knexcar,

Why would I read a long, padded, ad-riddled article when I can get a quick and accurate TL;DR in the title and expert commentary in the comments?

TheFriar,

Welcome to he internet.

TengoHipo,

I want peoples opinions on what they read. I ain’t got time lol

lorty,
@lorty@lemmy.ml avatar

Maybe give us a not paywalled link next time?

AgentGrimstone,

YUP. So make sure your title is good.

june,

This is literally the entire internet.

ElPussyKangaroo,

So, what’s the meme about?

yamanii,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

:)

capital,

[insert question directly answered by article here]

vsis,
@vsis@feddit.cl avatar

If it’s paywalled, yes. I’m just reading the title.

KeenFlame,

Why would I risk my psyche, phone, and integrity going to a infested wild media web page, it’s like you think this is reddit and I’m a curious teen

KrokanteBamischijf,

Not necessarily a bad thing though.

Think of it this way: There’s value in having access to a list of curated content others have deemed “worth reading or looking at”. But there is just as much value in engaging in some banter, provided it doesn’t lead to outright war in the comments.

I admit, it is tiresome trying to seriously discuss a topic when people haven’t actually read the article, but there is still an upside to a topic triggering at least enough interest to where people actually want to engage.

KingThrillgore,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

I feel personally attacked

prunerye,

Give me an archive link and I’ll click it every time. Otherwise, almost never.

F4rtEmp3r0r,
@F4rtEmp3r0r@lemmy.ca avatar

I thought it was standard operating procedure on the Internet.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #