midwest.social

rez_doggie, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

How is this funny? It’s still religious doctrination. Oh I get it. Its a boomer catch phrase like “you couldn’t make this up”… Still not funny.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Its a pathetic liberal gotcha that fails to reconcile with the power of state government.

Either the sign goes up and some evangelicals vandalize it with impunity. Or the sign never goes up because school administrators don’t think the Texas AG will punish them for ignoring the law in this instance.

In this case, it doesn’t look like the flag was ever actually displayed.

Either way, evangelicals hold all the cards. Secular Liberals only manage to performatively protest in order to feel better.

Kuvwert, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

I’ve seen this before, but I’ve never been able to verify it as being real.

TheRaven,
@TheRaven@lemmy.ca avatar
wjrii,
@wjrii@kbin.social avatar

It was a legitimate protest of a stupid law that uses a legacy of inconsistent thought and limited perception to do an end run around the first amendment, but the text of the law requires a poster per building, so if they have enough in English, there would be no "need" to accept or post them. Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls, I certainly don't see why they couldn't use one of these or to flank the posters they do post with lots of context or more diverse ideas.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls

You don’t become a public school middle manager in Texas by showing balls. You’d get weeded out before you even got through the substitute program for teaching gym class.

MxM111, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)
@MxM111@kbin.social avatar

Black background would have been better.

HikingVet,

Rainbow

AngryCommieKender,

The law specified the background color.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Legalist authorization bureaucracies will hinge the draconian punishment for failing to hang a sign on the dye used to color fabric.

supert,

Or pink.

Techmaster, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Donate thousands of them to a single school

TheButtonJustSpins,

I think they made the rule that just the first one has to be displayed.

CookieJarObserver,
@CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works avatar

Then just change the background color

AngryCommieKender,

They specified the background color in the rules. The guy went about as far as you can go within the rules as written

CookieJarObserver,
@CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works avatar

Did it just say blue or this specific blue?

And then you could color the text :)

Noodle07,

We now have AI to create thousands of different ones

SpeedLimit55, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)
dragonflyteaparty,

And there’s tons of other schools who may not reject it. What exactly are you trying to say here with the single word “rejected” and a link?

SpeedLimit55,

It was rejected, sorry the meme wasn’t truly what you expected.

Staccato,

The way you present your message, it implies the effort was rejected statewide. That could be misleading some folks.

It was actually rejected by Carroll ISD, which is the school district covering the disproportionately white and wealthy suburb of Southlake, TX.

There are 1,021 more ISDs in Texas to go.

Syrc, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Rainbow background would’ve been the cherry on top

Thetimefarm,

I actually looked into this back when it was originally happening and the rules were fairly strict. It specified background color and wording but it didn’t give a language so this guy did about the best you could given the rules.

However it would be a shame if someone printed a poster with UV reactive paint that changed to something else over time while it hangs.

I_DONT_RAPE_KITTEHS, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

*“Not like that!”

imgonnatrythis, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Is there a translation for this headline? What the hell are they saying?

Anti_Weeb_Penguin, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Southern US moment

Candybar121,

(another) Texas moment

Trekman10, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)
@Trekman10@sh.itjust.works avatar

I’ve always thought that the upholding of these laws should instead result in quotes and “imagery” from Islam directly…or any non-Christian religion, really.

barttier, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)
@barttier@feddit.de avatar

Make poster: “In god we trust…”

Second line: “we pity fools”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #