This would unquestionably be a good thing for both parties. Only problem is that Europe is past the PONR for ever being a military superpower again, in my opinion. They simply don’t have the young population to staff such a force and the population they do have would be so opposed to anything but the US-subsidized defense partnership they enjoy already, that I don’t think it would happen
A federated, multimedia-focused social network with features like custom feeds, user curation abilities, client-side filtering controls, anonymous posting options, user reputation systems, voting, collections, advanced search, user affinities, third-party feed algorithms, machine learning for recommendations, collaborative moderation via user trust levels, achievements, notifications, localization, theming options, threaded comments, chat, customizable profiles, granular blocking controls, quoting, surveys, related posts, downloading posts collections or tags, and more - empowering both users and communities with flexibility and customization in shaping their own experiences.
The disunited states has gone post-truth. When two sides vying for power don’t agree on the nature of reality, ie immigration vs invasion, I don’t see how there can be any agreement or good faith negotiation. So how can the result be anything but war? Whoever invented the notion of alternative facts has a lot to answer for.
Like even if this thing with states acting up doesn’t work out the people they are speaking too are definitely gonna still be riled up.
It seems obvious to me that they are probably planning something for the upcoming election since they would try and make sure that another “election steal” wouldn’t happen again.
The only way that I see this not turning into a civil war is for government to somehow change the conversation drastically so that people aren’t asking these questions.
Because if people begin asking these questions then people planning to do stuff are gonna be even more anxious and try and do the thing earlier.
I’m not sure how they would change the conversation though because all the republican population is going to just ignore them and still think we are heading towards a civil war making it just more likely to happen.
Ingenuity: The helicopter drone that flew on Mars for the last 2.5 years when it was expected to fly just a few times. It is the embodiment of human achievement. Of our minds in this great unknown. I get so wrapped up in politics and war and social issues, then if I think of Ingenuity it scales all these issues down and makes me feel like a fool for that last period of time I’ve been lost. Science and engineering to further the incredible human story of understanding is everything and that is how I am able to reset where we are in this and where we can go.
I think Europe would then be forced to intensify its relations with China. Since China has so far been somewhat cautiously supportive of Russia’s military expansion policy, or at least has not decisively sanctioned it, I think that would be a reasonable way of minimizing the risk of military aggression from Russia in the first place. I hardly believe that Russia would risk a military conflict with Europe if they could not expect support or even just tolerance of such actions from China. The consequence for the USA would then not only be a loss of strategic military influence in Europe, but probably also considerable losses in terms of trade and so on.
asklemmy
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.