@demesisx@infosec.pub
@demesisx@infosec.pub avatar

demesisx

@demesisx@infosec.pub

Plutus, Haskell, Nix, Purescript, Swift/Kotlin. laser-focused on FP: formality, purity, and totality; repulsed by pragmatic, unsafe, “move fast and break things” approaches

AC24 1DE5 AE92 3B37 E584 02BA AAF9 795E 393B 4DA0

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

demesisx, (edited )
@demesisx@infosec.pub avatar

I’m not pointing to a problem per se. I’m just saying that this dev dismissed the act of building this from scratch as impossible when it is not actually impossible. Honestly, I’m just trying to spread the word about Nix and GUIX because they make things that were previously considered impossible (like this) possible.

demesisx,
@demesisx@infosec.pub avatar

Interestingly enough, someone actually did release two nix derivations for this software!

search.nixos.org/packages?channel=23.05&show=…

demesisx,
@demesisx@infosec.pub avatar

Looks like they have no idea how to get their software working using Nix. The following blurb is absurd to most GUIX or Nix users:

NOTE: In most cases, end users should never compile fwupd from scratch; it’s a complicated project with dozens of dependencies (and as many configuration options) and there’s just too many things that can go wrong.

Users should just have fwupd installed and updated by their distro, managed and tested by the package maintainer. The distribution will have also done some testing with how fwupd interacts with other software on your system, for instance using GNOME Software.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #