@kogasa@programming.dev
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

kogasa

@kogasa@programming.dev

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

8h work

except for the ~hour lunch where you can’t really go home anyway, and the ~hour commute, and the ~hour it takes to get ready and decompress after getting home

8 hour workday has always been ~11 hours commitment per day for me

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Because it’s pizza

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

ASD coded, not literally ASD. The thematic struggle with social convention counts IMO. But Data has no self loathing or whatever. He just wants to understand. We stan Data.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

This is how you get buffer files everywhere

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Graceful degradation. We can all learn from its example.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

'pass

Pronounced “piss”

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Error 404 nginx unmatched route page gang

kogasa, (edited )
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

It’s not ambiguous, it’s just that correctly parsing the expression requires more precise application of the order of operations than is typical. It’s unclear, sure. Implicit multiplication having higher precedence is intuitive, sure, but not part of the standard as-written order of operations.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

My opinion hasn’t changed. The standard order of operations is as well defined as a notational convention can be. It’s not necessarily followed strictly in practice, but it’s easier to view such examples as normal deviation from the rules instead of an implicit disagreement about the rules themselves. For example, I know how to “properly” capitalize my sentences too, and I intentionally do it “wrong” all the time. To an outsider claiming my capitalization is incorrect, I don’t say “I am using a different standard,” I just say “Yes, I know, I don’t care.” This is simpler because it accepts the common knowledge of the “normal” rules and communicates a specific intent to deviate. The alternative is to try to invent a new set of ad hoc rules that justify my side, and explain why these rules are equally valid to the ones we both know and understand.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

There aren’t.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

I have a masters in math and I have no fucking idea what a second course in “advanced trigonometry” looks like much less a fifth

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Well, he’s “wil” on Reddit. I imagine he’d have a “public” account here too even if he prefers a private alt.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Pepe is SUPER racist. Peepo is kinda just doin his best.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Step 1: Install a Wayland compositor of your choice Step 2:

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

TFVS

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

docs.github.com/…/resolving-a-merge-conflict-usin…

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

It’s dynamic :)

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

What is ridiculously difficult to understand?

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

No. They’re just not publicly saying it’s off the table. Whether they’re entertaining it internally is a totally different question.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Okay? Is this supposed to change something?

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

How does the opinion of your supposed internal contact at mozilla affect the basic English interpretation of the public announcement?

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

Fair point. I would say on a personal level that GitHub actions is quite nice to use, especially with the marketplace. But I’d be surprised if switching version controls also entailed a CI/CD change for Mozilla, so I can’t think of a good reason.

kogasa, (edited )
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

You’re quite the lunatic. I’m obviously not defending GitHub PRs, or saying Mozilla should or should not use them. I said “we are not open to PRs at this time” is not the same as “we will be open to PRs in the future.” The truth of that statement has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not Mozilla is, in fact, open to using PRs in the future. But there’s no point in telling you that, because you’re clearly unhinged. Have a good life.

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

That is not what that means

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

And Star Trek and Star Wars and probably Galaxy Quest

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #