@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

CarbonIceDragon

@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

CarbonIceDragon,
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

My Stellaris empires always end up starting more like the vulcans with a focus on science and mostly peaceful exploration, and end up a society of soul-crushing academia that will compromise their own sanity, values and safety for any chance at powerful or dangerous knowledge, ruling over a collection of random protectorates that they maintain for little reason other than diplomatic influence and to have someone to lord their vastly supervisor tech over.

CarbonIceDragon,
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

Maybe? I’m not really familiar enough with them to know

CarbonIceDragon,
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

Far less friendly, aliens in my empires tend to get marginalized to basic resource planets and banned from growing their population because my primary species is more optimized for research output. Also my most common ascension path is bio-ascension, which federation humans would find very illegal since it’s primarily genetic augmentation.

CarbonIceDragon,
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

I mean, isn’t the entire concept of the Fermi paradox that given the universe is so large and old, it seems surprising that we see no signs of aliens anywhere, and therefore some explanation must exist for why we have not? That’s more focused on intelligent life than extraterrestrial life of any sort I suppose, but given it’s even named a paradox in the first place, someone must find it surprising

CarbonIceDragon,
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

Science and Philosophy might not be exactly the same thing, but there is a lot of overlap, and a lot of people who do both.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #