Guenther_Amanita

@Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

I wanted to make the same suggestion with uBlue. There’s also the silverblue-main image, which is very vanilla and the one I use. The kmod is already pre-installed there.

Bazzite can also be great, but it’s too opinionated for my taste. I like Silverblue also more like the devs intended.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

First - post upvoted because of the detailled report. Helpful. Thanks!


I’ve had the same problem a longer while ago.

Do you really have this few games in your library? I haven’t used the normal Steam mode for a while, but on your game list is a small Penguin. I believe that’s due to the filter “show Linux native only”.
If you forgot to activate Proton, go into the Steam settings, gameplay and hit the checkbox “Compatibility for other games”. Use that all the time, even for Linux native games. They are usually way buggier than the Windows version, and Proton works great today.


Second, if you are already using Proton and my first guess is wrong, use another Proton version. Either the most recent one (proton-experimental), an older one or the “proton-GE” versions.


What distro are you using?

Did you try using Flatpak instead of the native package? Maybe, there’s something missing in the native app.

Oh, and I also wouldn’t worry much about the firmware errors and such. This panel is very new and some things are basically impossible to archive. But don’t trust my statement, maybe I’m wrong.

Guenther_Amanita,

Fedora Atomic (Silverblue, etc.), with either KDE or Gnome.

Both look modern and should work on the hardware, and no customer can fuck it up

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

There are a few different ways:

  • VM: doesn’t give you the “real” experience. Often feels sluggish.
  • Installation via package manager: really clutters and messes up your system. There are many dependencies, and then you’ll have 5 different file managers for example.
  • Ventoy: the second best option, or the best, if you just wanna take a look at each. If you really want to try the DE for a few days, it isn’t suited of course.
  • Fedora Atomic (immutable variants like Silverblue): there’s a project called uBlue, that provides images for all DEs. You can install the vanilla Silverblue, and then rebase to each according image. Your custom installed programs and personal data stay intact, but everything else gets swapped out cleanly. Each rebase would take ~5 minutes and one reboot, but it feels like you reinstalled your OS and changed the flavor.
Guenther_Amanita,

I don’t understand the downvotes.

This isn’t only an app issue, it’s the implementation in Mutter.

On KDE for example, I’ve set 150% fractional scaling, and all apps look sharp.

I was really hyped when the recent update introduced “proper” fractional scaling, and was bummed when I noticed it didn’t work in many of my apps, especially Electron ones.

Guenther_Amanita,

I felt the same when I started using Linux.
My whole computing experience was on Windows, and when I switched, I expected Linux to be working the same and being a 1:1 replacement.

Just don’t expect it to be the same.
Even if it sometimes looks like it (e.g. Mint oder KDE-based distros) it absolutely isn’t similar.

People don’t have the same expectations on MacOS, so why should we on Linux?

And if you really don’t like it at all, then stay on Windows. No shame at all. Use the right tool for the right task.

Guenther_Amanita,

Wow! Is it really this easy? Awesome, I’ll look into it, thanks!

Guenther_Amanita,

Did you try the Flatpak version or packages of other distros (like Fedora) via Distrobox?

You probably installed it on your Manjaro install via pacman, did you?

Linux working in one monitor but not in the other

So, yesterday I was trying to install Fedora on a PC with an Nvidia graphics card, it is a bit old and it has an Intel CPU. Basically as soon as I booted the USB it went all weird like if it would be having a graphical glitch like going all rainbow in some parts and stop responding, I tried a few more times under a UEFI secure...

Guenther_Amanita,

+1 for uBlue. Everything comes installed ootb and just works without getting in your way

Guenther_Amanita,

Use anything you want. All distros should support those packages, use what you’re the most comfortable with.

I personally would recommend Fedora Silverblue/ it’s other atomic variants or uBlue especially.
It’s pretty much unbreakable, modern and supports ALL distros’ package managers through Distrobox. It’s also pretty simple in my opinion, since you pretty much don’t have to worry about traditional package management.

I think you’re searching something reliable and simple, so this would be a solid choice.

Mint would be great too

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

Mint is the most mentioned choice and an extremely great beginner distro with an huge community.

ZorinOS will get a big update very soon and is also a very good choice. It was my first distro, especially because it looks very modern and pleasing.

If you’re a tiny bit more advanced and get the basics, then you might take a look at the immutable Fedora variants like Silverblue.

They have many advantages compared to traditional distros like the two mentioned above, but atomic Linux is a relatively new concept. I also find them easier to understand and use, and, imo, they’re even more user friendly, but not as refined.

Firefox PiP doesn't stay on top in GNOME

I am using fedora silverblue and in the native version of Firefox, the picture in picture window does not have always on top enabled. Is there anyway to change a setting such that always on top is enabled by default. I know it is supported on gnome+fedora because the flatpak version(I downloaded to test this behaviour) has this...

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

+1 from my side for universal-blue.org, where Bazzite is part of.

@Ultimatenab I often see Garuda and other distros like those appealing to newcomers, because they come themed ootb and look fancy af. Don’t forget that you can get every tweak of that by just installing a theme, which is a matter of seconds.

Garuda is based on Arch, which is known to be not as highly noob friendly as some others.

For “normal” users like us especially, who just want to game and do other normie stuff, the immutable Fedora variants are excellent. uBlue fixes some of their minor issues, and they run wonderfully.

They work just how Linux should do it as desktop OS imo, and how other non-Linux-OSs should supposed to be too.

Also, there will soon come a time where you begin Distro-hopping and reinstall your OS every weekend. On immutable Fedora, you can change your DE (the GUI/ desktop environment, which often defines the distro) with one command cleanly and switch from KDE to Gnome for example, which feels like a clean reinstall, but keeps your data and config.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

You can always use Fedora Atomic with an Arch Distrobox.

Silverblue and the Arch container update themself, and you can always enjoy your Arch CLI if you want :) I wouldn’t say Arch is unreliable, but it won’t intervene if you do something stupid.
SB on the other hand is almost unbrickable and extremely low maintenance, which I like a lot.

But if you did your research and enjoy Arch/ it’s derivatives, then have fun! Arch is great and if it suits your taste, then that’s wonderful! 😊

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

I wouldn’t use CentOS for private/ desktop stuff personally.

Do you really need its features? Afaik, the “security” features you mentioned are mainly for server use. At least that’s what I have in my mind right now when I researched possible candidates for my home server some time ago.

I think sticking with a “home use” distro would suit you better.


There are a few options as suggestions:

  1. Stay on Kinoite
    ==================

There’s barely any configuration drift compared to the mutable Fedora. Therefore, it should be less buggy.

Fedora Atomic KDE gave me the best Plasma experience yet. I often tested KDE (I’m a Gnome guy myself, but here and there hop to KDE for a few months) and on most installs on other distros like Suse/ Workstation/ Debian, it got more and more buggy after a few weeks due to updates and tweaks.
So, bugfixes often didn’t apply to my system, only the default one or the install from the devs.

I find Fedora’s release schedule to be the perfect sweetspot between reliable, stable and up to date.

If you’re really impatient, you can always switch to the nightly builds (on Atomic), which are more bug prone and rolling. Maybe, Plasma will be stable enough before it hits the official image. But you should keep at least one stable image in your bootloader.

  1. Debian and Leap
    ==================

Debian “just” got it’s new release and will be stale for the next years. BUT, many of those Plasma 6 bug fixes will be backported to 5.27. Still, many of the QOL-changes are 6-exclusive.

OpenSuse Leap also gives you a great KDE experience and is pretty similar to Debian, both in release schedule and when the last big update hit.

  1. Distrobox
    ============

You can use an Arch/ Tumbleweed container on Debian/ slow release distro to get all the newest KDE stuff on the outside and keep your stable base beneath.

Why? Because, in my experience, Plasma only gets more refined each update. As long as there aren’t any new big features, there are about hundred bugs resolved weekly.

Or, you can do the opposite. Use something newer, like TW, Slowroll, Sid(uction) or Arch, to get the newest software under the hood, and use the Debian repo to get a stable DE.

Just what you prefer.

In your case, I’d settle with Fedora (mutable or Atomic, in your case the Kinoite version, as I’d prefer that one too), and just don’t upgrade to the newest version.
The older version is always supported for a year or two, and you don’t have to upgrade each release. The bug fixes always get backported if possible.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

Neither of both.

Both are more on the tinkerer-side, and for university you need something reliable and easy to use in my eyes.

And that might be Fedora Silverblue/ Atomic (or universal-blue.org to be more precise for QOL-tweaks).
It is definitely more simple, stable (release cycle) and also more reliable, since there’s only one base (Fedora packages + your DE), and therefore less configuration variability.

I’d also lose access to the AUR

No, you wouldn’t. Neither on Nix, nor on Fedora Atomic. Especially on Silverblue you layer and containerise a lot, and you can always use the pre-installed and self updating Distrobox to install Arch and use the AUR. That’s also what I do, and it works fine, even though I almost never feel the urge to use it.

Guenther_Amanita,

Yeah, of course. You’re right.

Nix is kind-of-immutable, and you can always roll back to your old build if necessary.

But Arch on the other hand is notorious to “just break” if you don’t exactly know what you’re doing. Of course it will work perfectly reliable (apart from the few paper cuts you get when using bleeding edge stuff) if you are experienced, and optimally, if you set it up with BTRFS and Snapper/ Timeshift.

But honestly, unpopular opinion, I absolutely see no reason to use Arch today. The only exception is the DIY-aspect, which I totally understand and respect. But, for every other use case, there are better options out there, may it be Tumbleweed or Nix for a rolling release, Arch in Distrobox on Silverblue, whatever. It sounds like way too much effort for what I would get. But each to their own.

Guenther_Amanita,

Safe in the context of someone stealing the hard drive and look through private photos and stuff by plugging the drive into another device.

Guenther_Amanita,

Well… shit. Thank you for your great advice. I’m gonna look for how I can secure my data.

Guenther_Amanita,

Thanks a lot for your answer. How would you encrypt a server? Typing a password every time it boots isn’t possible for me, since I would need a monitor for my headless server.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

Wtf, no?!

If I had CP, I wouldn’t ask publicly and make myself vulnerable.

I just don’t wanna have anyone snooping around my stuff, just as everyone else.

Guenther_Amanita,

My threat model isn’t high. Just normal stuff everyone has, but that would be disadvantagely if someone else got them.

It’s more if a precautionary measure. It doesn’t have to be super safe, but better than nothing.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

Crosspost. Click on it and you’ll land on my original post.

I didn’t want to duplicate it. You can always suggest me how to make the crosspost more visible, I just did it how my client set it up for me.

Guenther_Amanita,

I had the expection that Linux is already set up as a multi-user environment and has that feature built in.

Of course that “isolation” of data, as I had it in my mind, wouldn’t be really secure, but it doesn’t have to be that for me. I just don’t want anyone to access it easily.

Guenther_Amanita, (edited )

I’ve had quite a bad experience with police for example.

30 cops raided my home because of something trivial (I ordered a bit of non-psychoactive CBD-weed, which is, even in the most restrictive country you can imagine, ridiculous).

Of course, I got the whole experience-pack, including strip searches and confiscating all electronics.

Even though I believe them getting hold of any data wouldn’t have changed much, I’m still glad I had my devices encrypted.

Just knowing they didn’t see my cringy pictures of my teeny-me, where I discovered Snapchat filters, is a big relief. 😅

Yeah… that traumatized me a bit and maybe that’s the reason I’m worrying.

Also, you could never know what will happen in the future. Maybe my GF will turn crazy tomorrow and use those embarrassing pictures against me. Who knows?

I believe everyone should use encryption, even if they don’t have much to hide…

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #