Moneo

@Moneo@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Moneo,

The Netherlands did it in the 70s and plenty of cities are progressively doing it. All you’re saying is, “we fucked our cities up, guess the only way forward is to double down.”

Moneo,

90% of north Americans live in towns or cities. And no you don’t need a large population to support public transportation, here are hundreds of examples in Europe.

Moneo,

Plenty of towns that size are served well by public transportation in Europe.

Moneo,

No in practice actually.

Moneo,

100% agree please don’t attribute this person’s comments with the urbanist movement.

Urbanists want cities & towns to be better places to live for everyone, we want to improve the finances of towns and people, we want to improve the health & quality of life of the average person. Urbanists do not hate anyone’s way of life or want to force them to live differently.

Moneo,

Change happens iteratively. The first step is to acknowledge the problem and adjust how future development is planned. Start with the town center and move outward from there. Giving up fixes nothing.

Moneo,

90% of Americans live in cities or towns, the percentage that aren’t driven to school is much much lower.

Moneo,

No I thought they built highways because they wanted the most inefficient and expensive way to get around.

Moneo,

My point is everyone is talking about how great this is for wildlife but there’s no way they would build this if only the wildlife were benefitting from it.

Moneo,

Oh wow I didn’t know new jersey had rail and walkable streets

Moneo,

Loool gottem

Moneo,

The worst part about mam is that I feel useless because I consume way more than I contribute.

Moneo,

Yeah I know, but I wanna see that uploaded counter go up and it never does. Also I mostly torrent audiobooks and I don’t have much hd space

Moneo,

But why does it matter? In Dune characters are able use mindfulness to control their body so finely that they can manipulate molecules. So there’s a “scientific explanation” but for all intents and purposes it’s magic.

I don’t understand the need to draw hard lines, the fantasy/sci Fi distinction has always just been a way to describe the setting moreso than the genre. Many fantasy novels read like a typical sci-fi and vice versa.

Moneo,

I feel like you mentioning Spock/elves just highlights how similar the two genres are. Sci-Fi (in theory) uses a future universe as a setting in which to explore characters/themes. Fantasy uses a fictional universe as a setting in which to explore characters/themes.

Preferring one to the other feels pedantic. Is Dune sci-fi or fantasy? Does it matter? I say no. Grumpy rant/

Moneo,

Hard agree. There’s sci-fi/fantasy settings and then there’s sci-fi/fantasy writing. Star wars is a fantasy story that takes place in a sci-fi setting, if you’re so inclined. But it’s hard fantasy in my books.

If your book is focused on adventure and characters it’s probably fantasy, if your book is focused on humanity or other grander themes it’s probably sci-fi. Focusing on whether there is magic or elves or whatever is completely missing the point in my opinion.

The whole debate is childish. If you refuse to read a book because there is X race or X technology or whatever then you really need to change your priorities.

It’s like when people say “I don’t watch cartoons”. Fuck off!!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #