It’s been getting safer overall for some time, despite everything that we see on the news. It has helped me to actually get out and talk to people I live near. It dispels the mistrust and fear that come with not knowing my neighbors.
There was a landmark study that showed no amount of alcohol is good for you just have it when you want it but justifying for health reasons seems silly
This is what I’ve been hoping, as my tastes have change. I’ve been finding myself liking thinner crusts, less cheese, maybe even things besides pepperoni, and I like being able to choose toppings, including veggies that still taste like veggies. I just spent big bucks on a pizza steel so hopefully that was a good investment, rather than a junk food investment
I’m sorry, beer is beer, whether micro or macro. Filtering is basically irrelevant to the kind of bacteria mentioned in the article, and plenty of craft beers are filtered in exactly the same way as commercial beers. And I say all this as someone who both enjoys beer and home brews it.
So, protip here: food is never inherently bad, because we’re omnivorous. We can eat a lot of things, what matter is a balance so we have all the necessary nutrients. That balance doesn’t need to be in one day, you can do it over the week.
There is some bad food still. The bad food is the overprocessed food. Soda beverages for example are mostly processed sugar and water, so you’ll only get energy out of it and no nutrients. Overly processed food is often this way : too much raw sugar or fat. You need the things around it for the nutrients.
See the NOVA ratings to know about how processed the food is. Basically, group 4 is the bad one and is the one to avoid.
Never. The nutriscore in Europe uses the nova ranking for its own ranking (more complete, better and simpler to use overall). But it’s not always on the packaging (it depends on the company, and some of them are firmly against giving good nutritional informations to the people).
It depends on your country, but the things that will kill you are usually banned by law.
Some food is associated with cancer. Salted meat for example is not cancerous by itself, but some complex interactions can create, momentarily, some dangerous molecules. Still, salted meat will not kill you by itself, it’s not a poison.
Regularity is what will be damaging. If you drink a lot of alcohol every day, every week, you will usually get cancer. If it’s occasionally, you’ll be fine. I see it as some sort of accumulation versus healing ability of the body. Don’t go over what your body can recover from, and you’ll be fine.
That’s why diversity is the ideal : the more diverse your meals are, the more likely you will have every nutrients you need and the less likely you will accumulate something that would become a problem. No need to be too hard on this either, if you don’t eat the same thing every day you’ll be fine usually.
It’s the D class of nova: usually food that had several, often industrial processing, before being recombined. You can see for yourself on Wikipedia for the correct English words and the correct definition.
Yet another article going "thing people like has this one good effect! (and we deliberately ignore the other bad effects)". The science equivalent of click bait.
The BBC revealed the sportspeople who are scoring big for the planet
We already have a quicker gender neutral method of referring to these people, it’s called athletes. Efficiency is a virtue and we don’t need to rename everything to be inclusive, just the exclusive things.
I get what you are saying here, but in this case you are mistaken. Are athletes sportspeople? Yes. But so are officials and broadcasters and coaches. There were awards for them as well.
You know, I wasn’t aware of that fact. I had always considered them to be either support staff (referees and commentators) or a part of the team (coach).
positive.news
Oldest