programming.dev

alcoholicorn, to memes in Appreciate all the content though

Who is that?

Lemmy.world ‘preemptively defederated Hexbear as a last resort’.

JDubbleu,

The Flying Squid is someone who contributes to Lemmy comment sections a ton. They’re super friendly and also add a lot of discussion. Given the nature of Lemmy being so small though they stand out because they’re often leading discussions. Pretty much just a really good discussion contributor who is super recognizable.

ModsAreCopsACAB,

Found the boot licker

tiny_electron, to programmer_humor in The Holy Trinity of JavaScript

This never gets old lmao

CJOtheReal, to programmer_humor in We're not the same! (period)

I don’t open it because there is more comment than code…

autokludge, (edited )
@autokludge@programming.dev avatar

\README.md

CJOtheReal,

Nah fuck that, thats bloat.

QuazarOmega,

Ah, another professional documentation writer, greetings!

cupcakezealot, to programmer_humor in GitHub Desktop or Git CLI?
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
Aatube,
@Aatube@kbin.social avatar

Any windows screenshots?

(Fork is also an awful name in terms of searching for it btw)

cupcakezealot,
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
caseyweederman,

You have my attention

Do they have a Linux client though?

cupcakezealot,
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

sadly no and i don’t think it works through wine

but technically they have a mac client which is basically an expensive version of linux

Aatube,
@Aatube@kbin.social avatar

Not really. It’s BSD, and even then the layout of the OS is quite far from BSD. Besides that you have a lot more technical stuff. Just use wine.

eluvatar,

Been using it for years it’s great

MiDaBa, to memes in 6÷2(1+2)

I would also add that you shouldn’t be using a basic calculator to solve multi part problems. Second, I haven’t seen a division sign used in a formal math class since elementary and possibly junior high. These things are almost always written as fractions which makes the logic easier to follow. The entire point of working in convention is so that results are reproducible. The real problem though is that these are not written to educate anyone. They are deliberately written to confuse so that some social media personality can make money from clicks. If someone really wants to practice math skip the click and head over to the Kahn Academy or something similar.

Pacmanlives, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Manager: This task only takes 30 minutes. Why did it take you the whole day?

git commit -m “changed somethings “

git push origin master

jelloeater85,
@jelloeater85@lemmy.world avatar

Do you always have to do origin master? I’ve seen it where sometimes just git push works and other times not.

Meowoem,

I think it depends what branch your local version of the repo is set to. If you’re already in master then it’ll push there, if you’re in a testing branch then you can push it straight to master instead by telling it to

jelloeater85,
@jelloeater85@lemmy.world avatar

I just meant it not auto creating a new matching named branch.

zcoyle,

where it Just Works, the branch is set up to track a remote branch

git-scm.com/book/…/Git-Branching-Remote-Branches

Valmond,

push origin your/branch

Pushes, you guessed it, your/branch!

Head is usually your checked out working branch if you’re not in a headless state, right?

sloppy_diffuser,
adrian783,

uh in any actual company you almost never push to origin master. so I think it’s a joke.

Valmond, (edited )

Depends on the configuration right?

You can work on your branch and then push that to integration for example.

I mean you’re not working on your local master/main branch right?

MajorHavoc,

Not with that attitude! /s

jelloeater85,
@jelloeater85@lemmy.world avatar

Force push Fridays!

TheUncannyObserver,

That’s part of the joke, I think. If it’s a repo more than just you use, you would almost never push directly to the main branch.

MajorHavoc,

You forgot this –force flag.

Valmond,

I’m too lazy, I use -f

captain_aggravated, to memes in 6÷2(1+2)
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

I think this speaks to why I have a total of 5 years of college and no degree.

Starting at about 7th grade, math class is taught to every single American school child as if they’re going to grow up to become mathematicians. Formal definitions, proofs, long sets of rules for how you manipulate squiggles to become other squiggles that you’re supposed to obey because that’s what the book says.

Early my 7th grade year, my teacher wrote a long string of numbers and operators on the board, something like 6 + 4 - 7 * 8 + 3 / 9. Then told us to work this problem and then say what we came up with. This divided us into two groups: Those who hadn’t learned Order of Operations on our own time who did (six plus four is ten, minus seven is three, times eight is 24, plus three is 27, divided by nine is three) Three, and who were then told we were wrong and stupid, and those who somehow had, who did (seven times eight is 56, three divided by nine is some tiny fraction…) got a very different number, and were told they were right. Terrible method of teaching, because it alienates the students who need to do the learning right off the bat. And this basically set the tone until I dropped out of college for the second time.

Evilsandwichman, to memes in 6÷2(1+2)

It’s about a 30min read

I’d love to help but I’ll wait for the tv miniseries

MrMobius, to memes in 6÷2(1+2)

Interesting, I didn’t know about strong implicit multiplication. So I would have said the result is 9. All along my studies in France, up to my physics courses at University, all my teachers used weak implicit multiplication. Could be it’s the norm in France, or they only use it in math studies at University.

sailingbythelee,

I didn’t know until now that I unconsciously use strong implicit multiplication (meaning that I get the answer “1”). I believe it happens more or less as a consequence of starting inside the parentheses and then working my way out.

It is a funny little bit of notational ambiguity, so it is funny that people get riled up about it.

wischi,

In a scientific context it’s actually very rare to run into that issue because divisions are mostly written as fractions which will completely mitigate the issue.

The strong implicit multiplication will only cause ambiguity after a division with inline notation. Once you use fractions the ambiguity vanishes.

In practice you also rarely see implicit multiplications between numbers but mostly between variables or variables and their coefficients.

MrMobius,

Yes of course, we always used fractions so there was no ambiguity. Last time I saw the division symbol must have been in primary school!

DRx, (edited )
@DRx@lemmy.world avatar

Def not a math major (BS/PharmD), but your explanation was like seeing through a visual illusion for the first time! lol

I was always taught PEMDAS growing up, and that the MD and the AS was read left to right in an equation like above. But stating the division as a fraction completely changes my mind now about how this calculation works. I think what would happen in a calculation I use every day if the former was used.

Example: Cockcroft-Gault Equation (estimation of renal function)

(140-age)(kg) / 72(SCr) vs (140-age) X kg ➗72 X SCr

In the first eq (correct one) an 80yo patient who weighs 65kg and has an SCr ~ 1.5 = 36.11

In the latter it = 81.25 (waaay too high for an 80yo lol)

edit: calculation variable

Samsy, (edited ) to memes in 6÷2(1+2)

I really hate the social media discussion about this. And the comments in the past teached me, there are two different ways of learning math in the world.

wischi, (edited )

True, and it’s not only about learning math but that there is actually no consensus even amongst experts, about the priority of implicit multiplications (without explicit multiplication sign). In the blog post there are a lot of things that try to show why and how that’s the case.

deegeese, to risa in Sneaking more Babylon 5 references into risa, please ignore

Was great fun watching her neg O’Brien’s engineering skills and then proposition him.

Zink,

I almost had to come back and reply to myself "and now she’s throwing herself at him, of course.”

mosiacmango,

“Pulling pigtails.”

stebo02, to memes in Because customers don't need to easily filter away some stuff from their searches
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

👊Hold up, buddy! 👊🤔Spotted your Gru’s Plan meme 🤔👉, but quick tip: ✌️Keep the text in the last two panels the same for that slick punchline! ✌️😂Consistency is the key to meme magic. 🗝️👌Give it a shot, and you’ll nail it! 👍😄

velvetThunder,

I don’t get the downvotes. You expressed that it differs from the usual meme formula but it’s very obvious that you aren’t serious. And it’s kinda funny reading the text whilst imagining those bullshit emojis. (At least I hope that the emojis weren’t serious)

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

yeah this kind of sarcastic post was a pretty common trope back in the day on r/copypasta, so I wanted to bring some of that back

Ghyste, to memes in This needs to be a well-defined psychological principle. I do stuff like this all the time

This isn’t even remotely close to being a meme.

can,

I agree but I think we’re a minority at this point.

Drusas,

Most memes on Lemmy seem not to be. I've given up complaining about it, aside from right now.

Ghyste,

People just dump any garbage because moderators are either non-existent or don’t care, and the bulk of the community mindlessly upvote literally any crap that gets posted here.

Meanwhile other communities lack content that these posts would be a proper fit for, and the same people supporting garbage posts here use that lack of activity in other communities as an excuse to continue the garbage posts here.

RedEyeFlightControl, to memes in This needs to be a well-defined psychological principle. I do stuff like this all the time
@RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world avatar

It is a well defined psychological principle called Pavlovian response.

JuicyGyri, (edited )

Probably closer to intermittent reward than Pavlovian conditioning! But yeah, definitely already “well defined” by psychology haha

RedEyeFlightControl,
@RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world avatar

I would suggest that the stimulus was strong enough to condition after one trial, due to the repeat behavior.

Hubi, to memes in Skyrimposting

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • NocturnalMorning,

    Hopefully nowhere

    TIMMAY,

    hopefully now, here???

    PsychedSy,

    I mean I can prolly only find fentanyl but you can cashapp me. I have a friend that would prolly be able to safely do the injections and I know when ff11 came out I stayed up all night playing wolf:et and then I drove to get my preorder I thought leaves blowing across the road were 'nades so there’s precedent that my brain can fuck up the way we want.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #