@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

SnotFlickerman

@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

SnotFlickerman, (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

For what its worth, it seems like the board is claiming that Altman’s constant wheeling and dealing of the technology, including giving Microsoft a minority stake in the LLC, rubbed them the wrong way, and they felt that his increasingly transparent desire for profits was antithetical to the original purpose of the OpenAI Non-Profit, which was to safeguard AGI, not to market and sell it.

Honestly, I felt that way too, so I’m on the boards side with this one. It felt pretty clear that Altman had tossed out the “beneficial for humanity” goal in favor of “beneficial to me and my wallet.”

SnotFlickerman,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/befa47b0-6d0d-42c7-8759-bace9b31fd3a.jpeg

SnotFlickerman, (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Data’s version of A Christmas Carol.

He is visited by the ghosts of Steve Wozniak, Linus Torvalds, and Richard Stallman, all telling Data that he must “Open Source” his code.

I’d smoke a blunt after an experience like that, too.

SnotFlickerman,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

We live in the darkest timeline.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #