolated, they’ll only get “scrolls marketplace in SE uk” out of it - I’m never going to look at the feed or have “friends”.

miss_brainfart, (edited ) in What the actual fuck?!
@miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

They might not know know, but there sure can be a lot of meta data one can use to determine that a person goes to school, where it might be, and what school it most likely is.

Or someone else straight up posted the information publicly. That’s always a possibility you have to consider.

Either way, isolating certain websites and services from each other and/or the rest is certainly a good practice to limit what they can gather about you. If you don’t do that already, that is.

otter, (edited ) in What the actual fuck?!

Sounds like a really spammy and annoying way to promote an app. I assume someone else who has your phone number signed up on their app and gave access to all their contacts. Then the app sends out spam texts to get you to sign up.

Depending on where you are located, you might be able to report it. Otherwise just drop them a bad review, or name and shame them here

edit, I assume it’s this: slickapp.co

fastandcurious,

The thing is there should be a big fucking warning screen when apps ask for contact permissions saying ‘You are sharing OVERLY sensitive and potentially DANGEROUS data’ and then have the screen wait until 15 sec before they can press OK

But they are reserved for when i am using an adblocker

ech,

People still wouldn’t care. The value of privacy, for one’s self or others, has seriously cratered in the last few decades.

simple,

If you have a normal social life it’s honestly expected that a couple of people will leak your phone number (and contact name). Nothing you can really do about it. Happened to me many times.

sour,
@sour@kbin.social avatar

am not wantings to be social anymore

MigratingtoLemmy,

I suppose I’m lucky I’m not a social person

taladar,

Leaking it because someone they know personally asks? Sure. But the software side via social networks and other apps can absolutely be nailed down a lot more than it is.

ultratiem, (edited )
@ultratiem@lemmy.ca avatar

That’s just a fundamental problem with security. You can vault up your home but give your idiot brother in law a key and find the back door wide open, him drunk on the kitchen floor.

Prompts don’t work and aren’t really the right way to go because they are annoying and pretty cryptic as apps often assign a myriad of features to a single permission. Everyone’s just going to hit OK.

It’s a difficult issue to solve because there are so many edge cases. And fundamentally you can’t really control what others do with your number.

Honestly. I wish we started talking about doing away with phone numbers altogether. I feel tech is there. And it’s honestly such a massive fingerprint. I’ve had mine for 20 years ffs.

CoderKat, (edited )

Yeah. There’s literally nothing you can put on a prompt that will truly work. It’s still a good idea to prompt cause it will reduce how many people approve the prompt, but there is a significant number of people who don’t read prompts at all and just insta-confirm.

At best, I think you could design it so there’s no way for an app to request certain permissions themselves. They’d have to be opted in from the system settings and apps could only tell you how to do it. But that’s a usability nightmare that is quite frustrating for legitimate usages. There’s already some super sensitive permissions that do this. I think the ability to install apps, ability to display over other apps, and password managers for android.

tanja,

Their website is slickapp.co (without the m at the end), but their Android package name is com.slickapp.

Isn’t that a bit of an issue?
For example, when handling URLs?

biscat,

Don’t most Android packages begin with com. ?

Delation,
@Delation@mstdn.plus avatar
huginn,

Not really.

Android apps can declare which urls they accept as deep links. Once that is registered with the system (ie after install) then links of that type can be opened by the app. It doesn’t have to match the package name.

taladar,

The package name should, however, match a domain owned by the publisher of the package.

aniki,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • taladar,

    That is how Java names work. The whole domain-like appearance is meant to avoid name collisions between packages made by different companies.

    aniki,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • taladar,

    You are thinking of the standard library, I mean package names for third party code, specifically for what Java calls packages.

    docs.oracle.com/javase/…/namingpkgs.html

    LinkOpensChest_wav,

    My eyes!

    kautau,

    I feel like so many shit designs are just an extrapolation on what Dropbox did 6 years ago. Weirdly wide or narrow fonts, weirdly contrasting colors, etc

    blog.dropbox.com

    But this is just worse

    LinkOpensChest_wav,

    It makes those old geocities sites look tasteful by comparison

    lugal, in What the actual fuck?!

    Don’t keep us in suspense! What did they say? /s

    fastandcurious,

    ‘Nice glasses you wear’

    Please tell us your address so we can bring relevant offers and products straight to your doorstep

    ExtremeDullard,
    @ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    I know what you did last summer…

    Bwahaha! gotcha!

    ExtremeDullard, (edited ) in Privacy wars will be with us always. Let's set some rules
    @ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    The fight for privacy is not new, and it predates the internet by far.

    The problem is that, in the past, the state was on your side in the fight for privacy. Today, it sides with Big Tech and whoever offers it the most data to conduct its own privacy violations, or pays our elected officials the most.

    It’s a bit overwhelming when giant, unchecked and unaccountable monopolies and your own country, both with almost infinite resources and legal ways to do whatever they want with impunity, gang up on you at the same time.

    random65837, in What the actual fuck?!

    What kind of phone do you have? Do you use social media? Do you use the same email address everywhere? They don’t know anything you didn’t willingly give out. It’s not a random website, it’s a website that bought you via your browsing practices.

    CalicoJack,

    This is most likely something that someone else gave out, not OP. Some old school “friend” signed up for some app and shared their phone contacts, app proceeds to spam those contacts hoping for more sign-ups.

    random65837,

    The ol’ True Caller scam! Don’t forget all the people that add email addys to the phones contact list…and then give every app that asks for permissions full roam.

    But I’m “paranoid” because 90% of people only get my VoIP number and non important email.

    One an occupation or two when I know somebody really sucks I’ll give them a forwarder LOL.

    conspiracypentester, in What the actual fuck?!

    Looks like a great way to phising

    trash80, in What the actual fuck?!

    That is information that might be found on facebook or in your local newspaper.

    fastandcurious,

    I probably should’ve structured my post better but the bigger problem is them having my contact info

    FlyingSquid, in What the actual fuck?!
    @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

    This is why it’s good to be middle-aged. If anyone I know was described as my ‘friend in _____ school’ without naming them, I’d just assume it was someone I don’t remember anyway.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #