Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in When/how do you think capitalism will be defeated?

I mostly agree with this. But I can imagine saying basically any system minus x core feature will go to shit.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, (edited ) to asklemmy in When/how do you think capitalism will be defeated?

I think you can say that’s immoral. I’m not sure you can say it will destroy the whole system or that this is an inevitability of any capitalist system.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in When/how do you think capitalism will be defeated?

What are some examples of capitalism destroying itself?

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to selfhosted in What's the point of a reverse proxy and does cloudflare give all the benefits of one?

Depends what you mean by same port. A reverse proxy would allow you to expose everything of 443 and then the proxy would route to particular app ports and hosts.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in What if reddit joins race of services joing fediverse?

Never going to happen. They’ve been going the total opposite direction for a long time

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, (edited ) to asklemmy in What are your best flight tips and tricks?

You will be in close quarters with a lot of people. People suck and will be inconsiderate fucks. Airlines are shit and have you by the balls in terms of delays and shitty service.

Go in with low expectations and don’t make yourself more miserable by getting upset about it

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in What's the best gaming console and why?

This is how I feel about everything in life. What I like is correct by definition and everyone else is wrong

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Circle back to something I already gave you a clear explanation for?

Learning facts works in some contexts. The context of hot button political issues, it does not

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Nothing wrong except it doesn’t work.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, (edited ) to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Kids generally don’t have ingrained opinions or social groups formed around whether or not 2+2=4 and generally they’re really just concerned with passing tests

Now this isn’t always true and in cases where it is you WILL have trouble teaching. But the vast majority of school curriculum is not this way.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, (edited ) to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Social beings as well. I wouldn’t even say it’s about how you present facts. We are pretty bad at interrogating our own reasoning for things. We will quote facts when asked for our reasoning, but once you start really digging in it’s often not really about that.

I actually just finished reading “How minds change” by David McRaney and would recommend it to anyone.

But if I had to summarize my biggest takeaway: you can’t really change someone’s mind, you can just facilitate convo with them that leads to them changing their own mind to some degree.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

The context there is obviously very different

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, (edited ) to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Yea it is easier for them to ignore. Choosing to ignore it is still a choice. And the effect of that choice is the continued suspension of human rights. There is no true option of sitting out.

The point is framing it as a “political issue” takes the responsibility off of them. Again, it’s true they see it that way, but all I hear is they only care about themselves.

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

So do you currently think abortion should only be allowed in instances that are about the mother’s health?

wantd2B1ofthestrokes, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

As far as I can tell you see abortion as an “exception” that allows killing of a specific type of human.

While I am not really concerned with humanness. But of the underlying phenomenon that make protecting humans something we should want to do.

If you think about why we want to protect humans and tie to to consciousness and ability to suffer. There’s no exception and we can use our knowledge of human fetus development to inform abortion policy to prevent abortions that would infringe on those conditions.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #