The ancient Egyptians utilized neither wheels nor work animals for the majority of the pyramid-building era, so the giant blocks, weighing 2.5 tons on average, had to be moved through human muscle power alone. But until recently, nobody really knew how. The answer, it seems, is simply water. Evidence suggests that the blocks were first levered onto wooden sleds and then hauled up ramps made of sand. However, dry sand piles up in front of a moving sled, increasing friction until the sled is nearly impossible to pull. Wet sand reduces friction dramatically beneath the sled runners, eliminating the sand piles and making it possible for a team of people to move massive objects.
I’m aware but I don’t care too much lol. It’s helped me quite a bit and you don’t want to see the alternative. I have enough trouble expressing myself, I’ll take the help as I can get it.
“Hypnosis – state of extreme relaxation and inner focus in which a person is unusually responsive to suggestions made by the hypnotist. The modern practice has its roots in the idea of animal magnetism, or mesmerism, originated by Franz Mesmer.[443] Mesmer’s explanations were thoroughly discredited, and to this day there is no agreement amongst researchers whether hypnosis is a real phenomenon, or merely a form of participatory role-enactment.[272][444][445] Some aspects of suggestion have been clinically useful.[446][447] Other claimed uses of hypnosis more clearly fall within the area of pseudoscience. Such areas include the use of hypnotic regression, including past life regression.[448]”
Some aspects of mythology or alchemy are also useful, but that doesn’t mean it’s an overall respected science or isn’t caused by a secondary phenomenon. As that wiki states, it’s the suggestion aspect that is useful, not the hypnosis itself (the methodology) and there isn’t really a consensus on its efficacy.
The statement “If it’s useful for anything, then it’s not pseudoscience” is an example of a logical fallacy known as a false dichotomy or a false dilemma. This fallacy occurs when someone presents a situation as if there are only two mutually exclusive options or possibilities when, in fact, there are more potential alternatives or nuances to consider.
In this case, the statement implies that something can either be “useful” or “pseudoscience,” with no middle ground or other possibilities. In reality, an idea or concept can have some utility or practical applications while still being considered pseudoscientific or lacking scientific validity. The two categories are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and this oversimplified dichotomy ignores the complexity of the subject matter.
This is basically part of the joke that this headline implies.
If I was smarter, I'd have gotten the bag. (mander.xyz)
polycoria (mander.xyz)
There exists a hacker with an inordinate fondness for beetles (sh.itjust.works)
Hey Evolution, can I have an oxygen transporter for my red blood cells?...
the fuckgraph (mander.xyz)
researchgate.net/…/245634594_Chains_of_Affection_…...
Google “search” (lemmy.world)
Me too (mander.xyz)
And this is why I no longer have cable. (lemmy.world)
Let's meet those headlines (mander.xyz)
aLiEnS!!1 (mander.xyz)
Pleistocene Crash Course (mander.xyz)
I'll do it tomorrow I swear (lemmy.world)
All is fair in love and war. (See body for part 2) (mander.xyz)
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/1430a6bb-ad83-49cc-9fa3-3dbbff896886.png
It's (usually) already installed (lemmy.ml)
I didn’t plan this far ahead (lemmy.world)
$1 grilled cheese (mander.xyz)
I just want to do some funny Python stuff man (discuss.tchncs.de)
bro pls (mander.xyz)
Hypnotism-Administered Placebo Treatment for Susceptible Populations Suffering from Existential Dread (mander.xyz)
jabde.com/2023/10/22/placebos-using-hypnosis/