cryptix,

Build more spikes

IHadTwoCows,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • praise_idleness,

    Can you discuss it somewhere else please?

    Mark132012,

    Both can improve.

    riodoro1,

    But one is uncountably better in uncountable ways.

    American_Communist22,
    @American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml avatar

    i think we did just fine

    MissJinx, (edited )
    @MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

    Hey OP, comunistm is great on paper because it doesn’t take into consideration the human nature. Humans are corruptible, no matter who, and even the best of us would be corrupted when it comes to someone they love. This alone breaks the comunist stance because you can’t have fairness when one human is responsable for managing/governing. Comunism would work if there was no hierarchy between humans, no one more powerful. Maybe if some aliens come or if some AI evolve enough to govern, but that’s is not today’s world

    Edit: I do think the US level of captalism is horrible. Maybe begin with just SOME socialist policies, like free healthcare and univesities, that would already improve so much the lifes of americans

    seitanic,
    @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    Humans are corruptible, no matter who, and even the best of us would be corrupted when it comes to someone they love.

    Agreed! That’s why I think it would be better if the workers ran things, instead of a few corrupt CEOs.

    Grayox,
    @Grayox@lemmy.ml avatar

    Hey Commenter, it sounds like you only have a surface level understanding of Communism, i suggest you read some theory. Communism very much takes human greed into account, its kind of its whole point.

    MissJinx, (edited )
    @MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

    You are right I really don’t, but not all theory translates well into reality. How would a country of milions manage all that without hierarchy? I’m not going against you I’m just trying to understand how would this work without a dictatorship and considering that humans are not trustworthy

    KrasMazov, (edited )
    @KrasMazov@lemmygrad.ml avatar

    You seem to be at least a little bit interested, I suggest you watch some videos on youtube so you understand it better, the channel Second Thought would be a good place to start.

    I’ll try to answer your concerns below:

    The current ideology of society is the ideology of its rulling class.

    Human nature, if anything is much more about collaboration and collective effort than greed, that’s how it has been for most of human history.

    That is to say, we precisely see so much greed everywhere because we live in a system that heavily incentivizes individuality and greed. From the way we are taught to the media we consume, it’s literally everywhere. We are heavily influenced to think and see things in this particular individualistic way.

    A society that puts human needs and collective effort above profits have a different way of viewing and interacting with the world than the way we do in capitalist societies. Besides that, if your concern is people abusing power, there should be mechanisms in place to account for that.

    My knowledge on this whole topic is not deep, but I guess something you could look up is democratic centralism to understand how hierarchy works in a marxist-leninist socialist state.

    Also, my understanding is that marxist theory is only dogmatic in relation to it’s method, as everything else about it adapts to the reality and the material conditions of the time and place it is to be put into practice.

    badcommandorfilename,

    … one human is responsable for managing/governing.

    This is the definition of a dictatorship, not communism

    MissJinx,
    @MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

    True, also the only exemple of comunism ever

    badcommandorfilename,

    I don’t think that adding capitalism to dictatorships improves anything though.

    Communism/Capitalism/Socialism = Economic Ideas

    Dictatorship/Monarchy/Democracy = Political Systems

    AngryCommieKender,

    you can’t have fairness when one human is responsable for managing/governing.

    I would say that you have left your society and government open to the inevitably of corruption when you place the power in one person’s hands. I’ve been advocating for elected councils to run the system. It’s not impossible to corrupt an elected council, one needs look no further than the US Congress, or whatever they call the CCP massive room of people. I would propose that just having a council is not enough, one also needs to have a more robust voting system such as Ranked Choice Voting, or another runoff system so that you don’t end up with a choice between two shit sandwiches. We also need to abolish policing, as it is currently done, as a career. I’m not certain how to fix this one, and perhaps we can’t without actual incorruptible androids and AI.

    The real issue is that we the people have tried to implement these changes only for the rich old fossils to refuse the will of the people. Just look at what is happening with Measure 1&2 in Ohio.

    MissJinx, (edited )
    @MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

    I don’t think there is an imediate solution. Humams can not be trusted with power, it’s human nature. I see only 2 ways, either someone/thing else does it or, a more realistic one, technology becomes so powerful that we can manage the managers, monitoring their actions/choices (and voting?! maybe?!) Idk, but remember that tech is a sword and not a knife, if it monitors them.they would also monitor us.

    Anyway there is no simple solution. Captalism as is today and comunism as is today are both bad options.

    andrew_bidlaw,
    @andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works avatar

    You know a lot of soviet buildings was built by prison labor? Let’s make a next meme about egyptian pyramids. They look great too.

    Stalins_Spoon,
    @Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml avatar
    
    <span style="color:#323232;">citation needed
    </span>
    
    AngryCommieKender,

    Way more shit is done with prison labor in the US. I guarantee. We have 25% of the prison population of the world, and the USSR had a tendency to send a massive amount of their prisoners to Siberia, which would make it difficult to help build apartment blocks several thousand miles away.

    andrew_bidlaw, (edited )
    @andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works avatar

    What’s with that whataboutism? I don’t care about the US. Why do your type brings it up every time, like it makes USSR’s wrongdoings more acceptable. It doesn’t. It’s rather a lesson to learn and not repeat in your country.

    and the USSR had a tendency to send a massive amount of their prisoners to Siberia, which would make it difficult to help build apartment blocks several thousand miles away.

    So? They built infrastructure there, yes, so it’s enormous territory can be somehow crossable. And they also built infrastructure, housing and plants\factories all over it’s territory. Gulag wasn’t just a one small camp, it’s the Main Office of Camp (Managenent), it had a lot of people to send elsewhere, based on what Kremlin wants.

    greenmarty,

    This is indeed correct but it had dark side, like taking away people’s business or limited freedom of speech.

    wrinkletip,

    No, that is unrelated.

    OurToothbrush,

    Taking away people’s businesses is a good thing actually, and free speech doesn’t exist in capitalist cultures either, anything threatening the regime will be dealt with. Capitalism just has a wider range of things you can say that aren’t threatening because it has a more stable hegemony for now due to its historical position.

    greenmarty,

    Nah it’s not, taking away people believe they can built something made most people dull factory workers and those who were extra regime supportive were put in the post to build something but they often didn’t have the abilities . It’s hard to put it into words but you couldn’t have just make startup with nee awesome idea because people in the posts would not let you unless it meant increasing quota.

    OurToothbrush,

    , taking away people believe they can built something made most people dull factory workers

    Workers do not see the full fruits of their labor under capitalism, that is right! When worker self management in Catalonia started, factory output increased by 30 percent over the course of a month. :)

    greenmarty, (edited )

    Yep so many people who could have come up with many innovations were deprived of the chance under communism. Nothing against factory workers btw.

    seitanic,
    @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    Fortunately, it isn’t a package deal. You can give people homes without taking away their rights.

    greenmarty,

    Definetly, but not under the regime that built those used as reference.

    Rubezahl, (edited )

    Well, I hate mmunism as much as the next Eastern European but this is absolutely true. Commie blocks rule.

    RememberTheApollo_,

    TBF the communist solution is for homes in general, not just homelessness.

    Sagar,

    Now that is what I call a truely amazing meme for showing the amazing capitalism abilities!

    TCB13,
    @TCB13@lemmy.world avatar

    Too bad that to have homelessness in the first place you usually require communists doing their communist shit.

    Cowbee,

    Did the tents come from famous US communists?

    lolcatnip,

    Right, there are no homeless people in America. Those people I see sleeping on the street just really enjoy urban camping!

    Numenor,
    AI_toothbrush,

    I have no problem with communism(i think socdem is a better system but thats a discussion for another day) but the moment a tankie here mentions anything about the soviet union being better than capitalism just look up holodomor.

    xor,

    in columbia they use flamethrowers on the homeless that live in the sewers…

    wowwoweowza,

    Detroit tried this. It didn’t work.

    khoi,

    🤔

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #