Obviously, the ability for a company to make unilateral decisions that severely affect users is a Big Plus for a movement that is advocating for transparency, open access and user control. Perhaps an enterprising lad, laddess or ladx could build the next Reddit, only decentralized.
And as we all know, you need crypto to do decentralization; it's the only way.
Actually you could scrape decentralisation. No one besides the owner can actually be trusted with knowing what's right for the platform, and u/spez even allowing users to revolt proved that, obviously. Just make the next reddit, but with crypto.
I'm still not sure how that fits here though. The religion thing is secondary to the chicken sandwiches. No one dislikes CZ purely because of his beliefs, but directly because of his business. It would only work as a comparison if the chicken sandwiches were the pseudo-currency of a criminal enterprise and a way to get money out of people with the promise of a chicken sandwich that you wouldn't see, but were assured that with each passing moment, your chicken sandwich investment would yield an ever-increasing supply of chicken sandwiches in perpetuity.
Most people would support a Chic Fil A boycott if the owner was known to be a health code opponent or purposefully created unsafe food or something like that.
In the same way you don't want the bank CEO to be running a Ponzi scheme.
Buttcoin
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.